Paradigms for abstracting systems

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 365-380

  Pinto, María ^a   Gálvez, Carmen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES;

COGNITIVE PARADIGMS; COMMUNICATIONAL PARADIGMS; PHYSICAL PARADIGMS; SYSTEMATIC PARADIGMS;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 0344339093     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016555159902500503     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1970).
2. C.E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1949).
3. F.W. Lancaster, Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice (University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1998).
4. T. Edwards, A Comparative Analysis of the Major Abstracting and Indexing Services for Library and Information Science (Unesco, Paris, 1975).
5. A. Gilchrist, Documentation of documentation: a survey of leading abstracts services in documentation and an identification of key journals, Aslib Proceedings 18 (1966) 62-80.
6. F.W. Lancaster, Some considerations relating to the cost effectiveness of online services in libraries, Aslib Proceedings 33 (1981) 10-14.
7. A. Wheatley and C.J. Armstrong, Metadata, recall, and abstracts: can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? Aslib Proceedings 49(8) (1997) 206-213.
8. G. Salton and M.J. McGill, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983).
9. D. Ellis, The physical and cognitive paradigms in information retrieval research, Journal of Documentation 48(1) (1992) 45-64.
10. G. Salton, Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989).
11. C.D. Paice, Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects, Information Processing and Management 26(1) (1990) 171-186.
12. H.P. Luhn, The automatic creation of literature abstracts, IBM Journal of Research and Development 2 (1958) 156-165.
13. V.A. Oswald et al., Automatic Indexing and Abstracting of Contents of Documents (Planning Research Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, 1959).
14. H.P. Edmundson, New methods in automatic extracting, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 16 (1969) 264-289.
15. P.B. Baxendale, Machine-made index for technical literature: an experiment, IBM Journal of Research and Development 2 (1958) 354-361.
16. J.E. Rush, R. Salvador and A. Zamora, Automatic abstracting and indexing. II. Production of indicative abstracts by application of contextual inference and syntactic coherence criteria, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 22(4) (1971) 260-274.
17. C.D. Paice, The automatic generation of literature abstracts: an approach based on the identification of self-indicating phrases. In: R.N. Oddy, S.E. Roberson, C.J. Van Rijsbergen and P.W. Williams (eds), Information Retrieval Research (Butterworths, London, 1981), pp. 172-191.
18. W.J. Black and F.C. Johnson, A practical evaluation of two rule-based automatic abstracting techniques, Expert Systems for Information Management 1(3) (1988) 159-177.
19. E.D. Liddy et al., A study of discourse anaphora in scientific abstracts, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 34(4) (1987) 255-261.
20. G.D. Husk, Techniques for Automatic Abstraction of Technical Documents Using Reference Resolution and Self-Indication Phrases (Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, 1988).
21. K. McKeown, Discourse strategies for generating natural language text, Artificial Intelligence (1985) 1-41.
22. B.J.F. Meyer, Prose analysis: purpose, procedures and problems. In: B.K. Britton and J.B. Black (eds), Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analysing Explanatory Texts (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1985), pp. 11-64.
23. T.A. van Dijk, Macro-Structures (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1980).
24. E.D. Liddy, Discourse-level structure in abstracts. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of ASIS (Learned Information, Medford, NJ, 1987), pp. 138-147.
25. G. Salton et al., Automatic text structuring and summarization, Information Processing and Management 33(2) (1997) 193-207.
26. K. Markey et al., An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free-text search statements in online searches, Online Review 4 (1980) 225-236.
27. C. Tenopir, Full text database retrieval performance, Online Review 9 (1985) 149-164.
28. J.S. Ro, An evaluation of the applicability of ranking algorithms to improve the effectiveness of full-text retrieval, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39 (1988) 73-78.
29. D.C. Blair and M.E. Maron, An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system, Communications of the ACM 28 (1985) 289-299.
30. N. Wiener, Cybernetics (John Wiley, New York, 1948).
31. N. Chomsky, Syntactic Structures (Mouton, The Hague, 1957).
32. M.A. Minsky, Framework for representing knowledge. In: P.H. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision (Academic Press, New York, 1975).
33. J.R. Anderson, Acquisition of cognitive skills, Psychological Review 89(3) (1982) 369-406.
34. Z.W. Pylyshyn, Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984).
35. J.D. Fodor, On modularity in syntactic processing, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 17(2) (1988) 125-168.
36. D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986).
37. T. Winograd, A framework for understanding discourse. In: M.A. Just and P.A. Carpenter (eds), Cognitive Processes in Comprehension (Wiley, New York, 1977).
38. T.A. van Dijk and W. Kintsch, Strategies of Discourse Comprehension (Academic Press, New York, 1983).
39. K.I. Forster, Levels of processing and the structure of language processors. In: W.E. Cooper and E.C. Walker (eds), Sentence Processing (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1979).
