New Zealand ophthalmologists' research productivity

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 459-460

  Pon, Jo Anne M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; METHODOLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; OPHTHALMOLOGY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

AUSTRALIA; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; OPHTHALMOLOGY;

EID: 0344468052     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00703.x     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. McMenamin PG. Research productivity in Australian ophthalmology. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 281-3.
2. Davis M, Wilson CS. Research contributions in ophthalmology: Australia's productivity. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 286-93.
3. Institute for Scientific Information. Science citation index. In: Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information, 2002. Available from http://isiknowledge.com
4. Askew DA, Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB. Research output of Australian general practice: A comparison with medicine, surgery and public health. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 77-80.
5. McGhee CN. The future of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 1-3.
6. Sims JL, McGhee CN. Citation analysis and journal impact factors in ophthalmology and vision science journals. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 14-22.
7. Wierzbicki AS, Reynolds TM. Total research productivity in a pathology discipline. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 495-8.