The promise and the promises: Partnerships from a university perspective

Teacher Educator

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 165-184

  Higgins, Karen M ^a   Merickel, Mark L ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344495562     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878739709555143     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bradley, B., May 13 1971. Rationale and definition of the portal school concept, May 13, Washington, DC:Council of the Great City Schools. Unpublished memorandum to Portal School Project Steering Committee.
2. Cochran‐Smith, M., and Lytle, S., 1993. Inside/outside:Teacher research and knowledge, New York:Teachers College Press.
3. David, J. L., 1991. What it takes to restructure education. Educational Leadership, 48(8):11–15.
4. Dixon, P., and Ishler, R., 1992. Professional development schools:Stages in collaboration. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1):28–34.
5. Duffy, G., 1994. Professional development schools and the disempowerment of teachers and professors. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(8):596–600.
6. Goodlad, J., 1993. School‐university partnerships and partner schools. Educational Policy, 7(1):24–39.
7. Grossman, P., 1994. “ In pursuit of a dual agenda:Creating a middle level professional development school ”. In Professional development schools:Schools for developing a profession, Edited by:Darling‐Hammond, L. 50–73. New York:Teachers College Press.
8. Hollingsworth, S., and Sockett, H., 1994. “ Positioning teacher research in educational reform:An introduction ”. In Teacher research and educational reform, Edited by:Hollingsworth, S., and Sockett, H., 1–20. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
9. Holmes Group. 1990. Tomorrow's schools:Principles for the design of professional development schools, East Lansing, MI:Author.
10. Holmes Group. January 1995. Tomorrow's schools of education:A report of the Holmes Grou, January, Press Embargo. (final draft).
11. Lieberman, A., and Miller, L., 1990. Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record, 92(1):105–122.
12. Oregon Educational Act for the 21st Century, H.B. 3565 (1991).
13. Powell, J., and McGowan, T., 1995. Adjusting the focus:Teachers’ roles and responsibilities in a school/university collaborative. The Teacher Educator, 31(1):1–22.
14. Rushcamp, S., and Roehler, L., 1992. Characteristics supporting change in a professional development school. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1):19–27.
15. Soltis, J., 1994. “ The new teacher ”. In Teacher research and educational reform, Edited by:Hollingsworth, S., and Sockett, H., 245–260. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
16. Stallings, J., and Kowalski, T., 1990. “ Research on professional development schools ”. In Handbook of research on teacher education, Edited by:Houston, W. R., Haverman, M., and Sikula, J., 251–263. New York:Macmillan.
17. Stoddart, T., 1993. The professional development school:Building bridges between cultures. Educational Policy, 7(1):5–23.
18. Threatt, S., Buchanan, J., Morgan, B., Yermanock Strieb, L., Sugarman, J., Swenson, K., and Tomlinson, J., 1994. “ Teachers’ voices in the conversation about teacher research ”. In Teacher research and educational reform, Edited by:Hollingsworth, S., and Sockett, H., 222–244. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
19. Watson, N., and Fullan, M., 1992. “ Beyond school district‐university partnerships ”. In Teacher development and educational change, Edited by:Fullan, M., and Hargreaves, A., 213–242. Washington, DC:Falmer.
20. Winitzky, N., Stoddart, T., and O'Keefe, P., 1992. Great expectations:Emergent professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1):3–18.