Acquisition and retention in compound matching with hue and peck number elements

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 354-371

  Fetterman, J Gregor ^a   MacEwen, David ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344154583     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00034-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blough, D. S. (1959). Delayed matching in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 151-160.
2. Bowers, R. L., & Richards, R. W. (1990). Pigeons' short-term memory for temporal and visual stimuli in delayed matching-to-sample. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 23-28.
3. Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Autoshaping of the pigeon's keypeck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1-8.
4. Brown, M. F., & Morrison, S. K. (1990). Element and compounding matching-to-sample performance in pigeons: The roles of information load and training history. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 185-192.
5. Carter, D. E., & Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565-601.
6. Cohen, L. R., Looney, T. A, Brady, J. H., & Aucella, A. F. (1976). Differential sample response schedules in the acquisition of conditional discriminations by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 301-314.
7. Fetterman, J. G. (1993). Numerosity discrimination: Both time and number matter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 149-164.
8. Fetterman, J. G. (2000). Biases in pigeon working memory. Animal Learning and Behavior, 28, 68-79.
9. Fetterman, J. G., & MacEwen, D. (1989). Short-term memory for responses: The "choose-small" effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 311-324.
10. Grant, D. S. (1976). Effects of sample presentation time on long-delay matching in the pigeon. Learning and Motivation, 7, 580-590.
11. Grant, D. S. (1982). Prospective versus retrospective coding of samples of stimuli, responses, and reinforcers in delayed matching with pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 13, 265-280.
12. Grant, D. S. (1991). Symmetrical and asymmetrical coding of food and no-food samples in delayed matching in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 186-193.
13. Grant, D. S., & Spetch, M. L. (1993). Analogical and nonanalogical coding of samples differing in duration in a choice-matching task in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 15-25.
14. Kendrick, D. F., & Rilling, M. (1986). Theories of animal memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Lydersen, T., & Perkins, D. (1974). Effects of response-produced stimuli on conditional discrimination performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 307-314.
16. Lydersen, T., Perkins, D., & Chairez, H. (1977). Effects of fixed-ratio sample and choice response requirements upon oddity matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 97-101.
17. Maki, W. S., & Leith, C. R. (1973). Shared attention in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 345-349.
18. Maki, W. S., Riley, D. A., & Leith, C. R. (1976). The role of test stimuli in matching to compound samples of pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4, 13-21.
19. Paul, C. (1983). Sample-specific ratio effects in matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 77-85.
20. Premack, D. (1978). On the abstractness of human concepts: Why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 423-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Roberts, W. A., & Grant, D. S. (1976). Studies of short-term memory in the pigeon using the delayed matching-to-sample procedure. In D. L. Medin, W. A. Roberts, & R. T. Davis (Eds.), Processes of animal memory (pp. 79-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Roberts, W. A., Macuda, T., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1995). Memory for number of light flashes in pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 23, 182-188.
23. Sacks, R. A., Kamil, A. C., & Mack, R. (1972). The effects of fixed-ratio sample requirements on matching-to-sample in the pigeon. Psychonomic Science, 26, 291-293.
24. Santi, A., Bridson, S., & Ducharme, M. J. (1993). Memory codes for temporal and nontemporal samples in many-to-one matching by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 21, 120-130.
25. Sherburne, L. M., & Zentall, T. R. (1993). Asymmetrical coding of food and no-food events by pigeons: Sample pecking versus food as the basis of the sample code. Learning and Motivation, 21, 141-155.
26. Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193-216.
27. Urcuioli, P. J., DeMarse, T., & Zentall, T. R. (1994). Some properties of many-to-one matching with hue, response, and food samples: Retention and mediated transfer. Learning and Motivation, 25, 175-200.
28. Urcuioli, P. J., & Honig, W. K. (1980). Stimulus control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 251-277.
29. Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., Jackson-Smith, P., & Steirn, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264-273.
30. Wixted, J. T., & Dougherty, D. H. (1996). Memory for asymmetric events. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 35, pp. 89-126). San Diego: Academic Press.