Solvent Strength Parameters and Retention Factors in Pure Water Using UNIFAC-Predicted Activity Coefficients

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 42, Issue 25, 2003, Pages 6320-6330

  Park, Jung Hag ^a   Jung, Yun Jung ^a   Vitha, Mark F ^b   Carr, Peter W ^c  

^a Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

^b DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONITRILE; FREE ENERGY; FUNCTIONS; LINEAR EQUATIONS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SOLVENTS;

BINARY ELUENTS; RETENTION FACTORS;

WATER;

ACETONITRILE; SOLVENT; WATER;

LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LIQUID-LIQUID SEPARATION; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DILUTION; ENERGY TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SOLUTE;

EID: 0344305555     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie0209125     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Prausnitz, J. M. Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
2. Fredenslund, A.; Gmehling, J.; Rasmussen, P. Vapor-Liquid Equilibria Using UNIFAC; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1977.
3. Fredenslund, A.; Gmehling, J.; Rasmussen, P. Vapor-Liquid Equilibria Using UNIFAC; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1977.
4. Roth, M.; Novak, J. Utilization of the Solution-of-groups Concept in Gas-liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1983, 258, 23.
5. Gmehling, J.; Weidlich, U. Results of a Modified UNIFAC Method for Alkane-Alcohol Systems. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1986, 27, 171.
6. Price, G. J.; Dent, M. R. Prediction of Retention in Gas-Liquid Chromatography Using the UNIFAC Group Contribution Method: I. Low-molecular-weight Stationary Phases. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 483, 1.
7. Price, G. J.; Dent, M. R. Prediction of Retention in Gas-Liquid Chromatography Using the UNIFAC group contribution method: II. Polymer Stationary Phases. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 585, 83.
8. Price, G. J. Prediction of Retention in Gas-Liquid Chromatography Using the UNIFAC Group Contribution Method: III. Recent Developments in UNIFAC. J. Chromatogr. 1992, 586, 297.
9. Petrovic, S. M.; Lomic, S.; Sefer, I. Utilization of the Functional Group Contribution Concept in Liquid Chromatography on Chemically Bonded Reversed Phases. J. Chromatogr. 1985, 348, 49.
10. Petrovic, S. M.; Lomic, S. Selectivity in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1989, 12, 59.
11. Dasko, L. Application of the UNIFAC Method for Assessment of Retention in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatograhy. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 543, 267.
12. Park, J. H.; Lee, J. E.; Jang, M. D.; Li, J.; Carr, P. W. UNIFAC Model as a Heuristic Guide for Estimating Retention in Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 586, 1.
13. Park, J. H.; Jang, M. D.; Chae, J. J.; Kim, H. C.; Suh, J. K. UNIFAC Model as a Heuristic Guide for Estimating Retention in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1993, 656, 69.
14. Castells, C. B.; Carr, P. W.; Eikens, D. I.; Bush, D.; Eckert, C. A. Comparative Study of Semitheoretical Models for Predicting Infnite Diltuion Activity Coefficients of Alkanes in Organic Solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 4104.
15. Sherman, S. R.; Trampe, D. B.; Bush, D. M.; Schiller, M.; Eckert, C. A.; Dallas, A. J.; Li, J.; Carr, P. W. Compilation and Correlation of Limiting Activity Coefficients of Nonelectrolytes in Water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 1044.
16. Eckert, C. A.; Sherman, S. R. Measurement and Prediction of Limiting Activity Coefficients. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1996, 116, 333.
17. Thomas, E. R.; Eckert, C. A. Predicition of Limiting Activity Coefficients by a Modified Separation of Cohesive Energy Density Model and UNIFAC. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1984, 23, 194.
18. Hait, M. J.; Liotta, C. L.; Eckert, C. A.; Bergmann, D. L.; Karachewski, A. M.; Dallas, A. J.; Eikens, D. I.; Li, J. J.; Carr, P. W.; Poe, R. B.; Rutan, S. C. Space Predictor for Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 2905.
19. Howell, W. J.; Karachewski, A. M.; Stephenson, K. M.; Eckert, C. A.; Park, J. H.; Carr, P. W.; Rutan, S. C. An Improved MOSCED Equation for the Prediction and Application of Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1989, 52, 151.
20. Li, J.; Dallas, A. J.; Eikens, D. I.; Carr, P. W.; Bergmann, D. L.; Hait, M. J.; Eckert, C. A. Measurement of Large Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients of Nonelectrolytes in Water by Inert Gas Stripping and Gas Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 3212.
