Knowledge-based models for predicting species occurrence in arable conditions

Ecography

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 626-640

  Petit, Sandrine ^a   Chamberlain, Dan ^b   Haysom, Karen ^c   Pywell, Richard ^a   Vickery, Juliet ^b   Warman, Liz ^a   Allen, David ^d   Firbank, Les ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b THE NUNNERY   (United Kingdom)

^c CABI   (United Kingdom)

^d ADAS BOXWORTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABLE LAND; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HABITAT SELECTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

AVES; HEMIPTERA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 0344100100     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03545.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aebischer, N. J. et al. 2000. Ecology and conservation of lowland farmland birds. - British Ornithologists Union, Tring.
2. Anon, 1992. Convention on biological diversity. - United Nations, New York.
3. Anon, 1999. Arable stewardship: information and how to apply. PB 3957A. - Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.
4. Bibby, C. J. et al. 2000. Bird census techniques, 2nd ed. -Academic Press.
5. Bignal, E. M. 1998. Using an ecological understanding of farmland to reconcile nature conservation requirements, EU agriculture policy and world trade agreements. - J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 949-954.
6. Birnie, R. V. et al. 2000. The potential distribution and impact of bracken in Upland Scotland: an assessment using a GIS-based niche model. - Ann. Bot. 85: 53-62.
7. Bock, W. and Salski, A. 1998. A fuzzy knowledge-based model of population dynamics of the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemusflavicollis) in a beech forest. - Ecol. Model. 108: 155-161.
8. Bonn, A. and Schroder, B. 2001. Habitat models and their transfer for single and multi-species groups: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. - Ecography 24: 483-496.
9. Boone, R. B. and Krohn, W. B. 1999. Modeling the occurrence of bird species: are the errors predictable. - Ecol. Appl. 9: 835-848.
10. Chamberlain, D. E. and Siriwardena, G. M. 2000. The effects of agricultural intensification on skylarks Alauda arvensis: evidence from monitoring studies in Great Britain. - Environ. Rev. 8: 95-113.
11. Chamberlain, D. E. et al. 1999. Effects of habitat type and management on the abundance of skylarks in the breeding season. - J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 856-870.
12. Cowley, M. J. et al. 2000. Habitat-based statistical models for predicting the spatial distribution of butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented landscape. - J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 60-72.
13. Curral, J. E. P. 1987. A transformation of the Domin scale. -Vegetatio 72: 81-87.
14. Daunicht, W. et al. 1996. A fuzzy knowledge-based model of annual production of skylarks. - Ecol. Model. 85: 67-73.
15. Duelli, P. 1997. Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. - Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 62: 81-91.
16. Eriksson, A. 1998. Regional distribution of Thymus serpyllum: management history and dispersal limitation. - Ecography 21: 35-43.
17. Fielding, A. H. and Haworth, P. F. 1995. Testing the generality of bird-habitat models. - Conserv. Biol. 9: 1466-1481.
18. Fielding, A. H. and Bell, J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. - Environ. Conserv. 24: 38-49.
19. Firbank, L. G. et al. 1998. Mapping the distribution of weeds in Great Britain in relation to national survey data and to soil type. - Weed Res. 38: 1-10.
20. Fitter, A. and Ford, H. 1993. The ecological flora database. -Bull. Brit. Ecol. Soc. 24: 7-14.
21. Fleiss, J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. - Wiley.
22. Fuller, R. M. et al. 2002. The UK Land Cover Map 2000: construction of a parcel-based vector map from satellite images. - Cartogr. J. 39: 15-25.
23. Gibbons, D. W., Reid, J. B. and Chapman, R. A. 1993. The new atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988-1991. - Poyser.
24. Greenslade, P. J. M. 1964. The distribution, dispersal and size of a population of Nebria brevicollis (F.), with comparative studies on three other Carabidae. - J. Anim. Ecol. 33: 311-333.
25. Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J. G. and Hunt, R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology. - Unwin, London.
26. Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. - Ecol. Model. 135: 147-186.
27. Hellawell, J. M. 1991. Development of a rationale for monitoring. - In: Goldsmith, F. B. (ed.), Monitoring for conservation and ecology. Chapman and Hall, pp. 1-14.
28. Henderson, I. G., Vickery, J. A. and Fuller, R. J. 2000. Summer bird abundance and distribution on set-aside fields on intensive arable farms in southern England. - Ecography 23: 50-59.
29. Kampichler, C., Barthel, J. and Wieland, R. 2000. Species density of foliage-dwelling spiders in field margins: a simple fuzzy rule-based model. - Ecol. Model. 129: 87-99.
