Physiologic response to a prescribed rating of perceived exertion on an elliptical fitness cross-trainer

Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 300-305

  Batte A L ^a   Darling, J ^a   Evans, J ^a   Lance, L M ^a   Olson, E I ^a   Pincivero, D M ^b  

^a EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

Exercise, physiology; Exertion; Oxygen consumption

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BORG CATEGORY RATIO SCALE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EXERCISE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FITNESS; HEALTH STATUS; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSCLE EXERCISE; MUSCLE TRAINING; NORMAL HUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PERCEPTION; PRESCRIPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION SCALE; RATING SCALE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ADULT; EXERCISE; EXERTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PEPTIDES; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; SPORTS;

EID: 0344306631     PISSN: 00224707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dunbar C, Robertson RJ, Baun R, Blandin MF, Metz KF, Burdett R et al. The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:94-9.
2. Dunbar CC, Goris C, Michielli DW, Kalinski MI. Accuracy and reproducibility of an exercise prescription based on ratings of perceived exertion for treadmill and cycle ergometer exercise. Percept Mot Skills 1994;78:1335-44.
3. Glass SC, Knowlton RG, Becque MD. Accuracy of RPE from graded exercise to establish exercise training intensity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:1303-7.
4. Robertson RJ, Noble BJ. Perception of physical exertion: methods, mediators, and applications. In: J. Holloszy, editor. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1997. p.407-52.
5. th edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1995.
6. Kravitz L, Robergs RA, Heyward VH, Wagner DR, Powers K. Exercise mode and gender comparisons of energy expenditure at self-selected intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:1028-35.
7. Mercer JA, Dufek JS, Bates BT. Analysis of peak oxygen consumption and heart rate during elliptical and treadmill exercise. J Sport Rehabil 2001;10:48-56.
8. Melanson EL, Freedson PS, Hendelman D, Debold E. Reliability and validity of a portable metabolic measurement system. Can J Appl Physiol 1996;21:109-19.
9. Wideman L, Stoudemire NM, Pass KA, McGinnes CL, Gaesser GA, Weltman A. Assessment of the Aerosport TEEM 100 portable metabolic measurement system. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:509-15.
10. Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1996.
11. Powers SK, Howley ET. Exercise physiology: theory and application to fitness and performance. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
12. Kang J, Chaloupka ED, Mastrangelo MA, Donnelly MS, Martz WP, Robertson RJ. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998;78:241-6.
13. Glass SC, Holbomb RR. Heart rate response associated with non-paced exercise prescription using ratings of perceived exertion. J Stren Cond Res 1997;11:246-50.
14. Borg G. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14:377-81.
15. Noble BJ, Borg G, Jacobs I, Ceci R, Kaiser P. A category-ratio perceived exertion scale: relationship to blood and muscle lactate and heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983;15:523-8.