Multivariate assessment of cervical invasion of endometrial carcinoma: Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 97-102

  Miyagi, Yasunari ^a   Yamada, Shinako ^a   Miyagi, Yuji ^a   Yamamoto, Junko ^a   Kawanishi, Kunihiro ^a   Ikuhashi, Hiromi ^a   Kodama, Junichi ^a   Yoshinouchi, Mitsuo ^a   Kudo, Takafumi ^a   Joja, Ikuo ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endometrial cancer; Gynecology; Hysteroscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multivariate analysis; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344053423     PISSN: 13419625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02488880     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Announcements: FIGO stages - 1988 revision - corpus cancer staging. Gynecol Oncol 1989;35:125-127.
2. Ludwig H. Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynec Obstet 1995;49(suppl):S1-S7.
3. Sugimoto O. Diagnostic hysteroscopy. In: Coppleson M, eds Gynecologic oncology. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1992:341-356.
4. Chen SS, Rumancik WM, Spiegel G. Magnetic resonance imaging in stage I endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:274-277.
5. Murakami T, Kurachi H, Nakamura H, Tsuda K, Miyake A, Tomoda K, Hori S, Kozuka T. Cervical invasion of endometrial carcinoma - evaluation by parasagittal MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1995;36:248-253.
6. Taddei GL, Moncini D, Scarselli G, Tantini C, Bargelli G. Can hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrial carcinoma influence therapeutic treatment? Ann NY Acad Sci 1994;734:482-487.
7. Artner A, Bösze P, Gonda G. The value of ultrasound in preoperative assessment of the myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1994;54:147-151.
8. Obara M, Inoue H, Ohwada N, Mizunuma H, Ibuki Y. Preoperative evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer. JJpn Cancer Ther 1994;29:1669-1676.