21. Trampe, M.; Eckert, C. A. Limiting activity coefficients from an improved differential boiling point technique. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1990, 35, 156.
22. Thomas, E. R.; Newman, B. A.; Long, T. C.; Wood, D. A.; Eckert, C. A. Limiting Activity Coefficients of Nonpolar and Polar Solutes in Both Volatile and Nonvolatile Solvents by Gas Chromatography. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1982, 27, 399.
23. Eckert, C. A.; Newman, B. A.; Nicolaides, G. L.; Long, T. C. Measurement and Application of Limiting Activity Coefficients. AIChE J. 1981, 27, 33.
24. Abrams, D. S.; Prausnitz, J. M. Statistical Thermodynamics of Liquid Mixtures: A New Expression for the Excess Gibbs Energy of Partly or Completely Miscible Systems. AIChE J. 1975, 21, 116.
25. Derr, E. L.; Deal, C. H. Analytical Solution of Groups: Correlation of Activity Coefficients Through Structural Group Parameters. Ind. Chem. Eng., Symp. Ser. No. 32 (Inst. Chem. Eng., London) 1969, 3, 40.
26. Guggenheim, E. A. Mixtures; Clarenden: Oxford, U.K., 1952.
27. Bondi, A. Physical Properties of Molecular Crystals, Liquids, and Glasses; Wiley: New York, 1968.
28. Gmehling, J.; Rasmussen, P.; Fredenslund, A. Vapor-Pressure Equilibria by UNIFAC Group Contribution. Revision and Extension. 2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1982, 21, 118.
29. Bastos, J.; Soares, M.; Medina, A. Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients Predicted by UNIFAC Group Contribution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 1269.
30. Park, J. H.; Carr, P. W. Predictive Ability of the MOSCED and UNIFAC Activity Coefficient Estimation Methods. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 2596.
31. ∞-Based UNIFAC. J. Solution Chem. 1991, 20, 1189.
32. ∞. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 26, 1372.
33. Larsen, B. L.; Rasmussen, P.; Fredenslund, A. A Modified UNIFAC Group-Contribution Model for Prediction of Phase Equilibria and Heats of Mixing. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 26, 2274.
34. Hansen, H. K.; Rasmussen, P.; Fredenslund, A.; Schiller, M.; Gmehling, J. Vapor-liquid Equilibria by UNIFAC Group Contribution. 5. Revision and Extension. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991, 30, 2352.
35. Snyder, L. R.; Kirkland, J. J.; Glajch, J. L. Practical HPLC Method Development; Wiley: New York, 1997.
36. Horvath, Cs.; Melander, W. R.; Molnar, I. Solvophobic Interactions in Liquid Chromatography with Nonpolar Stationary Phases. J. Chromatogr. 1976, 125, 129.
37. Horvath, Cs.; Melander, W. R. Liquid Chromatography with Hydrocarbonaceous Bonded Phases; Theory and Practice of Reversed Phase Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1977, 15, 393.
38. Melander, W. R.; Horvath, Cs. In High Performance Liquid Chromatography: Advances and Perspectives; Horvath, Cs., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1980; Vol. 2, p 201.
39. Carr, P. W.; Li, J.; Dallas, A. J.; Eikens, D. I.; Tan, L. C. Revisionist Look at Solvophobic Driving Forces in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1993, 656, 113.
40. Carr, P. W.; Tan, L. C.; Park, J. H. Revisionist Look at Solvophobic Driving Forces in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography: III. Comparison of the Behavior of Nonpolar and Polar Solutes. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 724, 1.
41. Carr, P. W.; Doherty, R. M.; Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W.; Melander, W.; Horvath, Cs. Study of Temperature and Mobile Phase Effects in Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography by the Use of the Solvatochromic Comparison Method. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 2674.
42. Li, J. W.; Carr, P. W. Evaluation of Temperature Effects on Selectivity in RPLC Separations Using Polybutadiene-Coated Zirconia. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2202.
43. Bolliet, D.; Poole, C. F. Influence of Temperature on Retention and Selectivity in Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography. Analyst 1998, 123, 295.
44. Abraham, M. H.; Roses, M. Hydrogen Bonding. 38. Effect of Solute Structure and Mobile Phase Composition on Reversed-phase High-performance Liquid Chromatographic Capacity Factors. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1994, 7, 672.
45. Tan, L. C.; Carr, P. W.; Abraham, M. H. Study of Retention in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography Using Linear Solvation Energy Relationships: I. The Stationary Phase. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 752, 1.
46. Tan, L. C.; Carr, P. W. Study of Retention in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography Using Linear Solvation Energy Relationships: II. The Mobile Phase. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 799, 1.
