Why Are Silyl Ethers Conformationally Different from Alkyl Ethers? Chair-Chair Conformational Equilibria in Silyloxycyclohexanes and Their Dependence on the Substituents on Silicon. The Wider Roles of Eclipsing, of 1,3-Repulsive Steric Interactions, and of Attractive Steric Interactions

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 49, 2003, Pages 15163-15173

  Marzabadi, Cecilia H ^a   Anderson, J Edgar ^b   Gonzalez Outeirino, Jorge ^b,d   Gaffney, Piers R J ^b   White, Christopher G H ^b   Tocher, Derek A ^b   Todaro, Louis J ^c  

^a SETON HALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONS; DERIVATIVES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; POTENTIAL ENERGY; SILICON; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

MOLECULAR MECHANICS;

ETHERS;

1,2 DIHYDROXYCYCLOHEXANE; ALKYL ETHER; CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVE; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICON; SILYLOXYCYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SILYLATION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 0344236076     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja035936x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Fleming, I.; Barbero, A.; Walter, D. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2063-2192.
2. Eliel, E. L.; Satici, H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 688-9.
3. (a) Nagao, Y.; Goto, M.; Ochiai, M.; Shiro, M. Chem. Lett. 1990, 1503-1506.
4. (b) Romero, J. A. C.; Tabacco, S. A.; Woerpel, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 168-169.
5. Hosoya, T.; Ohashi, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 663-666.
6. Koslowski, J.; Marzabadi, C.; Rath, N.; Spilling, C. Carbohydr. Res. 1997, 300, 301-313.
7. Walford, C.; Jackson, R. F. W.; Rees, N. H.; Clegg, W.; Heath, S. L. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1855-56.
8. Roush, W. R.; Sebesta, D. P.; Bennett, C. E. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 8825-8836.
9. (a) Ichikawa, S.; Shuto, S.; Matsuda, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10 270-10 280.
10. (b) Shuto, S.; Terauchi, M.; Yahiro, Y.; Abe, H.; Ichikawa, S.; Matsuda, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4151-4155.
11. (c) Matsuda, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11 870-11 882.
12. Calculations for 5 are for the (R,R) configuration shown in Scheme 3, and drawings, torsion angles, and discussion will be in terms of this enantiomer, but experimental results are in fact for racemic 5a-f.
13. (a) Hammarström, L.-G.; Berg, U.; Liljefors, T. J. Chem. Res. (S), 1990, 152.
14. (b) Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley: New York, 1994; Chapter 11.
15. Rockwell, G. D.; Grindley, T. B. Aust. J. Chem. 1996, 49, 379.
16. (a) Zefirov, N. S.; Samoshin, V. V.; Subbotin, O. A.; Baranenkow, V. I.; Wolfe, S. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 2953.
17. (b) Zefirov, N. S.; Samoshin, V. V.; Palyulin, V. A. Zh. Org. Khim. 1983, 19, 1888.
18. (c) Zefirov, N. S.; Zelenkina, O. A.; Subbotin, O. A.; Samoshin, V. V. Zh. Org. Khim. 1987, 23, 1122.
19. (a) Kirby, A. J. The Anomeric Effect and Related Stereoelectronic Effects at Oxygen; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1983.
20. (b) Deslongchamps, P. Stereoelectronic Effects in Organic Chemistry; Pergamon: Oxford, 1983.
21. (c) Juaristi, E.; Cuevas, G. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 5019.
22. (d) Thatcher, G. R. J. The Anomeric Effect and Associated Stereoelectronic Effects; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1993.
23. (e) Graczyk, P. P.; Mikolajczyk, M. Topics Stereochem. 1994, 21, 159.
24. Anderson, J. E.; Ijeh, A. I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 1965.
25. Anderson, J. E.; Khan, S., unpublished results cited elsewhere.
26. Anderson, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3511-3513.
27. Wiedenfeld, D. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 339.
28. The Development of Versions 3 and 4 of the Cambridge Structural Database System. Allen, F. H.; Davies, J. E.; Galloy, J. J.; Johnson, O.; Kennard, O.; Maccrae, C. F.; Mitchell, E. M.; Mitchell, G. F.; Smith, J. M.; Watson, D. G. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1991, 31, 187-204. July 1991 CSD Release.
29. Allinger, N. L.; Rahman, M.; Lii, J.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8293.
30. Chen, K.; Allinger, N. L. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 110, 697.
31. (a) For discussion of the conformations within a trisisopropylsilyl group, for example: Anderson, J. E.; Casarini, D.; Lunazzi, L.; Mazzanti, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1729-1737.
32. (b) Anderson, J. E.; Koon, K. H.; Parkin, J. E. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 561-567.
33. A referee has pointed out that the dielectric constant of dichloromethane is given as 9 at 293 K and 16 at 180 K in the CRC Handbook, so the improved agreement with experiment may be valid, but it is not clear whether solvent can dominate the dielectrics within a single molecule.
34. Senderowitz, H.; Abramson, S.; Aped, P.; Schleifer, L.; Fuchs, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 6765-6768.
35. In compound 1a, calculations suggest that the maximum and minimum separation of two hydrogen atoms H-C-Si⋯C4-H is 9.04 and 6.25Å in the equatorial conformation, whereas these limits are only 8.00 and 5.92 Å in the axial conformation.