30. Kienast, F., Wildi, O. and Brzeziecki, B. 1998. Potential impacts of climate change on species richness in mountain forests, an ecological risk assessment. - Biol. Conserv. 83: 291-305.
31. Krebs, J. R. 1971. Territory and breeding density in the great tit Parus major. - Ecology 52: 2-22.
32. Lawton, J. H. et al. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. -Nature 391: 72-76.
33. Leemans, R. 1999. Modelling for species and habitats: new opportunities for problem solving. - The Science of the Total Environment 240: 51-73.
34. Lindroth, C. H. 1974. Coleoptera: Carabidae. Handbooks for the identification of British insects. - R. Entomol. Soc., London.
35. Lindroth, C. H. 1992. Ground beetles (Carabidae) of Fennoscandia. A Zoogeographic study. Part I specific knowledge regarding the species. - Intercept, Andover, Hampshire.
36. Luff, M. L. 1987. Biology of polyphagous ground beetles in agriculture. - Agricult. Zool. Rev. 2: 237-277.
37. Luff, M. L. 1998. Provisional atlas of the ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Britain. - Biological Records Centre, Huntingdon.
38. Manel, S. et al. 1999. Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: an illustration with Himalayan river birds. - J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 734-747.
39. Manel, S., Williams, H. C. and Ormerod, S. J. 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. - J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 921-931.
40. McCracken, D. I. and Bignal, E. M. 1998. Applying the results of ecological studies to land-use policies and practices. - J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 961-967.
41. Morris, M. G. 1982. Some responses of Arthaldeus pascuellus (Hem. Cicadellidae) to change in an Arrhenatherum grassland. - Z. Angew. Entomol. 94: 351-358.
42. Noble, D., Bashford, R. I. and Baillie, S. R. 2000. The Breeding Bird Survey 1999. - BTO Res. Rep. 247, British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford.
43. Ossiannilsson, F. 1978. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part 1: Introduction, infraorder Fulgoromorpha. - Fauna Entomol. Scand. 7.
44. Ossiannilsson, F. 1981. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part 2: The families Cicadidae, Cercopidae, Membracidae and Cicadellidae (excl. Deltocephalinae). - Fauna Entomol. Scand. 7.
45. Ossiannilsson, F. 1983. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part 3: The family Cicadellidae:Deltocephalinae, Catalogue, Literature and Index. -Fauna Entomol. Scand. 7.
46. Penney, M. M. 1966. Studies on certain aspects of the ecology of Nebria brevicollis (F.) (Coleoptera, Carabidae). - J. Animal. Ecol. 35: 505-512.
47. Perring, F. H. and Walters, S. M. 1963. Atlas of the British flora. - Bot. Soc. of the British isles.
48. Potts, G. R. 1986. The partridge: pesticides, predation and conservation. - Collins.
49. Ribaut, H. 1936. Homopteres Auchenorhynques (I. Typhlocybidae). - Faune de France 31.
50. Ribaut, H. 1952. Homopteres Auchenorhynques. II. (Jassidae). - Faune de France 57.
51. Rushton, S. P., Hill, D. and Carter, S. P. 1994. The abundance of river corridor birds in relation to their habitats: a modelling approach. - J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 313-328.
52. Rushton, S. P. et al. 1996. Modelling the spatial dynamics of ground beetles (Carabidae) within landscapes. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33: 233-241.
53. Salski, A. 1992. Fuzzy knowledge-based models in ecological research. - Ecol. Model. 63: 103-112.
54. Sherratt, T. N. and Jepson, P. C. 1993. A metapopulation approach to modeling the long term impact of pesticides on invertebrates. - J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 696-705.
55. Siriwardena, G. M. et al. 1998. Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed Common Birds Census indices. - J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 24-43.
56. Sotherton, N. W. and Moreby, S. J. 1992. The importance of beneficial arthropods other than natural enemies in cereal fields. - Aspects Appl. Biol. 31: 11-18.
57. Southwood, T. R. E. and Leston, D. 1959. Land and water bugs of the British Isles. - XII Warne, London.
58. Stace, C. 1997. New flora of the British Isles, 2nd ed. -Cambridge Univ. Press.
59. Stork, N. E. (ed.) 1990. The role of ground beetles in ecological and environmental studies. - Intercept, Andover.
60. Swetnam, R. D. et al. 1998. Applying ecological models to altered landscapes, scenario-testing with GIS. - Landscape Urban Plann. 41: 3-18.
61. Thiele, H. U. 1977. Carabid beetles in their environment. -Springer.
62. Tucker, K. et al. 1997. Modelling bird distributions - a combined GIS and Bayesian rule-based approach. - Landscape Ecol. 12: 77-93.
63. Wagner, E. and Weber, H. H. 1964. Heteropteres Miridae. -Faune de France 67.
64. Wilson, J. D. et al. 1999. A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of graniverous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. - Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 75: 13-30.
65. Winder, L. et al. 2001. Modelling the spatio-temporal response of predators to transient prey patches in the field. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 568-576.