Participatory design of information systems in health care

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 177-183

  Sjöberg, Cecilia ^a   Timpka, Toomas ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 0344333473     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050177     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985; 103:596-9.
2. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Blyth AJC, Southon G, Dixon BJ. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:79-93.
3. Forsythe DE. Blaming the users in medical informatics: the cultural nature of scientific practice. Knowledge and Society. 1992;9:95-111.
4. Goldkuhl G, Röstlinger A. The legitimacy of information systems development: a need for change analysis. In: Proceedings of the First IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. London: IFIP, 1984.
5. Boehm BW. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computers. 1988;21:61-72.
6. Special Issue on Participatory Design. Communications of the ACM. 1993;36.
7. Luff P, Heath C, Greatbatch D. Work, interaction and technology: the naturalistic analysis of human conduct and requirement analysis. In: Jirotka M, Goguen J (eds.). Requirement Engineering: Social and Technical Issues. London, England: Academic Press, 1994:259-88.
8. Brun-Cottan F, Wall P. Using video to re-present the user. Communications of the ACM. 1995;38:61-71.
9. Kyng M. Creating contexts for design. In: Carroll JM (ed.). Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in Systems Development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995:85-107.
10. Rifkin S. Lessons from community participation in health care. Health Policy and Planning. 1986;1:240-9.
11. Anderson WL, Crocca WT. Experiences in reflective engineering practice: co-development of product prototypes. In: Muller MJ, Kuhn S, Meskill JA (eds.). Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference. Palo Alto, CA: CPSR, 1992.
12. Greenbaum J. A design of one's own: towards participatory design in the United States. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds.). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993:27-37.
13. Bucciarelli LL. An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies. 1988;9:159-68.
14. Lawson B. How designers think: the design process demystified. Oxford, England: Butterworth Architecture, 1990.
15. Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Entering the field of qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994:1-17.
16. Timpka T, Marmolin H. Beyond computer-based clinical reminders: improvement of the total service quality by small-group based organizational learning in primary care. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ (eds.). Proceedings of Eight World Congress on Medical Informatics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier-North Holland, 1995.
17. Sjöberg C, Timpka T, Nyce J, Peolsson M, af Klercker T. From clinical literature to medical hypermedia: procedures and experiences. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Rienhoff O (eds.). Proc Medinfo 92. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier-North Holland, 1992.
18. Timpka T, Sjöberg C, Svensson B. The pragmatics of clinical hypermedia: experiences from five years of participatory design in the MEDEA project. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1995;46:175-86.
19. Timpka T, Nyce JM, Sjöberg C, Johansson M. Action design: from modeling to support of the software process. In: Blum B (ed.). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. San Francisco, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993.
20. Gustavsen B. Workplace reform and democratic dialogue. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 1985;6:461-79.
21. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.
22. Wertsch JV. Voices of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
23. Engeström R. Voices as Communicative Action. Mind, Culture and Activity. 1995;2:192-215.
24. Sjöberg C. Voices in Design: Argumentation in Participatory Development. Licentiate Thesis (Thesis no. 436), Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1994.
25. Curtis B, Krasner H, Iscoe N. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM. 1988;31:1268-85.
26. Engeström Y. Mundane tool or object of affection: the rise and fall of the postal buddy. In: Nardi BA (ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
27. Korpela M. Nigerian Practice in Computer Systems Development: A Multidisciplinary Theoretical Framework, Applied to Health Informatics. Dissertation. Faculty of Information Technology, Department of Computer Science, Helsinki University of Technology, 1994.
28. Weiner JA. A comparison of primary care in the USA, Denmark, Finland and Sweden: lessons for Scandinavia? Scand J Prim Health Care. 1988;6:13-27.
29. Mumford E. The participation of users in systems design: an account of the origin, evolution and use of the ETHICS method. In: Schuler, Namioka A (eds.). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993:257-70.
30. Bödker S, Grönbaek K, Kyng M. Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds.). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993: 157-75.
31. Thoresen K. Principles in practice: two cases of situated participatory design. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds.). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993:271-87.
32. Keen J, Packwood T. Case study evaluation. In: Mays N, Pope C (eds.). Qualitative research in health care. London, England: BMJ Publishing Group, 1996:59-67.
33. Lundsgaarde HP, Fisher PJ, Steele DJ. Human problems in computerized medicine. University of Kansas Publications of Anthropology, no. 13. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas, 1981.
34. Nyce JM, Timpka T. Work, knowledge and argument in specialist consultations: incorporating tacit knowledge into systems design and development. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1993; 31:HTA16-9.
35. Forsythe DE. New bottles, old wine: hidden cultural assumptions in a computerized explanation system for migraine sufferers. Med Anthropol Q. 1996;10. in press.
36. Rittel H. Second-generation design methods. In: Cross N (ed.). Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
37. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners. 1969;35:216-22.
38. Emery M. Towards a heuristic theory of diffusion. Human Relations. 1986;39:411-32.