Costs of immune defense: An enigma wrapped in an environmental cloak?

Trends in Parasitology

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 571-574

  Sandland, Gregory J ^a   Minchella, Dennis J ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; COST; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; HOST RESISTANCE; HUMAN; IMMUNE FUNCTION TEST; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNITY; IMMUNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; PARASITE; PARASITOSIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SNAIL; SURVIVAL; TREMATODE; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GASTROPODA; MELANOGASTER; TREMATODA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0344430166     PISSN: 14714922     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2003.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Roff D.A. The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis. 1992;Chapman & Hall.
2. Stearns S.C. The Evolution of Life Histories. 1993;Oxford University Press.
3. Minchella D., Scott M. Parasitism: a cryptic determinant of animal community structure. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:1991;250-254.
4. Agrawal A., et al. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution. 53:1999;1093-1104.
5. Boots M., Begon M. Trade-offs with resistance to a granulosis virus in the Indian meal moth, examined by laboratory evolution experiments. Funct. Ecol. 7:1993;528-534.
6. Langand J., et al. Cost of resistance, expressed as a delayed maturity, detected in the host-parasite system Biomphalaria glabrata/Echinostoma caproni. Heredity. 80:1998;320-325.
7. Koricheva J. Meta analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses. Ecology. 83:2002;176-190.
8. Strauss S., et al. Direct and ecological costs of herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;278-285.
9. Lochmiller R., Deerenberg C. Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos. 88:2000;87-98.
10. Sheldon B., Verhulst S. Ecological immunity: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;317-321.
11. Webster J., Woolhouse M. Costs of resistance: relationship between fertility and increased resistance in a snail-schistosome host-parasite system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 266:1999;391-396.
12. Rigby M., et al. Why should resistance be costly? Trends Parasitol. 18:2002;116-120.
13. Williams T., et al. Enhanced immune function does not depress reproductive output. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 266:1999;553-757.
14. Svensson E., et al. Energetic stress, immunosuppression and the costs of an antibody response. Funct. Ecol. 12:1998;912-919.
15. Sandland G., Minchella D. Effects of diet and Echinostoma revolutum infection on energy allocation patterns in juvenile Lymnaea elodes snails. Oecologia. 134:2003;479-486.
16. Kraaijeveld A., Godfray H. Trade-offs between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 389:1997;278-280.
17. Harshman L., Hoffmann A. Laboatory experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;32-36.
18. Moret Y., Schmidt-Hempel P. Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science. 290:2000;1166-1198.
19. Hoang A. Immune response to parasitism reduces resistance of Drosophila melanogaster to desiccation and starvation. Evolution. 55:2001;2353-2358.
20. Lochmiller R., et al. Relationship between protein nutritional status and immunocompetence in Northern Bobwhite chicks. Auk. 110:1993;503-510.
21. Rigby M., Jokela J. Predator avoidance and immune defence: costs and trade-offs in snails. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 267:2000;171-176.
22. Tien N., et al. Competitive ability of parasitized Drosophila larvae. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:2001;747-757.
23. Fellowes A., et al. The relative fitness of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera, Drosophilidae) that have successfully defended themselves against the parasitoid Asobara tabida (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). J. Evol. Biol. 12:1999;123-128.
24. Cousteau C., et al. Resistance to xenobiotics and parasites: can we count the cost? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;378-383.
25. Kraaijeveld A., et al. Basis for the trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. S268:2000;259-261.
26. Van der Knapp W., et al. Invertebrate blood cells: morphological and functional aspects of the haemocytes of the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis. Comp. Haematol. Int. 3:1993;20-26.
27. Siva-Jothy M., et al. Investment in immune function under chronic and acute immune challenge in an insect. Physiol. Entomol. 26:2001;1-5.
28. Iwanaga S. The molecular basis of innate immunity in the horseshoe crab. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14:2002;87-95.
29. Loker E., Adema C. Schistosomes, echinostomes and snails: comparative immunobiology. Parasitol. Today. 11:1995;120-124.
30. Tzou P., et al. How Drosophila combats microbial infection: a model to study innate immunity and host-pathogen interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5:2002;102-110.
31. Lochmiller R., et al. Temporal variation in humoral and cell-mediated immune response in a Sigmodon hispidus population. Ecology. 1:1993;236-245.
32. Yourth C., et al. Immune expression in a damselfly is related to time of season, not to fluctuating asymmetry or host size. Ecol. Entomol. 27:2002;123-128.
33. Ferguson H., Read A. Genetic and environmental determinants of malaria parasite virulence in mosquitoes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 1497:2002;1217-1224.
34. Brown M., et al. Condition-dependent expression of virulence in a trypanosome infecting bumblebees. Oikos. 91:2000;421-427.
35. Feder D., et al. Immune responses in Rhodnius prolixus: Influence of nutrition and ecdysone. J. Insect Physiol. 43:1997;513-519.
36. Hosken D. Sex and Death: microevolutionary trade-offs between reproductive and immune investment. Curr. Biol. 11:2002;R379-R380.
37. Zuk M., Johnsen T. Social environment and immunity in male red jungle fowl. Behav. Ecol. 11:2000;146-153.
38. Reznick D., et al. Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;421-425.