The roach population in the hypertrophic bautzen reservoir: Structure, diet and impact on daphnia galeata

Limnologica

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 61-68

  Kahl, Uwe ^a   Dörner, Hendrik ^a   Radke, Robert J ^a   Wagner, Annekatrin ^a   Benndorf, Jürgen ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomanipulation; Daphnia galeata; Diet; Population structure; Roach

Indexed keywords

AGE STRUCTURE; DIET; DIETARY SHIFT; PLANKTIVORY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDATION;

BAUTZEN RESERVOIR; GERMANY; SAXONY;

CLADOCERA; DAPHNIA GALEATA; GYMNOCEPHALUS CERNUUS; RUTILUS RUTILUS;

EID: 0343773457     PISSN: 00759511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0075-9511(01)80050-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. BEAN, C. W. & WINFIELD, I. J. (1995): Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophtalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity. Ecol. of Freshw. Fish 4: 37-46.
2. BENNDORF, J. (1990): Conditions for effective biomanipulation; conclusions derived from whole-lake experiments in Europe. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 187-203.
3. _ (1995): Possibilities and limits for controlling eutrophication by biomanipulation. Internat. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 80: 519-534.
4. _ KOOP, J. H. E., SCHULTZ, H., WAGNER, A., DEPPE, T., HERBST, R., HÜLSMANN, S., KAMJUNKE, N. & VOIGT, H. (1998): Biomanipulation zur Sanierung eutrophierter Seen - Erweiterung der Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft. Forschung und Technologie; Schlußbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben FKZ 0339549; 65 pp.
5. BOHL, E. (1980): Diel pattern of pelagic distribution and feeding in planktivorous fish. Oecologia 44: 368-375.
6. BRABRAND, A. (1985): Food of roach (Rutilus rutilus) and ide (Leuciscus idus): significance of diet shift for interspecific competition in omnivorous fishes. Oecologia 66: 461-467.
7. _ FAAFENG, B. A. & NILSSEN, J. P. M. (1990): Relative importance of phosphorus supply to phytoplankton production: fish excretion versus external loading. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 364-372.
8. CHRISTENSEN, B. & PERSSON, L. (1993): Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 1-9.
9. DÖRNER, H., WAGNEK, A. & BENNDORF, J. (1999): Predation by piscivorous fish on age-0 fish: spatial and temporal variability in a biomanipulated lake (Bautzen Reservoir, Germany). Hydrobiologia 408/409: 39-46.
10. _ SCHULTZ, H., MEHNER, T. & BENNDORF, J. (2001): Interaction between prey availability and feeding behaviour of age-1 and age-2 perch (Perca fluviatilis) in a biomanipulated lake (Bautzen Reservoir, Germany). Limnologica 31: 11-16.
11. HAMBRIGHT, K. D., DRENNER, R. W., McComas, S. R. & HAIRSTONE, N. G. Jr. (1991): Gape-limited piscivores, planktivore size refuges, and the trophic cascade hypothesis. Arch. Hydrobiol. 121: 389-404.
12. HANSON, P. C., JOHNSON, T. B., SCHINDLER, D. E. & KITCHELL, J. F. (1997): Fish Bioenergetics 3.0 for Windows. University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, Report WISCU-T-97-001, Madison, WI.
13. HARTMANN, J. (1977a): Sukzession der Fischerträge in kulturbedingt eutrophierenden Seen. Fischwirt 27: 35-37.
14. _ (1977b): Fischereiliche Veränderungen in kulturbedingt eutrophierenden Seen. Schweizer Z. Hydrol. 39: 243-254.
15. HEWETT, S. H. (1989): Ecological applications of bioenergetics models. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 6: 113-120.
16. HOFER, R., KREWEDL, G. & KOCH, F. (1985): An energy budget for an omnivorous cyprinid: Rutilus rutilus (L.). Hydrobiologia 122: 53-59.
17. HORPPILA, J. (1994): The diet and growth of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in Lake Vesijärvi and possible changes in the course of biomanipulation. Hydrobiologia 294: 35-41.
18. _ & PELTONEN, H. (1997): A bioenergetic approach on food consumption of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in a eutrophic lake. Arch. Hydrobiol. 139: 207-222.
19. HÜLSMANN, S., MEHNER, T., WORISCHKA, S. & PLEWA, M. (1999): Is the difference in population dynamics of Daphnia galeata in littoral and pelagic areas of a long-term biomanipulated reservoir affected by age-0 fish predation? Hydrobiologia 408/409: 57-63.
