Visual search characterized by new metrics for scaling and analysis

Cybernetics and Systems

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 685-707

  Privitera, Claudio M ^a   Stark, Lawrence W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIELD OF REGARD (FOR); FIELD OF VIEW (FOV); REGIONS OF INTEREST (ROI);

ALGORITHMS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; CYBERNETICS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FUNCTIONS; NEUROLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

VISION;

EID: 0344271837     PISSN: 01969722     EISSN: 10876553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/716100278     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderberg, R., 1973. Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.
2. Babcock, M. K., and J. J. Freyd. 1988. Perception of dynamic information in static handwritten forms. American Journal of Psychology, 101:111-130.
3. Bezdek, J. C., and R. P. Nikhil. 1998. Some new index of cluster validity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, 28(3): 301-315.
4. Bock, K. 1985. On some significance tests in clusters analysis. Journal of Classification, 2:77-108.
5. Choi, Y., A. Mosley, and L. W. Stark. 1995. String editing analysis of human visual search. Optometry and Vision Science, 7(7):439-451.
6. Chudnovsky, M. K., and G. V. Chudnovsky. 1989. Search theory. New York: Marcel Dekker.
7. Everitt, B. S. 1979. Unresolved problems in clusters analysis. Biometrics, 35:169-181.
8. Freyd, J. J. 1983. Representing the dynamics of a static form. Memory and Cognition, 11(4):342-346.
9. Hartigan, J. A. 1985. Statistical theory in clustering. Journal of Classification, 2:63-76.
10. Johansson, G. 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(2): 201-211.
11. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.
12. Noton, D., and L. W. Stark. 1971a. Eye movements and visual perception. Scientific American, 224:34-43.
13. Noton, D., and L. W. Stark. 1971b. Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171:308-311.
14. Noton, D., and L. W. Stark. 1971c. Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision Research, 11(9):929-942.
15. Pena, J. M., P. Lozano, and P. Larra naga. 1999. An empirical comparison of four initialization methods for the k-means algorithm. Pattern Recognition Letters, 20:1027-1040.
16. Privitera, C. M., and L. W. Stark. 1998. Evaluating image processing algorithms that predict regions of interest. Pattern Recognition Letters, 19(1):1037-1043.
17. Privitera, C. M., and L. W. Stark. 2000. Algorithms for defining visual region-of-interest: Comparison with eye fixations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(9):970-981.
18. Ray, S., and R. H. Turi. 1998. K-means clustering for color image segmentation with automatic detection of k. Proc. Int. Conf. SIP’98, October 1998, Signal and Image Processing, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 28-31.
19. Sarle, W. S. 1982. Cluster analysis by least squares. Proc. Of the Seventh Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, pp. 651-653.
20. Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density estimation. New York: Chapman and Hall.
21. Stark, L. W., and Y. Choi. 1996. Experimental methaphysics: The scanpath as an epistemological mechanism. In Visual attention and cognition, pp. 3-69, edited by W. H. Zangemeister, H. S. Stiehl, and C. Freksa. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Stark, L. W., G. Yamashita, G. Tharp, and H. X. Ngo. 1996. Keynote lecture: Search patterns and search paths in human search. In Visual search II, pp. 37-57, edited by D. Brogan and K. Carr. London: Taylor and Francis.
23. Stark, L. W., C. M. Privitera, Y. Ho, and M. Azzariti. 1999a. Visual search and display of metrics functionality; experimental results. Technical Report, Electronic Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, M99/22.
24. Stark, L. W., C. M. Privitera, H. Yang, M. Azzariti, Y. F. Ho, T. Blackmon, and D. Chernyak. 2001. Representation of human vision in the brain: How does human perception recognize images? Journal of Electronic Imaging (specialIssue on Human Vision), 10(1):123-151.
25. Stark, L. W., C. M. Privitera, H. Yang, M. Azzariti, F. Yeuk, A. Chan, C. Krischer, and A. Weinberger. 1999b. Scanpath memory binding: Multiple read-out experiments. SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging, January 1999, San Jose, CA, pp. 495-510.
26. Stone, L. D. 1975. Theory of optimal search. New York: Academic Press.
27. Viviani, P., and N. Stucchi. 1992. Motor-perceptual interactions. In Tutorials in motor behavior II, pp. 229-248. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
28. Wong, M. A., and T. Lane. 1983. A kth nearest neighbor clustering procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 45:362-368.
29. Wong, M. A., and C. Schaack. 1982. Using the kth nearest neighbor clustering procedure to determine the number of subpopulations. In Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section, pp. 40-48. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
30. Zimmer, A. 1982. Do we see what makes our script characteristic-Or do we only feel it? Modes of sensory control in handwriting. Psychological Research, 44:165-174.