|
|
|
Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 174-192
|
|
Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL DISEASE;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
POLICY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
STANDARD;
T.D. V. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL;
T.D. V. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GUIDELINES;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MARYLAND;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTAL DISORDERS;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 0344374498
PISSN: 10974768
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (0)
|
