Development of an adjustable prosthesis for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: Preliminary results in a porcine model

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 140-143

  Carugno, Francesco ^a   Donohue, John H ^a,b   Moreno, Eduardo ^a   Byrne, John ^a   Hodge, David O ^b   Ilstrup, Duane M ^b   Sarr, Michael G ^a  

^a Department of Surgery ^*  (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; GASTROENTEROLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; SILICONES;

ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; DEVICE; ESOPHAGUS PRESSURE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; NONHUMAN; SWINE;

EID: 0344193642     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199805000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Sivri B, McCallum RW: What has the surgeon to know about pathophysiology of reflux disease? World J Surg 16: 294-299, 1992.
2. DeMeester TR, Wernly JA, Bryant GH, Little AG, Skinner DB: Clinical and in vitro analysis of determinants of gastroesophageal competence: a study of the principles of antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 137: 39-46, 1979.
3. Katz PO: Pathogenesis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 13(suppl 2): S6-S15, 1991.
4. Cohen S: The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a challenge in clinical physiology. Ann Intern Med 117: 1051-1052, 1992.
5. O'Sullivan GC, DeMeester TR, Joelsson BE, et al: Interaction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length of sphincter in the abdomen as determinants of gastroesophageal competence. Am J Surg 143: 40-47, 1982.
6. Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA: Outpatient physiologic testing and surgical management of foregut motility disorders in, Wells Jr SA (ed), Current Problems in Surgery, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, 1992.
7. Stein HJ, DeMeester TR: Who benefits from antireflux surgery? World J Surg 16: 313-319, 1992.
8. Ellis FH Jr: The Nissen fundoplication. Ann Thorac Surg 54: 1231-1235, 1992.
9. Hill LD: An effective operation for hiatal hernia: an eight year appraisal. Ann Surg 166: 681-690, 1967.
10. Boutelier P, Jonsell G: An alternative funduplicative maneuver for gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Surg 143: 260-264, 1982.
11. Angelchik JP, Cohen R: A new surgical procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148: 246-248, 1979.
12. Nathanson LK, Shimi S, Cushieri A: Laparoscopic ligamentum teres (round ligament) cardiopexy. Br J Surg 78: 947-951, 1991.
13. Pope CE II: The quality of life following antireflux surgery. World J Surg 16: 355-358, 1992.
14. Rieger NA, Jamieson GG, Britten-Jones R, Tew S: Reoperation after failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 81: 1159-1161, 1994.
15. DeMeester TR, Johnson LF, Kent AH: Evaluation of current operations for the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux. Ann Surg 180: 511-522, 1974.
16. Taylor TV: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 82: 579-581, 1995.
17. Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Naspetti R, Jamieson J, Perry RE: Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 214: 374-383, 1991.
18. Bemelman WA, Van Der Hulst VPM, Dukhuis T, vanDer Hoeven CWP, Klopper PJ: The lower esophageal sphincter shown by a computerized representation. Scand J Gastroenterol 25: 601-608, 1990.
19. Stein HJ, Liebermann-Meffert D, DeMeester TR, Siewert JR: Three-dimensional pressure image and muscular structure of the human lower esophageal sphincter. Surgery 117: 692-698, 1995.
20. Bombeck CT, Vaz O, DeSalvo J, Donahue PE, Nyhus LM: Computerized axial manometry of the esophagus: a new method for the assessment of antireflux operations. Ann Surg 206: 465-472, 1987.
21. Perry ER, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Attwood SEA: Manometric diagnosis of anal sphincter injuries. Am J Surg 159: 112-117, 1990.
22. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH: One factor repeated measures analysis of variance, in Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (eds), Applied Linear Statistical Models, Homewood, IL, 1985, pp. 948-952, IRWIN.
23. Bancroft TA: Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison, in Bancroft TA (ed), Topic in Intermediate Statistical Methods, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 1968, pp. 163-169.
24. Stewart KC, Urschel JD, Hallgren RA: Reoperation for complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 57: 1557-1558, 1994.
25. Thibault C, Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque R, Beland L, Potvin M: The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: Long-term clinical and technical follow-up. Can J Surg 37: 12-17, 1994.
26. Morris DL, Jones J, Evans DF, et al: Reflux versus dysphagia: an objective evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis. Br J Surg 72: 1017-1020, 1985.
27. Timoney AG, Welfare MR, Kelly JM: The Angelchik antireflux device: a 5-year experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72: 185-187, 1990.
28. Kmiot WA, Kirby RM, Akinola D, Temple JG: Prospective randomized trial of Nissen funduplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 78: 1181-1184, 1991.
29. Wale RJ, Royston CMS, Bennett JR, Buckton GK: Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis. Br J Surg 72: 520-524, 1985.
30. Robertson CS, Smart H, Amar SS, Morris DL: Oesophageal transit of marshmallow after the Angelchik procedure. Br J Surg 76: 245-247, 1989.
31. Leguit P Jr, Hagen WBA, Loarman J: The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia. The Netherlands Journal of Surgery 39: 86-89, 1987.
32. Kozarek RA, Brayko CM, Sanowski JL, et al: Evaluation of Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: long-Term results. Dig Dis Sci 30: 723-732, 1985.
33. Berguer R, Stiegman GV, Yamamoto M, Kim J: Minimal access surgery for gastroesophageal reflux: laparoscopic placement of the Angelchik prosthesis in pigs. Surg Endosc 5: 123-126, 1991.
34. Benjamin SB, Knuff TK, Fink M, Woods E, Castell DO: The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of primates. Ann Surg 197: 63-67, 1983.
35. Lipshutz W, Cohen S: Physiological determinants of the lower esophageal sphincter function. Gastroenterology 61: 16-24, 1971.
36. Durrans D, Armstrong CP, Taylor TV: The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis - some reservations. Br J Surg 72: 525-527, 1985.5