Assessing the relative quality of anesthesiology and critical care medicine Internet mailing lists

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 520-525

  Hernández Borges, Angel A ^a,c   Macías Cervi, Pablo ^a   Gaspar Guardado, M Asunción ^a   Torres Álvarez De Arcaya, M Luisa ^b   Ruiz Rabaza, Ana ^b   Ormazábal Ramos, Carlos ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO NUESTRA SEÑORA DE CANDELARIA   (Spain)

^c NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTICLE; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; BIBLIOMETRICS; CRITICAL CARE; INTERNET; PUBLISHING;

EID: 0344117717     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00051     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Shapira Y, Talmor D, Artru AA, Lam AM. Resident education and unreviewed material. Anesth Analg 1996;83:886-91.
2. Lief PD. The Internet and the Journal [letter]. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1077.
3. Sonnenberg FA. Health information on the Internet: opportunities and pitfalls. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:151-2.
4. Wiviott LD. The Internet and the Journal [letter]. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1078.
5. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ [serial online] 1997;314:1875-9. Available at: http:// www.bmj.com/archive/7098ip1.htm. Accessed November 17, 1998.
6. Hernández-Borges AA, Pareras LG, Jiménez A. Comparative analysis of pediatric mailing lists on the Internet. Pediatrics [serial online] 1997;100:E8. Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/ content/full/100/2/e8. Accessed November 17, 1998.
7. Eisenach JC. Web site reviews: a new feature. Anesthesiology 1997;86:510.
8. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor - let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997;277:1244-5.
9. Kuppersmith RB, Holsinger C, Jenkins HA. The use of e-mail by otolaryngologists. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122: 921-2.
10. Meachan RB, Niederberger CS. Use of a moderated international Internet information exchange in the study of male reproduction. Urology 1996;48:3-6.
11. Tarczy-Hornoch P. NICU-Net: an electronic forum for neonatology. Pediatrics 1996;97:398-9.
12. Pallen M. Electronic mail. BMJ 1995;311:1487-90.
13. Ruskin KJ, Tissot M. A new method of communication between anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 1993;79:867.
14. Ruskin KJ, Kofke A, Turndorf H. The anesthesiology discussion group: development of a method of communication between anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1995;81:163-6.
15. Elliott SJ, Elliott RG. Internet listservers and pediatrics: newly emerging legal and clinical practice issues. Pediatrics 1996;97: 399-400.
16. Pareras LG, ed. Internet y medicina. Barcelona: Masson S.A., 1996.
17. De Ville KA. Internet listservers and pediatrics: newly emerging legal and clinical practice issues II. Pediatrics 1996;98:453-4.
18. Scientific Papers. 1996 annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 1996;85:A1-1344.
19. Abstracts to the 70th Clinical and Scientific Congress of the International Anesthesia Research Society. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:31-567.
20. Abstracts to the European Society of Anaesthesiologists Annual Congress. Br J Anaesth 1996;76:A1-418.
21. Abstracts to the 26th Educational and Scientific Symposium of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 1997;25: A1-153.
22. Hansson S. Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals [letter]. Lancet 1995;346:906.
23. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972;178:471-9.
24. Garfield E. How can impact factors be improved? BMJ 1996;313: 411-3.
25. LaPorte RE, Marler E, Akazawa S, et al. The death of the biomedical journals. BMJ 1995;310:1387-90.
26. International Committee of Medical Journals Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA 1997;277:927-34.