Applying the health promotion model to development of a worksite intervention

American Journal of Health Promotion

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 219-227

  Lusk, Sally L ^a,d   Eakin, Brenda L ^a   Kerr, Madeleine J ^b   Ronis, David L ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Occupational Health Nursing Program   (United States)

Author keywords

Health promotion model; Hearing protector use; Predictor based training; Predictors of behavior; Worksite intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EAR PROTECTION; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; UTILIZATION REVIEW; WORKPLACE;

EID: 0344141545     PISSN: 08901171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.4.219     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McAfee RB, Winn AR. The use of incentives/ feedback to enhance workplace safety: a critique of the literature. J Safety Res 1989;20: 7-19.
2. Fishbein M, Bandura A. Triandis HC, et al. Factors Influencing Behavior and Behavior Change: Final Report: Theorist's Workshop. Washington, DC, 1991.
3. Goldenhar LM, Schulte PA. Intervention research in occupational health and safety. J Occup Med 1994;36:763-75.
4. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Kerr MJ. Predictors of workers' use of hearing protection. Hum Factors 1995;37:635-40.
5. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, et al. Standardized, individualized interactive and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol 1993;12: 399-405.
6. Velicer WT, Prochaska JO, Bellis JM, et al. An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Addict Behav 1993;18:269-90.
7. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. National Occupational Research Agenda. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996.
8. Cohen S, Weinstein N. Nonauditory effects of noise on behavior and health. J Soc Issues 1984;37:36-70.
9. DeJoy DM. The nonauditory effects of noise: review and perspectives for research. J Aud Res 1984;24:123-50.
10. Sloan RP. Cardiovascular effects of noise. In: Fay TH, editor. Noise and Health. New York: New York Academy of Medicine, 1991;15-26.
11. van Dijk FJH, Souman AM, de V'ries FF. Nonauditory effects of noise in industry. VI. A final field study in industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1987;59:133-45.
12. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational Noise Exposure; Hearing Conservation Amendment. Federal Register, 46(11). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1981. (OSHA Publication No. 29 CFR 1910.)
13. Department of Health and Human Services. Proposed National Strategies for the Prevention of Leading Work-related Diseases and Injuries: Noise-induced Hearing Loss, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1988. (Publication No. 89-135.)
14. United States Department of Labor, Occupational Health and Safety Administration. Construction Industry Digest. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995.
15. Lusk SL, Kerr MJ, Kauffman SA. Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure among construction workers. AIHA Journal 1998;59:466-70.
16. Abel SM, Alberti PW, Haythornwaite C, et al. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;71:708-15.
17. Berger EH. The effects of hearing protectors on auditory communications. Occup Health Nurs 1980;28:6-7.
18. Sataloff R, Sataloff RT. Documenting hearing conservation test equipment's effectiveness. Occup Health Safety 1986;55:28-9, 32-3, 35-6.
19. United States Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States. 115th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995.
20. Pender NJ. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 2nd ed. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange, 1987.
21. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Kerr MJ, et al. Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection. Nurs Res 1994;43:151-7.
22. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1979.
23. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGrawHill, 1978.
24. Smith MS, Wallston KA, Smith CA. The development and validation of the Perceived Health Competence Scale. Health Edtic Resource 1995;10:51-64.
25. Lusk SL, Kerr MJ, Baer LM. Psychometric testing of the reduced Laffrey Health Conception Scale. Am J Health Promot 1995;9: 220-5.
26. Laffrey SC. Development of a health conception scale. Res Nurs Health 1986;9:107-13.
27. Lawton MP, Moss M, Fulcomer M, et al. A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument. J Gerontol 1982;37:91-9.
28. Murdaugh C, Hinshaw AS. Theoretical model testing to identify personality variables effecting preventive behaviors. Nurs Res 1986;35: 19-23.
29. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Baer LM. A comparison of multiple indicators: observations, supervisor report, and self-report as measures of workers' hearing protection use. Eval Health Professions 1995;18:51-63.
30. Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
31. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1986:390-453.
32. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
33. Lusk SL. Test of Interventions to Prevent Workers' Hearing Loss. Grant proposal funded by National Institutes of Health and the National Institute for Nursing Research, 1997. (Grant No. 2R01 NR02050-04.)
34. Kerr MJ. Intervention to Prevent Construction Worker Hearing Loss. Grant proposal funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1997. (Grant No. R01 CCR513049-04.)
35. Else D. A note on the protection afforded by hearing protectors - implications of the energy principle. Ann Occup Hyg 1973;16:81-3.
36. Dear TA. Updating damage risk criteria to include performance under workplace noise regulations. J Occup Hearing Loss 1998; 1:61-6.