Content analysis in negotiation research: A review and guide

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 458-467

  Harris, Karen L ^a  

^a WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344107369     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200525     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ALEXANDER, J. J., SCHUL, P. L., & BABAKUS, E. (1991). Analyzing interpersonal communications in industrial marketing negotiations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 129-139.
2. ANGELMAR, R., & STERN, L. W. (1978). Development of a content analytic system for analysis of bargaining communication in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 93-102.
3. BALES, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.
4. BAXTER, L. (1991). Content analysis. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 239-254). New York: Guilford.
5. BAZERMAN, M. H., & NEALE, M. A. (1983). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to effective dispute resolution. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 51-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6. BEN-YOAV, O., & PRUITT, D. G. (1984). Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 34, 283-295.
7. BERIKER, N., & DRUCKMAN, D. (1996). Simulating the Lausanne peace negotiations, 1922-23: Power asymmetries in bargaining. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. BONOMA, T. V., & ROSENBERG, H. (1975). Theory-based content analysis: A social influence perspective for evaluating group process. Chicago: Institute for Juvenile Research.
9. CARTWRIGHT, D. P. (1953). Analysis of qualitative material. In L. Festinger & D. Katz (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences (pp. 421-470). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. COHEN, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
11. DONOHUE, W. A. (1981). Development of a model of rule use in negotiation interaction. Communication Monographs, 48, 106-120.
12. DONOHUE, W. A., DIEZ, M. E., & HAMILTON, M. (1984). Coding naturalistic negotiation interaction. Human Communication Research, 10, 403-425.
13. DRUCKMAN, D. (1991). Content analysis. In V. A. Kremenyuk (Ed.), International negotiation (pp. 244-263). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. DRUCKMAN, D., & HARRIS, R. (1990). Alternative models of responsiveness in international negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34, 234-251.
15. DUCK, S., & MONTGOMERY, B. M. (1991). The interdependence among interaction substance, theory, and methods. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 3-15). New York: Guilford.
16. FOLGER, J. P., HEWES, D. E., & POOLE, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 115-161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. GALINAT, W. H., & MULLER, G. F. (1988). Verbal responses to different bargaining strategies: A content analysis of real-life buyer-seller interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 160-178.
18. GRACE, H. A., & TANDY, M. J. (1957). Delegate communication as an index of group tension. Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 93-97.
19. HOLSTI, O. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 596-692). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. HOPMANN, P. T. (1972). Internal and external influences on bargaining in arms control negotiations: The partial test-ban. In B. M. Russett (Ed.), Peace, war, and numbers (pp. 213-237). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. HOPMANN, P. T., & KING, T. (1976). Interactions and perceptions in the test ban negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 20, 105-142.
22. HOPMANN, P. T., & WALCOTT, C. (1976). The impact of international conflict and detente on bargaining in arms control negotiations: An experimental analysis. International Interactions, 2, 189-206.
23. JONES, T. S. (1988). Phase structures in agreement and no-agreement mediation. Communication Research, 15, 470-495.
24. KIMMEL, M. J., PRUITT, D. G., MAGENAU, J. M., KONAR-GOLDBAND, E., & CARNEVALE, P. J. (1980). Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 38, 9-22.
25. LEWIS, S. A., & FRY, W. R. (1977). Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 20, 75-92.
26. LONGABAUGH, R. (1963). A category system for coding interpersonal behavior as social exchange. Sociometry, 26, 319-344.
27. MCGILLICUDDY, N. B., WELTON, G. L., & PRUITT, D. G. (1987). Third-party intervention: A field experiment comparing three different models. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 104-112.
28. MCGRATH, J. E., & JULIAN, J. W. (1963). Interaction process and task outcome in experimentally-created negotiation groups. Journal of Psychological Studies, 14, 117-138.
29. MORLEY, I., & STEPHENSON, G. (1977). The social psychology of bargaining. London: Allen & Unwin.
30. OSTERBERG, W. H. (1950). A method for the study of bargaining conferences. Personnel Psychology, 3, 169-178.
31. PARROTT, R., GREENE, K., & PARKER, R. (1992). Negotiating child health care routines during pediatrician-parent conversations. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 11, 35-45.
32. PRUITT, D. G., & LEWIS, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 31, 621-633.
33. PUTNAM, L. L., & JONES, T. S. (1982a). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 171-191.
34. PUTNAM, L. L., & JONES, T. S. (1982b). The role of communication in bargaining. Human Communication Research, 8, 262-280.
35. RACKHAM, N. (1972). Developing negotiation skills. Industrial & Commercial Training, 4, 266-275.
36. SACKETT, G. P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. D. Osofosky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 623-649). New York: Wiley.
37. SCHELLING, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. SCHULZ, J. W., & PRUITT, D. G. (1978). The effects of mutual concern on joint welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 480-492.
39. STILES, W. B. (1978). Verbal response modes and dimension of interpersonal roles: A method of discourse analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36, 693-703.
40. THOMPSON, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532.
41. THOMPSON, L., & HASTIE, R. (1990). Judgment tasks and biases in negotiations. In B. H. Sheppard, M. H. Bazerman, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Research in negotiation in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 31-54). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42. WALCOTT, C., & HOPMANN, P. T. (1978). Interaction analysis and bargaining behavior. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), The small group in political science: The last two decades of development (pp. 251-261). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
43. WALTON, R. E., & MCKERSIE, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. WEINGART, L. R., BENNETT, R. J., & BRETT, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.
45. WEINGART, L. R., HYDER, E. B., & PRIETULA, M. J. (in press). Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology.
46. WEINGART, L. R., THOMPSON, L. L., BAZERMAN, M. H., & CARROLL, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 7-31.
47. ZECHMEISTER, K., & DRUCKMAN, D. (1973). Determinants of resolving a conflict of interest. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 63-88.