Determination of the relative impact of chromatographic conditions and solute structures on the retention behaviour of non-ionic surfactants in RP-HPLC

Biomedical Chromatography

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 225-228

  Balcan, Marieta ^a,b   Cserháti, Tibor ^a   Forgáes, Esther ^a   Anghel, Dan Florin ^b  

^a CTRL RES INSTITUTE FOR CHEMISTRY   (Hungary)

^b INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; ETHYLENE; HYDROPHOBICITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILICA; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS; ETHYLENE OXIDES; HYDROPHOBIC MOIETIES; NON-IONIC SURFACTANTS; ORGANIC MODIFIER; RELATIVE IMPACT; RETENTION BEHAVIOR; RP-HPLC; SOLUTE STRUCTURES; STEPWISE REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CHAINS;

ACETONITRILE; CARBON; ETHYLENE OXIDE; LIGAND; METHANOL; NONIONIC SURFACTANT; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; HYDROPHOBICITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVERSED PHASE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; TEMPERATURE;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 0344171948     PISSN: 02693879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0801(199905)13:3<225::AID-BMC824>3.0.CO;2-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ammar, H. O. and Omar, S. M. 1994. Pharmazie 49:746.
2. Best, G. A. and Ruthven, A. D., (Eds) 1995. Pesticides - Development, Impacts and Control, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.
3. Bollig, J. J., Seiler, J. R., Zedaker, S. M., Thompson, J. W. and Lucero, D. 1995. Can. J. Forest Res. 25:425.
4. Cserháti, T. 1994. Anal. Lett. 27:2615.
5. Cserháti, T. and Forgács, E. 1997. J. Chromatogr. A 774:265.
6. Forney, C. E. and Glatz, C. E. 1995. Biotechnol. Progr. 11:260.
7. Gallova, J., Bagelova, J., Balgavy, P. and Cizmarik, J. 1993. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 12:357.
8. Hofland, H. E. J., Bowstra, J. A., Verhoef, J. C., Buckton, G. G., Chowdry, B. Z., Ponec, M. and Junginger, H. E. 1992. J. Pharm. Pharmac. 44:287.
9. Huang, Y. C., Batchelor, B. and Koseoglu, S. S. 1994. Hazard. Waste Hazard. Mater. 11:385.
10. Kallioinen, S., Helenius, K. and Yliruusi, J. 1994. Pharmazie 49:750.
11. Kiewiet, A. T. and de Voogt, P. 1996. J. Chromatogr. A 733:185.
12. Korting, H. C., Schindler, S., Hartinger, A., Kerscher, M., Angerpointner, T. and Maibach, H. I. 1994. Life Sci. 55:533.
13. Lafosse, M., Marinier, P., Joseph, B. and Dreux, M. 1996. J. Chromatogr. 623:277.
14. Lewis, R. W., McCall, J. C., Botham, P. A. and Trebilcock, R. 1994. Toxicol. in Vitro 8:867.
15. Mager, H., Moderne Regressionsanalyse, Salle, Sauerlander, Frankfurt-am-Main, 1982, p. 135.
16. Marcomini, A. and Zanette, M. 1996. J. Chromatogr. A 733:193.
17. Marcomini, A., Capri, S. and Giger, W. 1987. J. Chromatogr. 403:243.
18. Park, J. W. and Jaffe, P. R. 1995. J. Environ. Engng ASCE 121:430.
19. Riechers, D. E., Wax, L. M., Liebl, R. A. and Bullock, D. G. 1995. Weed Technol. 9:281.
20. Torslov, J. and Lindgaard-Jorgensen, P. 1994. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 29:86.
21. Volkering, F., Breuere, A. M., van Andel, J. G. and Rulkens, W. H. 1995. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1699.
22. Wilhelm, K. P., Freitag, G. and Wolff, H. H. 1994. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 31:981.