Filters on computer displays - Effects on legibility, performance and comfort

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 427-433

  Sheedy, James E ^a   Subbaram, Manoj V ^a   Hayes, John R ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABERRATIONS; CATHODE RAY TUBES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LIGHT REFLECTION; LIGHTING; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS; OPTICAL FILTERS; PLASTICS; STATISTICS; SUBJECTIVE TESTING; VISIBILITY; VISION;

BRIGHTNESS; CONTRAST; CONTRAST-ENHANCING FILTERS (CEF); LUMINANCE;

COMPUTER MONITORS;

EID: 0344121333     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290310001615446     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. ÇAKIR, A., REUTER, H.-J. and SCHMUDE, L. v. u.a. 1977, Anpassung von Bildschirmarbeitsplätzen an die physische und psychische Funktionsweise des Menschen (TU, Berlin).
2. ÇAKIR, A., HART, D. J. and STEWART, T. F. M. 1979, The VDT manual (IFRA, Darmstadt).
3. HEATH, G. G. 1956, The influence of visual acuity on accommodative responses of the eye. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of the American Academy of Optometry, 33(10), 513-524.
4. HLADKY, A. and PROCHAZKA, B. 1998, Using a screen filter positively influences the physical well-being of VDU operators. Central European Journal of Public Health, 6(3), 249-259.
5. LEGGE, G. E., RUBIN, G. S. and LUEBKER, A. 1987, Psychophysics of Reading-V. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Research, 27(7), 1165-1177.
6. LUCKIESH, M. and Moss, F. K. 1938, Visibility and readability of print on white and tinted papers. Sight Saving Review, 8, 123-134.
7. PATERSON, D.G. and TINKER, M.A. 1931, Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: VI black type versus white type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(2), 241-247.
8. POYNTER, D. 1992, Contrast sensitivity and image resolution: applications to the design of visual displays. Displays, 13(1), 35-43.
9. ROUFS, A. J., BOSCHMAN, M. C. and LEERMAKERS, M. A. M. (1988), Visual Comfort as a Criterion for Designing Display Units. In: Van der Veer G.C., Mulder G. (Eds.). Human Computer Interaction: Psychonomic Aspects. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
10. ROUFS, A. J. and BOSCHMAN, M. C. (1991), Visual comfort and performance. In Roufs J.A. (Ed.). Vision and Visual Dysfunction, Band 15, The Man-Machine Interface. Macmillan Press, Houndmills.
11. SCULLICA, L., RECHICHI, C. and DE MOJA, C. A. 1995, Protective filters in the prevention of asthenopia at a video display terminal. Perceptual Motor Skills, 80, 299-303.
12. SHEEDY, J. E., BAILEY, I. L. and RAASCH, T. W. 1984, Visual acuity and chart luminance. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 61(9), 595-600.
13. SHEEDY, J. E. and BAILEY, I .L. 1994, Using visual acuity to measure display legibility. Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Volume XXV, Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, CA.
14. VAN NES, F. L. and JACOBS, J. C. 1981, The effects of contrast on letter and word recognition. IPO Annual Progess Report, 16, 72-80.
15. WACKER, R. T., BAILEY, I .L. and TUAN, K. 1999, Visual performance on CRTs with anti-reflection coatings. Optometry and Vision Science, 76(12s), 268.