20. JAMET, J. L., GRES, P., LAIR, N. & LASSERRE, G. (1990): Diel feeding cycle of roach (Rutilus rutilus, L.) in eutrophic Lake Aydat (Massif Central, France). Arch. Hydrobiol. 118: 371-382.
21. KITCHEL, J. F. STEWART, D. J. & WEININGER, D. (1977): Applications of a bioenergetics model to yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 34: 1922-1935.
22. KUBECKA, J. (1993): Succession of fish communities in reservoirs of Central and Eastern Europe. In: STRAŠKRABA, M., TUNDISI, J. G. & DUNCAN, A. (eds.), Comparative reservoir limnology and water quality management, pp. 153-168. Kluwer, Amsterdam.
23. MARMULLA, G. & RÖSCH, R. (1990): Maximum daily ration of juvenile fish fed on living natural zooplankton. J. Fish Biol. 36: 789-801.
24. MEHNER, T., SCHULTZ, H., BENNDORF, J., RITTER, P. & KNESCHKE, H. (1994): Gewässersanierung durch Nahrungskettensteuerung? Die Talsperre Bautzen (Deutschland). Österreichs Fischerei 47: 204-211.
25. _ SCHULTZ, H. & HERBST, R. (1995): Interaction of zooplankton dynamics and diet of 0+ perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in the top-down manipulated Bautzen reservoir (Saxony, Germany) during summer. Limnologica 25: 1-9.
26. _ PLEWA, M., HÜLSMANN, S. & VOIGT, H. (1997): Age-0 fish predation on daphnids - spatial and temporal variability in the top-down manipulated Bautzen Reservoir, Germany. Arch. Hydrobiol., Spec. Issues Advanc. Limnol. 49: 13-25.
27. _ HÜLSMANN, S., WORISCHKA, S., PLEWA, M. & BENNDORF, J. (1998a): Is the midsummer decline of Daphnia really induced by age-0 fish predation? Comparison of fish consumption and Daphnia mortality and life history parameters in a biomanipulated reservoir. J. Plankton Res. 20: 1797-1811.
28. _ MATTUKAT, F., BAUER, D., VOIGT, H. & BENNDORF, J. (1998b): Influence of diet shifts in underyearling fish on phosphorus recycling in a hypertrophic biomanipulated reservoir. Freshw. Biol. 40: 759-769.
29. MICHEL, P. & OBERDORFF, T. (1995): Feeding habits of fourteen European freshwater fish species. Cybium 19: 5-46.
30. PERSSON, L. (1983a): Food consumption and the significance of detritus and algae to intraspecific competition in roach Rutilus rutilus in a shallow eutrophic lake. Oikos 41: 118-125.
31. _ (1983b): Effects of intra- and interspecific competition on dynamic and size structure of a perch Perca fluviatilis and a roach Rutilus rutilus population. Oikos 41: 126-132.
32. _ & GREENBERG, L. A. (1990): Juvenile competitive bottlenecks: the perch (Perca flaviatilis) - roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71: 44-56.
33. RADKE, R. J. (1998): Strukturbildende Prozesse in Fischartengemeinschaften mesotropher Seen des norddeutschen Tieflandes. Dissertation, Universität Konstanz. 139 pp.
34. SCHULTZ, H. (1992): Bestandsgröße, Wachstum und Zooplanktonkonsum der Kleinen Maräne (Coregonus albula) und anderer Fischarten im Arendsee. Limnologica 22: 355-373.
35. _ (1996): Drastic decline of the proportion of males in the roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) population of Bautzen Reservoir (Saxony, Germany): Results of direct and indirect effects of biomanipulation. Limnologica 26: 153-164.
36. _ WIELAND, F. & BENNDORF, J. (1992): Raubfischbesatz zur Regulation des Fischbestandes in einer hypertrophen Talsperre. In: M. VON LUKOWITZ (Hrsg.), Die Bedeutung der fischereiwirtschaftlichen Bewirtschaftung für die aquatischen Lebensräume. Arbeiten des Deutschen Fischerei-Verbandes 55: 57-92.
37. TOWNSEND, C. R. & PERROW, M. R. (1989): Eutrophication may produce population cycles in roach. Rutilus rutilus (L.), by two contrasting mechanisms. J. Fish Biol. 34: 161-164.
38. _ WINFIELD, I. J., PEIRSON, G. & CRYER, M. (1986): The response of young roach (Rutilus rutilus) to seasonal changes in abundance of microcrustacean prey: a field demonstration of switching. Oikos 46: 372-378.
39. VAN DENSEN, W. L. T. & GRIMM, N. P. (1988): Possibilities for stock enhancement of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in order to increase predation on planktivores. Limnologica 19: 45-49.
40. WISSEL, B., FREIER, K., MÜLLER, B., KOOP, J. & BENNDORF, J. (2000): Moderate planktivorous fish biomass stabilizes biomanipulation by suppressing large invertebrate predators of Daphnia. Arch. Hydrobiol. 149: 177-192.
41. WYATT, R. J. (1988): The cause of extreme year class variation in a population of roach. Rutilus rutilus L., from a eutrophic lake in southern England. J. Fish. Biol. 32: 409-421.