African‐American women making themselves: Notes on the role of black feminist research?

Souls

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 18-29

  Mullings, Leith ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344219736     PISSN: 10999949     EISSN: 15483843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10999940009362233     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Leith Mullings, On Our Own Terms: Race, Class and Gender in the Lives of African American Women (New York: Routledge, 1997).
2. William J. Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
3. Patricia Hill Collins, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (New York: Routledge, 1991).
4. Angela Davis, Women, Race and Class (New York: Routledge, 1981).
5. Rose M. Brewer, “Theorizing Race, Class and Gender: The New Scholarship of Black Feminist Intellectuals and Black Women’s Labor,” in Stanlie lames and Abena Busia, eds., Theorizing Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women (London: Routledge, 1993), p. 236.
6. Marjorie L. DeVault, ‘Talking Back to Sociology: Distinctive Contributions of Feminist Methodology,” Annual Review of Sociology (Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc.), Vol. 22 (1996), pp. 29-50.
7. Ida Susser, “Political Activity Among Working Class Women in a U.S. City,” American Ethnologist, Vol. 13, no. 1 (1986), pp. 108-117;
8. Sandra Morgen and Ann Bookman, “Rethinking Women and Politics: An Introductory Essay,” in Ann Bookman and Sandra Morgen, eds., Women and the Politics of Empowerment (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988).
9. Kathryn Anderson et al., “Beginning Where We Are: Feminist Methodology in Oral History,” Oral History Review, Vol. 15 (1987), pp. 103-127.
10. Joyce Nielson, “Introduction,” in Joyce Nielson, ed., Feminist Research Methods (Boulder: Westview Press, 1990), p. 10.
11. James Clifford and George Marcus, eds., Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1985);
12. Judith Stacy, “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?” in Shema Berger Gluck and Daphne Patai, eds., Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History (New York: Routledge, 1991).
13. Frances E. Mascia-Lees, Patricia Sharpe, and Colleen Ballerino Cohen, “The Postmodernist Turn in Anthropology: Cautions from a Feminist Perspective,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 15, no. 1 (1989).
14. Peter Park, “What Is Participatory Research? A Theoretical and Methodological Perspective,” in Peter Park et al., eds., Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the U.S. and Canada (Westport, Conn.: Bergen and Garvey, 1993).
15. Jean J. Schensul and Donald D. Stull, Collaborative Research and Social Change: Applied Anthropology in Action (Boulder and London: Westview Press, 1987).
16. Leith Mullings and Alaka Wali, Stress and Resistance: The Social Context of Reproduction in Central Harlem (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, forthcoming November 2000).
17. Manning Marable, “Black Studies.” Race and Reason, Vol. 4 (1997), pp. 3-8.
18. Sherry Gorelick, “Contradictions of Feminist Methodology,” in Heidi Gottfried, ed„ Feminism and Social Change: Bridging Theory and Practice (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1996), pp. 23-46; quote from p. 27.
19. Roger Sanjek, “Anthropological Work at a Gray Panther Health Clinic: Academic, Applied, and Advocacy Goals,” in Leith Mullings, ed., Cities of the United States (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987).
20. Jacques Hamel, “The Positions of Pierre Bourdieu and Alain Touraine Respecting Qualitative Methods,” British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 49, no. 1 (1998).
21. Maria Mies, ‘Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research,” in Gloria Bowles and Renate Duelli Klein, eds., Theories of Women's Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983), pp. 117-139.