Delaying Justice: The Supreme Court's Decision to Hear Rearguments

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 351-360

  Hoekstra, Valerie ^a   Johnson, Timothy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344197585     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290305600309     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baum, Lawrence. 2001. The Supreme Court, 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2. Brenner, Saul. 1980. "Fluidity on the United States Supreme Court: A Reexamination," American Journal of Political Science 24 (3): 526-35.
3. Brown v. Board of Education. 1954. 347 U.S. 483.
4. Caldeira, Gregory A., John R. Wright, and Christopher J. W. Zorn. 1999. "Sophisticated Voting and Gate-Keeping in the Supreme Court." Journal of law. Economics, and Organization 15 (3): 549-72.
5. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington DC: CQ Press.
6. Epstein, Lee, and Joseph Kobylka. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
7. Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. "Measuring Issue Salience." American Journal of Political Science 44 (January): 66-83.
8. Epstein, Lee, Valerie Hoekstra, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1998. "Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices." Journal of Politics 60 (August): 801-18.
9. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey Segal, Harold Spaeth, and Thomas Walker. 1996. The Supreme Court Compendium, 2nd ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.
10. Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 2001. Constitutional Law For a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
11. Gibbons, Robert. 1992. Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Hagle, Timothy M. 1993. "Freshman Effects' for Supreme Court Justices." American Journal of Political Science 37 (November): 1142-57.
13. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Howard, J. Woodford, Jr. 1968. "On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice." American Political Science Review 65 (March): 43-56.
15. Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha. 1983. 462 U.S. 919.
16. Johnson, Timothy R. 2001. "Information, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making." American Politics Research 29 (July): 331-51.
17. _. 2003. "The Supreme Court, the Solicitor General, and the Separation of Powers." American Politics Research 31 (July): 426-51.
18. King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2001a. "Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data." Political Analysis 9 (Spring): 137-63.
19. _. 2001b. "Explaining Rare Events in International Relations." International Organization 55 (September): 693-715.
20. Krimbel, Rosemary. 1989. "Rehearing Sua Sponte in the U.S. Supreme Court: A Procedure for Judicial Policymaking. Chicago-Kent Law Review 65: 919-46.
21. Lazarus, Edward. 1999. Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modem Supreme Court. New York: Penguin Press.
22. Maltzman, Forrest, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1996. "Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court." American Political Science Review 90: 581-92.
23. Maltzman, Forrest, James E Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: the Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Murphy, Walter F. 1964. The Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. O'Brien, David. 2000. Storm Center. New York: Norton.
26. Roe v. Wade. 1973. 140 U.S. 113.
27. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. _. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Shapirov. Thompson. 1969. 394U.S. 618.
30. Sony Corporationv. Universal City Studios. 1984.464U.S. 417.
31. Spaeth, HaroldJ. 1999. Expanded United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1946-1968. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
32. _. 2001. The Burger Court Judicial Database 1969-1985 Terms). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
33. Spriggs, James E II, Forrest Maltzman, and PaulJ. Wahlbeck. 1999. "Bargaining on theU.S. Supreme Court: Justices' Responses to Majority Opinion Drafts." Journal of Politics 61 (May): 485-506.
34. Spriggs, James F II, and PaulJ. Wahlbeck. 1997. 1997. "Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court." Political Research Quarterly 50 (June): 365-86.
35. Stern, Robert, Eugene Gressman, and Stephen Shapiro and Kenneth Geller. 1993. Supreme Court Practice. Washington DC: Bureau of Government Affairs.
36. Tomz, Michael, Gary King, and Langche Zeng. 1999. RELOGIT: Rare Events Logistic Regression, version1.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, http://gking.harvard.edu/
37. Wasby, StephenL., AnthonyA. D'Amato, and Rosemary Metrailer. 1977. "Desegregation from Brown to Alexander: An Exploration of Supreme Court Strategies." Carbondale and Edwardsville IL: Southern Illinois University Press:
38. White, ByronR. 1983. Letter to Chief Justice Burger, June 28. Papers of Justice WilliamJ. Brennan. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Manuscript Division.
39. Wood, SandraL., Linda Camp Keith, Drew Noble Lanier, Ayo Ogudele. 1998. "Acclimation Effects' for Supreme Court Justices: A Cross-Validation, 1888-1940." American Journal of Political Science 42 (April): 690-97.
40. Woodward Bob, and Scott Armstrong. 1979. The Brethren. New York: Simon and Schuster.