Desiderata for product labeling of medical expert systems

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 153-163

  Geissbühler, Antoine ^a   Miller, Randolph A ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Desiderata; Medical expert systems; Product labeling

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EXPERT SYSTEMS; WIDE AREA NETWORKS;

MEDICAL EXPERT SYSTEMS; PRODUCT LABELING;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EXPERT SYSTEM; INTERNET; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; NOMENCLATURE; PACKAGING; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKILL; STANDARD; TRAINING;

EID: 0344222222     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1386-5056(97)00099-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Miller R.A., Schaffner K.F., Meisel A. Ethical and legal issues related to the use of computer programs in clinical medicine. Ann. Intern. Med. 192:1985;529-536.
2. Federal Register. 61(136) July 15 (1996) 36886-7.
3. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh (1996-1997).
4. Young F.E. Validation of medical software: Present policy of the food and drug administration. Ann. Intern. Med. 106:1987;628-629.
5. Brannigan V. The regulation of medical computer software as a 'device' under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 25:1987;219-228.
6. USPHS DHHS FDA CDRH ODE: Blue Book Memorandum, #G-91-1, Device Labeling Guidance, March 8, 1991.
7. Schoolman H.M. Obligations of the expert system builder: Meeting the needs of the user. MD Comput. 8(5):1991;316-321.
8. Teach R.L., Shonliffe E.H. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Comput. Biomed. Res. 14:1981;542-558.
9. McDonald C.J. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the nonperfectability of man. New Engl. J. Med. 295:1976;1351-1355.
10. E.H. Shortliffe, Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN, Artificial Intelligence Series, Elsevier Computer Science Library, New York, 1976.
11. Warner H.R., Toronto A.F., Veasey L.G., Stephenson R.A. Mathematical approach to medical diagnosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 177:1961;75-81.
12. de Dombal F.T., Hartley J.R., Sleeman D.H. A computer-assisted system for learning clinical diagnosis. Lancet. 1:1969;145-148.
13. Ben-Bassat M., Carlson R.W., Puri V.K., Davenport M.D., Schriver J.A.et al. Pattern-based interactive diagnosis of multiple disorders: The MEDAS system. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. PAMI-2:1980;148-160.
14. Mulsant B.H. A neural network as an approach to clinical diagnosis. MD Comput. 7:1990;25-26.
15. Hart A., Wyatt J. Evaluating black-boxes as medical decision aids; Issues arising from a study of neural networks. Med. Inf. (Lond.). 15:1990;229-236.
16. P.H. Haddawy, J. Jacobson, C.E. Kahn, Generating explanations and tutorial problems from Bayesian networks, in: Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1994, pp. 770-774.
17. Miller R.A., Masarie F.E. The demise of the 'Greek Oracle' model for medical diagnostic systems. Methods Inf. Med. 29:1990;1-2.
18. Miller R.A., Masarie F.E., Myers J.D. Quick medical reference (QMR) for diagnostic assistance. MD Comput. 3:1986;34-48.
19. Miller R.A., Pople H.E., Myers J.D. Internist-I, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. New Engl. J. Med. 207:1982;468-476.
20. Masarie F.E., Miller R.A., Bouhaddou O., Giuse N.B., Warner H.R. An interlingua for electronic interchange of medical information: Using frames to map between clinical vocabularies. Comput. Biomed. Res. 24:1991;379-400.
21. R.A. Miller, F.E. Masarie, The quick medical reference (QMR) relationships function: Description and evaluation of a simple, efficient 'Multiple Diagnoses' algorithm, in: MEDINFO 92. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 512-518.
22. Berman L., Miller R.A. Problem area formation as an element of computer aided diagnosis: A comparison of two strategies within quick medical reference (QMR). Methods Inf. Med. 30:1991;90-95.
23. Baxt W.G., Skora J. Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 347:1996;12-15.
24. R.M. Sailors, R.D. East, C.J. Wallace, D.A. Carlson, et al., Testing and validation of computerized decision support models, in: Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, 1996, pp. 234-238.