The influence of the membrane zeta potential on the critical flux for crossflow microfiltration of particle suspensions

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 156, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 153-158

  Huisman, Ingmar H ^a   Vellenga, Eert ^a   Trägårdh, Gun ^a   Trägårdh, Christian ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ceramic membranes; Critical flux; Microfiltration; Silica particles; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

CERAMIC PRODUCTS; DIFFUSION IN SOLIDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MICROFILTRATION; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PH EFFECTS; SHEAR STRESS; SILICA; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

CERAMIC MEMBRANES; CRITICAL FLUX; MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES; TORQUE-BALANCE MODEL; ZETA POTENTIAL;

MEMBRANES;

SILICON DIOXIDE;

CERAMIC MEMBRANE; CROSSFLOW MICROFILTRATION; PARTICLE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SUSPENSION;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CERAMICS; MICROFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SUSPENSION; THEORY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 0344076249     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00328-7     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rodemann K., Staude E. Electrokinetic characterization of porous membranes made from epoxidized polysulfone. J. Membr. Sci. 104:1995;147-155.
2. Le Berre O., Daufin G. Skimmilk crossflow microfiltration performance versus permeation flux to wall shear stress ratio. J. Membr. Sci. 117:1996;261-270.
3. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 100:1995;259-272.
4. Huisman I.H., Elzo D., Middelink E., Trägårdh C. Properties of the cake layer formed during crossflow microfiltration. Colloids Surfaces A. 138:1998;265-281.
5. Blake N.J., Cumming I.W., Streat M. Prediction of steady state crossflow filtration using a force balance model. J. Membr. Sci. 68:1992;205-216.
6. Stamatakis K., Tien C. A simple model of crossflow filtration based on particle adhesion. AIChE J. 39(8):1993;1292-1302.
7. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96:1994;1-58.
8. Davis R.H., Leighton D.T. Shear induced transport of a particle layer along a porous wall. Chem. Eng. Sci. 42(2):1987;275-281.
9. Romero C.A., Davis R.H. Experimental verification of the shear-induced hydrodynamic diffusion model of crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 62:1991;249-273.
10. Huisman I.H., Trägårdh G., Trägårdh C., Pihlajamäki A. Determining the zeta potential of ceramic microfiltration membranes using the electroviscous effect. J. Membr. Sci. 147:1998;187-194.
11. Huisman I.H., Johansson D., Trägårdh G., Trägårdh C. Design of a crossflow microfiltration unit for studies of flux and particle transport. Trans. IChemE. 75(Part A):1997;508-512.
12. Elzo D., Huisman I.H., Middelink E., Gekas V. Charge effects on inorganic membrane performance in a crossflow microfiltration process. Colloids Surfaces A. 138:1998;145-159.
13. Bowen W.R., Jenner F. Electroviscous effects in charged capillaries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 173:1995;388-395.