Characterization of sugar beet sheedbed structure

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1377-1384

  Aubertot, J N ^a   Durr C ^a   Kieu K ^a   Richard, G ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; CROPS; CULTIVATION; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; PHOTOGRAPHY; VEGETATION;

SILT LOAM SOILS; STEREOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; SUGAR BEET STRUCTURE;

SILT;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 0344182932     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1999.6351377x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Addiscott, T.M., and A.R. Dexter. 1994. Tillage and crop residue management effects on losses of chemicals from soils. Soil Tillage Res. 30:125-168.
2. Boiffin, J., P. Dubrulle, C. Dürr, G. Richard, and Y. Duval. 1994. Modelling sugarbeet seedling emergence and early growth. p. 1143-1148. In Proc. International Soil Tillage Research Organization (ISTRO) Conf., 13th, Aalborg, Denmark. 24-29 July 1994. ISTRO, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
3. Bouaziz, A., and L. Bruckler. 1989. Modeling wheat seedling growth and emergence: II. Comparison with field experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:1838-1846.
4. Bresson, L.M., and J. Boiffin. 1990. Morphological characterization of soil crust development stages on an experimental field. Geoderma 47:305-325.
5. Dexter, A.R. 1985. Shapes of aggregates from tilled layers of some dutch and australian soils. Geoderma 35:91-107.
6. Dexter, A.R. 1991. Statistical structure of tilled soil as determined by image analysis of sections. Div. Note DN 1609, AFRC Inst. Eng. Res., Agriculture and Food Research Center, Silsoe, UK.
7. Dürr, C., J. Boiffin, A. Fleury, and I. Coulomb. 1992. Analysis of the variability of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growth during the early stages. II. Factors influencing seedling size in field conditions. Agronomie 12:527-535.
8. Durrant, M.J., R.A. Dunning, K.W. Jaggard, R.B. Bugg, and R.K. Scott. 1988. A census of seedling establishment in sugar-beet crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 113:327-345.
9. Kemper, W.D., and W.S. Chepil. 1965. Size distribution of aggregates in methods of soil analysis. p. 499-510. In C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. ASA, Madison, WI.
10. Kozak, E., Ya.A. Pachepsky, S. Sokolowski, Z. Sokolowska, and W. Stepniewski. 1996. A modified number-based method for estimating fragmentation fractal dimensions of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:1291-1297.
11. Kritz, G. 1983. Såbäddar för vårstråsäd. En stickprovsundersökning. Division of Soil Management, Report No. 65, Swedish Univ. Agric. Sci., Uppsala.
12. Pachepsky, Ya., D. Giménez, S. Logsdon, R.R. Allmaras, and E. Kozak. 1997. On interpretation and misinterpretation of fractal models: A reply to "Comment on number-size distributions, soil structure, and fractals." Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:1800-1801.
13. Perfect, E. 1997. Fractal models for the fragmentation of rocks and soils: a review. Eng. Geol. 48:185-198.
14. Perfect, E., V. Rasiah, and B.D. Kay. 1992. Fractal dimensions of soil aggregate-size distributions calculated by number and mass. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:1407-1409.
15. Perfect, E., and R.L. Blevins. 1997. Fractal characterization of soil aggregation and fragmentation as influenced by tillage treatment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:896-900.
16. Perfect, E., Q. Zhai, and R.L. Blevins. 1997. Soil and tillage effects on the characteristic size and shape of aggregates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:1459-1465.
17. Protz R., M.J. Shipitalo, A.R. Mermut, and C.A. Fox. 1987. Image analysis of soils - present and future. Geoderma 40:115-125.
18. Richard, G., and C. Dürr. 1997. Conséquence de l'état du profil cultural sur les peuplements végétaux: réussite de la levée en relation avec l'état du lit de semences. p. 49-54. In R. Pirot et al. (ed.) Le travail du sol dans les sytèmes mécanisés tropicaux, Montpellier. 11-12 Sept. 1996. CIRAD, Montpellier, France.
19. Sandri, R., T. Anken, T. Hilfiker, L. Sartori, and H. Bollhader. 1998. Comparison of methods for determining cloddiness in seedbed preparation. Soil Tillage Res. 45:57-64.
20. Souty, N., and C. Rode. 1993. Emergence of sugar beet seedlings from under different obstacles. Eur. J. Agron. 2(3):213-221.
21. Steude, J.S., and F. Hopkins. 1994. Industrial X-ray computed tomography applied to soil research. In Tomography of soil-water-root processes. SSSA Spec. Publ. 36. SSSA, Madison, WI.
22. Turcotte, D.L. 1986. Fractals and fragmentation. J. Geophys. Res. 91:1921-1926.
23. Van Bavel, C.H.M. 1949. Mean weight diameter of soil aggregates as a statistical index of aggregation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 14:20-23.
24. Wagner, L.E., and D. Ding. 1994. Representing aggregate size distributions as modified lognormal distributions. Trans. ASAE 37:815-821.
25. Wang, C., and P.D. Komar. 1985. The sieving of heavy mineral sands. J. Sediment. Petrol. 55:479-482.
26. Wicksell, S.D. 1925. The corpuscule problem. A mathematical study of biometric problem. Biometrika 17:84.
27. Young, I.M., J.W. Crawford, A. Anderson, and A. McBratney. 1997. Comment on number-size distributions, soil structure and fractals. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:1799-1800.