In Vitro Studies on the Interaction of Phytase with Trypsin and Amylase Extracted from Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Hepatopancreas

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 4973-4976

  Divakaran, S ^a   Ostrowski, Anthony C ^a  

^a OCEANIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Amylase; Interaction; Phytase; Shrimp; Trypsin

Indexed keywords

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); GLYCINE MAX; LITOPENAEUS VANNAMEI; PENAEUS;

EID: 0344330885     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf980662w     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AOAC. AOAC Method 965.17. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed.; AOAC Inc., Arlington, VA, 1990; p 88.
2. Beers, S.; Jongbloed, A. W. Effect of supplementary Aspergillus niger phytase in diets for piglets on their performance and apparent digestibility of phosphorus. Anim. Prod. 1992, 55, 425-430.
3. Cain, K. D.; Garling D. L. Pretreatment of soybean meal with phytase for salmonid diets to reduce phosphorus concentrations in hatchery effluents. Prog. Fish Cult. 1995, 57, 114-119.
4. Campbell, G. L.; Bedford, M. R. Enzyme applications inmonogastric feeds: A Review. Con. J. Animal Sci. 1992, 7 (3), 449-466.
5. Civera-Ceracedo, R.; Guillame, J. Effect of sodium phytate on the Japanese shrimp Penaeus japonicus. International Council for the exploration of the sea. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1987; p 13.
6. Garling, D. L. (Unpublished). Tropical aquaculture feeds and culture technology development annual report, Submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture by The Oceanic Institute, Makapuu Point, Waimanalo, Hawaii, April 1995.
7. Gibson, R.; Baker, P. L. The decapod hepatopancreas. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 1979, 17, 285-346.
8. Knuckles, B. E.; Betschart A. A. Effect of phytate and other myo-inositol phosphate esters on α-amylase digestion of starch. J. Food Sci. 1987, 52, 719-721.
9. Knuckles, B. E.; Kuzmicky D. D.; Betschart A. A. Effect of phytate and partially hydrolyzed phytate on in vitro protein digestibility. J. Food Sci. 1985, 50, 1080-1082.
10. Li, K.; Alli, I.; Kermasha, S. In-Vitro α-amylase inhibitor activity-Phytate relationships in proteins from Phaseolus beans. Food Res. Int. 1993, 26, 195-200.
11. Liu, K.; Markakis, P. An improved colorimetric method for determining antitryptic activity in soybean products. Cereal Chem. 1989, 66 (5), 415-422.
12. Lowry, O. H.; Rosenberg, N. J.; Farr, A. L.; Randal, R. J. Protein determination with folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265-275.
13. Maugle, P. D.; Deshimaru, O.; Katayama, T.; Simpson, K. L. Characteristics of amylase and protease of the shrimp Penaeus japonicus. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1982, 48 (12), 1753-1757.
14. Ravindran, V.; Kornegay, E. T.; Denbow, D. M.; Yi, Z.; Hulet, R. M. Response of turkey poults to tiered levels of Natuphos phytase added soybean meal-based semi-purified diets containing three levels of nonphytate phosphorus. Poult. Sci. 1995, 47, 1372-1374.
15. Rinderknecht, P.; Wilding, P.; Haverback, B. J. A new method for the determination of α-amylase. Experienta 1967, 23, 805.
16. Stevens, L. Buffers and the determination of protein concentration. In Enzyme assays, A practical approach. Eisenthal, R.; Dnason, M. J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: NY, 1992; Chapter 11, pp 317-335.