Biophysical modelling of catchment-scale surface water and groundwater response to land-use change

Mathematics and Computers in Simulation

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-12

  Dawes, W R ^a   Gilfedder, M ^a   Walker, G R ^a   Evans, W R ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b Salient Solutions P/L   (Australia)

Author keywords

Catchment salt load; Groundwater flow system; Groundwater response; Land use change

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; FUNCTIONS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURFACE WATERS;

GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEMS;

CATCHMENTS;

EID: 0344120790     PISSN: 03784754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4754(03)00116-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Gilfedder M., Walker G. Review of Dryland salinity risk assessment methods. Nat. Resour. Manage. 4(1):2001;1-9.
2. R. Salama, T.J. Hatton, G.M. Elder, L. Ye, Hydro-geological characterisation of catchments using HARSD, in: M. Tanaguchi (Ed.), Subsurface Hydrological Response to Land Cover and Land Use Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwood, MA, 1997, pp. 153-166.
3. Salama R., Hatton T.J., Dawes W. Predicting land use impacts on regional scale groundwater recharge and discharge. J. Environ. Qual. 28:1999;446-460.
4. Projections of the Ultimate Salt Load from Victorian Dryland Catchments to the Murray River, Sinclair Knight Merz, Armadale, 1999.
5. J.E. Coram, P.R. Dyson, P.A. Houlder, W.R. Evans, Australian Groundwater Flow Systems contributing to Dryland Salinity, Bureau of Rural Sciences for the National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra, 2000.
6. Zhang L., Dawes W.R., Walker G.R. The response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 37:2001;701-708.
7. Petheram C., Walker G., Grayson R., Thierfelder T., Zhang L. Towards a framework for predicting impacts of land-use on recharge. 1. A review of recharge studies in Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 40:2002;397-417.
8. Priestley C.H.B., Taylor R.J. On the assessment of the surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Weather Rev. 100:1972;81-92.
9. R.A. Vertessy, Y. Bessard, Anticipating the negative hydrologic effects of plantation expansion, in: J. Croke, P. Lane (Eds.), Forest Management for Water Quality and Quantity, Report 99/6, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Canberra, 1999, pp. 69-74.
10. Sherman L.K. Stream flow from unit-graph method. Water Resour. Bull. 12:1932;381-392.
11. Moussa R. Geomorphological transfer function calculated from digital elevation models for distributed hydrological modelling. Hydrol. Processes. 11:1997;429-449.
12. Yu C., Warrick A.W., Conklin M.H. A moment method for analyzing breakthrough curves of step input. Water Resour. Res. 35:1999;3567-3572.
13. Wittenburg H. Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes. Hydrol. Processes. 13:1999;715-726.
14. Luther K.H., Haitjema H.M. Numerical experiments on the residence time distributions of heterogeneous ground-watersheds. J. Hydrol. 207:1998;1-17.
15. M.C. McDonald, A.W. Harbaugh, MODFLOW, A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite Difference Ground-Water Flow Model, Open-file report 83-875, US Geological Survey, Washington, 1988 (Chapter A1).
16. I.D. Jolly, T.I. Dowling, L. Zhang, D.R. Williamson, G.R. Walker, Water and Salt Balances of the Catchments of the Murray-Darling Basin, Technical Report 37/97, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, 1997.
17. R. Bell, A. Heaney, A Basin Scale Model for Assessing Salinity Management Options: Model Documentation, Technical Working Paper 2000.1, ABARE, Canberra, 2000.
18. M. Gilfedder, C. Smitt, W.R. Dawes, C. Petheram, M. Stauffacher, G.R. Walker, Impact of Increased Recharge on Groundwater Discharge: Development of a Simplified Function Using Catchment Parameters, CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report 19/03, CRC for Catchment Hydrology Technical Report 03/6, MDBC Publication 05/03, Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, 2003.