Forest science and forest policy in the Americas: Building bridges to a sustainable future

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 329-337

  Guldin, Richard W ^a,b  

^a Intl Union of Forest Res Org   (Austria)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest policy; Science policy interface; Scientific community

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH; RISK MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT;

FORESTRY;

ARENA;

EID: 0344100128     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00042-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Aron, J.L., Patz, J.A., 2001. Ecosystem Change and Public Health. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 526.
2. Baskerville, G., 1997. Advocacy, science, policy, and life in the real world. Conservation Ecology [online] 1 (1), 9. Available from http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art9.
3. Bradshaw, G.A., Borchers, J.G., 2000. Uncertainty as information: narrowing the science-policy gap. Conservation Ecology [online] 4 (1), 7. Available from http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art7.
4. Clark, W., Dickson, N., 1999. The global environment assessment project: learning from efforts to link science and policy in an interdependent world. Acclimations 8, 6-7.
5. Colwell, R., 2003. Obstinate Issues, Sophisticated Solutions: Environmental Research and Education for a New Age. Education for a Sustainable and Secure Future, Third National Conference on Science, Policy and the Environment. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, DC.
6. Crow, M.M., 2000. Linking scientific research to societal outcomes. Proceedings of the AAAS Colloquium on Science and Technology Policy, 12 April 2000, Washington, DC, pp. 129-131.
7. Franklin, J., 1997. Commentary on Gordon Baskerville's perspective. Conservation Ecology [online] 1 (1), 10. Available from http://www.consecol.org/ vol1/iss1/art10.
8. Jung, W., 1999. Expert advice in global environmental decision making: How close should science and policy get? ENRP Discussion Paper E-990-14. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 33p.
9. Lemons, J., 1996. Scientific Uncertainty and Environmental Problem Solving. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA.
10. Peterson, G., Pope, S., DeLeo, G., Janssen, M., Malcolm, J., Parody, J., Hood, G., North, M., 1997. Ecology, ethics, and advocacy. Conservation Ecology [online] 1 (1), 17. Available from http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art17.
11. Shaw, C., Everest, F., Swanston, D., 2000. Working with knowledge at the science/policy interface: a unique example from developing the Tongass Land Management Plan. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27, 377-387.
12. Wiens, J., 1997. Scientific responsibility and responsible ecology. Conservation Ecology [online] 1 (1), 16. Available from http://www.consecol.org/ vol1/iss1/art16.