A distance measure based on binary character data and its application to phylogeny reconstruction

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 449-469

  Schmidt, W ^a   Muller E Ch ^a  

^a MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344192163     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02460592     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bandelt, H.-J. and A. W. M. Dress, 1993. A relational approach to split decomposition. In Information Systems and Data Analysis. Prospects, Foundations, Applications, H. H. Bock, W. Lenski, and M. M. Richter (Eds). Berlin: Springer.
2. Bork, P. and Ch. Grunwald, 1990. Recognition of different nucleotide binding sites in primary structure using a property pattern approach. Eur. J. Biochem. 191, 347-358.
3. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32, 550-570.
4. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum-likelihood and minimum steps methods for evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Zool. 22, 240-249.
5. Feng, D.-F. and R. F. Doolittle. 1987. Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. J. Mol. Evol. 25, 351-360.
6. Fitch, W. M. and E. Margoliash. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 15, 279-284.
7. Fredman, M. L. 1984. Computing evolutionary similarity measures with length independent gap penalties. Bull. Math. Biol. 46, 553-566.
8. GCG: Program Manual for the GCG package, version 7.3, 1993.
9. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple model for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 111-120.
10. Kishino, H. and M. Hasegawa, 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29, 170-179.
11. Klotz, L. C. and R. L. Blanken, 1981. A practical method for calculating evolutionary trees from sequence data. J. Theor. Biol. 91, 261-272.
12. Moore, G. M., M. Goodman, and J. Barnabas. 1973. An iterative approach from the standpoint of the additive hypothesis to the dendrogram problem posed by molecular data sets. J. Theor. Biol. 38, 423-457.
13. Penny, D. and M. Hendy. 1986. Estimating the reliability of evolutionary trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3, 403-417.
14. Sankoff, D., R. J. Cedergren, and W. M. McKay. 1982. A strategy for sequence phylogeny research. Nucl. Acids Res. 10, 421-431.
15. Schmidt, W. 1993. Multiple alignment of protein sequences and construction of evolutionary tress based on amino acid properties - An algebraic approach. Information Systems and Data Analysis. Prospects, Foundations, Applications, H. H. Bock, W. Lenski, and M. M. Richter (Eds). Berlin: Springer.
16. Schmidt, W. 1995. Phylogeny reconstruction for protein sequences based on amino acid properties. J. Mol. Evol., 41, 522-530.
17. Sellers, P. H. 1974. Evolutionary distances. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 26, 787-793.
18. Swofford, D. L. 1991. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 3.05. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey. Champaign, IL, USA.
19. Tateno, Y., M. Nei, and F. Tajima. 1982. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species. J. Mol. Evol. 18, 387-404.
20. Taylor, W. R. 1986. Identification of protein-sequence homology by consensus template. J. Mol. Biol. 188, 233-258.
21. Vodkin, M. H., V. R. Gordon, and G. L. McLaughlin. 1993. A ribosomal protein in Acanthamoeba polyphaga is conserved in eukaryotic nuclei organelles and bacteria. Gene 131, 141-144.
22. Waterman, M. S. and T. F. Smith. 1978. On the similarity of dendrograms. J. Theor. Biol. 73, 789-800.
23. Waterman, M. S., T. F. Smith, M. Singh, and W. A. Beyer. 1977. Additive evolutionary trees. J. Theor. Biol. 64, 199-213.