Dominancia social en machos de faisán común: Posible origen metodológico de las discrepancias entre estudios

Etologia

Volumn , Issue 5, 1997, Pages 39-58

  Mateos, Concha ^a   Del Carmen Illanes, María ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Methodological problems; Ring necked pheasants; Social dominance

Indexed keywords

GOES; PHASIANIDAE; PHASIANUS COLCHICUS;

EID: 0344426920     PISSN: 11303204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersson, M. 1982. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 17, 375-393.
2. Appleby, M. C. 1983. The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Anim. Behav., 31, 600-608.
3. Arcese, P. & Ludwig, D. 1986. Improving estimates of dominance based on ratios. The Condor, 88, 106-107.
4. Benton, D., Dalrymple-Alford, J.C. & Brain, P.F. 1980. Comparisons of measures of dominance in the laboratory mouse. Anim. Behav., 28, 1274-1279.
5. Benton, D. 1982. Is the concept of dominance useful in understanding rodent behaviour?. Aggressive Behaviour., 8, 104-107.
6. Biadi, F. & Mayot, P. 1990. Les Faisans. Paris: Hatier.
7. Boyd, R. & Silk, J.B. 1983. A method for assigning cardinal dominance ranks. Anim. Behav., 31, 45-58.
8. Brodsky, L.M. 1988. Ornament size influences mating success in male rock ptarmigan. Anim. Behav., 36, 662-667.
9. Brown, J. 1975. The evolution of behaviour. W.W. Norton: New York.
10. Chase, I.D. 1982. Dynamics of hierarchy formation: the sequential development of dominance relationships. Behaviour, 80, 218-240.
11. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D., Gibson, R.M. & Guinness, F.E. 1979. The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim. Behav., 27, 211-225.
12. Collias, N.E. 1943. Statistical analisys of factors which make for success in initial encounters between hens. American Naturalist, 77, 519-538.
13. Collias, N.E. & Taber, R.D. 1951. A field study of some grouping and dominance relations in ring-necked pheasants. Condor, 53, 265-275.
14. Cramp, S. & Simmons, K.E.L. (eds.) 1980. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Drews, C. 1993. The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour, 125, 283-313.
16. Fournier, F. & Festa-Bianchet, M. 1995. Social dominance in adult female mountain goats. Anim. Behav., 49, 1449-1459
17. Göransson, G., von Schantz, T., Fröberg, I., Helgée, A. & Wittzell, H. 1990. Male characteristics, viability and harem size in the pheasant, Phasianus colchicus. Anim. Behav., 40, 89-104.
18. Grahn, M., Göransson, G. & von Schantz, T. 1993a. Spacing behaviour of male pheasants Phasianus colchicus: in relation to dominance and mate acquisition. Anim. Behav., 45, 93-103.
19. Grahn, M., Göransson, G. & von Schantz, T. 1993b. Territory adquisition and mating success in pheasants, Phasianus colchicus: an experiment. Anim. Behav., 46, 721-730.
20. Hass, C.C. 1991. Social status in female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): expression, development and reproductive correlates. J. Zool., Lond., 225, 509-523.
21. Hiatt, R.W. & Fisher, H.I. 1947. The reproductive cycle of ring-necked pheasants in Montana. Auk, 64, 528-548.
22. Hill, D.A. & Robertson, P. 1988. The pheasant. Ecology, management and conservation. Oxford: BSP Professional Books.
23. Hillgarth, N. 1990a. Parasites and female choice in the ring-necked pheasant, Phasianus colchicus. Amer. Zool., 30, 227-233.
24. Holder, K. & Montgomerie, R. 1993. Context and consequences of comb displays by male rock ptarmigan. Anim. Behav., 45, 457-470.
25. Jackson, W.M. 1988. Can Individual Differences in History of Dominance Explain the Development of Linear Dominance Hierarchies?. Ethology, 79, 71-77.
26. Kalinoski, R. 1975. Intra and interspecific aggression in the house finches and house sparrows. The Condor, 77, 375-384.
27. Kaufmann, J.H. 1983. On the definitions and functions of dominance and territoriality. Biol. Rev., 58, 1-20.
28. Kikkawa, J. 1980. Weight changes in relation to social hierarchy in captive flocks of silvereyes, Zosterops lateralis. Behaviour, 74, 92-100.
29. Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J.H. 1984. Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favoured by sexual selection. Am. Nat., 124, 309-323.
30. Kratzer, D.D. & Craig, J.V. 1980. Mating behavior of cockerels: effects of sicial status, group size and group density. Applied Animal Ethology, 6, 49-62.
31. Lachlan, C. & Bray, R.P. 1976. Habitat selection by cock pheasants in spring. J. Appl. Ecol., 13, 691-704.
32. Leonard, M.L. & Horn, A.G. 1995. Crowing in relation to status in roosters. Anim. Behav., 49, 1283-1290.
33. Ligon, J.D., Thornhill, R., Zuk, M. & Johnson, K. 1990. Male-male competition, ornamentation and the role of testosterone in sexual selection in red jungle fowl Anim. Behav., 40, 367-373.
34. Mateos, C. 1993. Selección sexual en el faisán común (Phasianus colchicus). Thesis, University of Extremadura.
35. Mateos, C. & Carranza, J. (en prensa,a) Lack of female preference on experimentally-manipulated pheasant spurs. Behav. Ecol.
36. Mateos, C. & Carranza, J. (en prensa,b). Signals in intrasexual competition between ring-necked pheasant males. Anim. Behav.
37. McIntyre, D.C. & Chew, G.L. 1983. Relation Between Social Rank, Submissive Behavior, and Brain Catecholamine Levels in Ring-Necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Behavioral Neuroscience, 97, 595-601.
38. Ridley, M.W. & Hill, D.A. 1987. Social organization in the pheasant (Phasianus colchicus): harem formation, mate selection and the role of mate guarding. J. Zool., Lond., 211, 619-630.
39. Rohwell, T.E. 1974. The concept of social dominance. Behav. Biol., 11, 31-154.
40. Rohwer, S. & Ewald, P.W. 1981. The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution, 35, 441-454.
41. Rushen, J. 1984a. Frecuencies of agonistic behaviours as measures of aggression in chickens: A factor analysis. Appl. Anim. Behav. Scien., 12, 167-176.
42. Rushen, J. 1984b. How peck orders of chickens are measured: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 11, 255-264.
43. Senar, J.C., Camerino, M. & Metcalfe, N.B. 1994. The use of correspondence analysis to generate cardinal dominance ranks. Etología, 4, 69-75.
44. Syme, G.J. & Syme, L.A. 1983. Social dominance -a straw man revisited: Some comments on the paper by Beilharz and Zeeb. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 9, 380-387.
45. Tamm, S. 1977. Social domiance in captive jackdaws (Corvus monedula). Behavioural Pricesses, 2, 293-299.
46. Tomback, D.F., Wachter, M.A., Driscoll, J.W. & Becoff, M. 1989. Measuring Dominance and Constructing Hierarchies: An Esample Using Mule Deer. Ethology, 82, 275-286.
47. Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology, the new synthesis. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
48. Zahavi, A. 1991. On the definition of sexual selection, Ficher's model, and the evolution of waste and of signals in general. Anim. Behav., 42, 501-503.
49. Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.