40. W.D. Marslen-Wilson, Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition, Cognition 25 (1987) 71-102.
41. J.P. Stemberger, An interactive activation model of language production. In: A.W. Ellis (ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol. 1 (Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 1985).
42. D. Laberge and S.J. Samuels, Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, Cognitive Psychology 6 (1974) 293-323.
43. K. Goodman, Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In: P. Primsleurs and T. Quinn (eds), The Psychology of Second Language Learning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971).
44. D.E. Rumelhart, Human Information Processing (Wiley, New York, 1977).
45. J.R. Anderson, The Architecture of Cognition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983).
46. J. Brown, Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10 (1958) 12-21.
47. L.R. Peterson, Short-term retention of individual items, Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1959) 12-21.
48. R.C. Atkinson and R.M. Shiffrin, Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: K.W. Spence and J.T. Spence (eds), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1968).
49. L. Flower and J.R. Hayes, A cognitive process theory of writing, College Composition and Communication 32 (1988) 365-387.
50. M. Pinto, Interdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written text documentary content analysis (WTDCA), Journal of Documentation 50(2) (1994) 113-133.
51. B. Endres-Niggemeyer, Professional summarising: no cognitive simulation without observation. In: Fourth International Colloquium on Cognitive Science (1995).
52. M. Pinto and C. Gálvez, Análisis Documental de Contenido [Documentary content analysis] (Síntesis, Madrid, 1996).
53. D.E. Rumelhart and A. Ortony, The representation of knowledge in memory. In: A. Anderson, R.J. Spiro and N.E. Montague (eds), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977), pp. 99-135.
54. R.C. Schank and R.P. Abelson, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977).
55. M.R. Quillian, The teachable language comprehender: a simulation program and theory of language, Communications of the ACM 12(8) (1969) 459-476.
56. G. Dejong, An overview of the FRUMP systems. In: W.G. Rehnert and M.H. Ringle (eds), Strategies for Natural Language Processing (Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 1982), pp. 149-172.
57. L.F. Rau, Knowledge organization and access in a conceptual information system, Information Processing and Management 23(4) (1987) 269-283.
58. U. Hahn and U. Reimer, The TOPIC Project: Text-Oriented Procedures for Information Management and Condensation of Expository Tests (University of Constance, Constance, Germany, 1985).
59. D. Fum et al., Forward and backward reasoning in automatic abstracting. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 83-88.
60. U. Hahn and U. Reimer, Heuristic text parsing in TOPIC: methodological issues in a knowledge-based text condensation system. In: H.J. Dietschmann (ed.), Representation and Exchange of Knowledge as a Basis of Information Processes (North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 143-163.
61. R. Grishman, J. Sterling and C. Macleod, Description of the PROTEUS systems as used for MUC-3. In: Proceedings of the Message Understanding Conference-3 (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991), pp. 183-190.
62. A. Moreno Sandoval et al., PROTEUS: un sistema multilingue de extracción de información [PROTEUS: a multilingual system for information extraction]. In: VIII Congreso de la Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural (SEPLN) (SEPLN, Granada, 1993), pp. 47-56.
63. M. De Mey, The relevance of the cognitive paradigm for information science. In: O. Harbo and L. Kajberg (eds), Theory and Application of Information Research. Proceedings of the 2nd International Research Forum in Information Science (Mansell, London, 1980), pp. 49-61.
64. N.J. Belkin, The cognitive viewpoint in information science, Journal of Information Science 16 (1990) 11-15.
65. P.J. Daniels, Cognitive models in information retrieval: an evaluation review, Journal of Documentation 42(4) (1986) 272-304.
66. P. Ingwersen, Search procedures in the library analysed from the cognitive point of view, Journal of Documentation 38 (1982) 165-191.
67. P. Ingwersen, Information Retrieval Interaction (Taylor Graham, London, 1992).
68. R. Fidel, Writing abstracts for free-text searching, Journal of Documentation 42(1) (1986) 11-21.
69. E.D. Liddy, The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study, Information Processing and Management 27(1) (1991) 55-81.
70. J. Hartley, M. Sydes and A. Blurton, Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient? Journal of Information Science 22(5) (1996) 349-356.
71. L. von Bertalanffy, General Systems Theory (G. Braziller, New York, 1968).
72. J. Willitts, Database Design and Construction: An Open Learning Course for Students and Information Managers (Library Association Publishing, London, 1992).
73. E. Yourdon, Modern Structured Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988).
74. P.B. Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1981).
75. M. Bunge, Social systems. In: R. Rodríguez Delgado and B.H. Banathy (eds), International Systems Science Handbook: An Introduction to Systems Science for Everbody (Systemic Publications, Madrid, 1993), pp. 211-221.
76. D. Soergel, Organizing Information: Principles of Data and Retrieval Systems (Academic Press, London, 1985).
77. C.T. Meadow, Text Information Retrieval Systems (Academic Press, London, 1992).