47. Lochmuller, C. H.; Reese, C.; Aschman, A. J. Current Strategies for Prediction of Retention in High-performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1993, 656, 3.
48. Snyder, L. R.; Dolan, J. W.; Grant, J. R. Gradient Elution in High-performance Liquid Chromatography: I. Theoretical Basis for Reversed-phase Systems. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 165, 3.
49. Snyder, L. R.; Horvath, Cs. High Performance Liquid Chromatography; Academic Press: New York, 1980; Vol. 1, p 207.
50. Quarry, M. A.; Grob, R. L.; Snyder, L. R. Prediction of Precise Isocratic Retention Data from Two or More Gradient Elution Runs. Analysis of Some Associated Errors. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 907.
51. Jandera, P.; Colin, H.; Guiochon, G. Interaction Indexes for Prediction of Retention in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54, 435.
52. Jandera, P. Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography of Homologous Series: A General Method for Prediction of Retention. J. Chromatogr. 1984, 314, 13.
53. Johnson, B. P.; Khaledi, M. G.; Dorsey, J. G. Solvatochromic Solvent Polarity Measurements and Retention in Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 2354.
54. Dorsey, J. G.; Johnson, B. P. Solvatochromic Measurements of Mobile Phase Composition in Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography-Polarity Values, Retention, and Stationary Phase Information. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1987, 10, 2695.
55. Johnson, B. P.; Khaledi, M. G.; Dorsey, J. G. Solvatochromic Solvent Polarity Measurements and Selectivity in Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 384, 221.
56. Cheong, W. J.; Carr, P. W. Kamlet-Taft π* Polarizability/Dipolarity of Mixtures of Water with Various Organic Solvents. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 820.
57. Braumann, T.; Jastroff, B. Physico-chemical Characterization of Cyclic Nucleotides by Reversed-phase High-performance Liquid Chromatography: II. Quantitative Determination of Hydrophobicity. J. Chromatogr. 1985, 350, 105.
58. Braumann, T. Determination of Hydrophobic Parameters by Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography: Theory, Experimental Techniques, and Application in Studies on Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships. J. Chromatogr. 1986, 373, 191.
59. Valko, K.; Snyder, L. R.; Glajch, J. L. Retention in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography as a Function of Mobile-phase Composition. J. Chromatogr. 1993, 656, 501.
60. Scheonmakers, P. J.; Billiet, H. A. H.; Tijssen, R.; de Galan, L. Gradient Selection in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1978, 149, 519.
61. Tan, L. C. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 1994.
62. Tijssen, R.; Billiet, H. A. H.; Schoenmakers, P. J. Use of the Solubility Parameter for Predicting Selectivity and Retention in Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1976, 122, 185.
63. Weisberg, S. Applied Linear Regression; Wiley: New York, 1980.
64. Dallas, A. J. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 1994.
65. Yonker, C. R.; Zwier, T. A.; Burke, M. F. Comparison of Stationary Phase Formation in RP-18 for Methanol-water Systems. J. Chromatogr. 1982, 241, 257.
66. Yonker, C. R.; Zwier, T. A.; Burke, M. F. Investigation of Stationary Phase Formation for RP-18 Using Various Organic Modifiers. J. Chromatogr. 1982, 241, 269.
67. Martire, D. E.; Boehm, R. E. Unified Theory of Retention and Selectivity in Liquid Chromatography. 2. Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography with Chemically Bonded Phases J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 1045.
68. Dill, K. A. The Mechanism of Solute Retention in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 1980.
69. Dill, K. A.; Naghizadeh, J.; Marqusee, J. A. Chain Molecules at High Densities at Interfaces. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1988, 39, 425.
70. Dorsey, J. G.; Dill, K. A. The Molecular Mechanism of Retention in Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 331.
71. Cheong, W. J.; Carr, P. W. Study of Partition Models in Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography Based on Measured Mobile Phase Solute Activity Coefficients. J. Chromatogr. 1990, 499, 373.
72. Hanai, T.; Hubert, J. Selectivity of a Phenyl-bonded Silica Gel. J. Chromatogr. 1984, 291, 81.
73. Smith, R. M.; Burr, C. M. Retention Prediction of Analytes in Reversed-phase High-performance Liquid Chromatography Based on Molecular Structure: III. Monosubstituted Aliphatic Compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 481, 71.
74. Hanai, T.; Hubert, J. Retention Versus Van der Waals Volume and π energy in Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1984, 290, 197.