The generalizability of brief ratings of psychosocial functioning

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 141-151

  Green, Rex S ^a   Jerrell, Jeanette M ^a  

^a Division of the Santa Clara County   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0343655828     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(94)90051-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Assessment of psychotherapy outcome from the viewpoint of expert observer
2. The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring the overall severity of psychiatric disturbance
3. Selecting a rating scale for evaluating services to the chronically mentally ill
4. Harnessing the reliability of outcome measures
5. On averaging judges' ratings to increase their correlation with an external criterion
6. Measuring Program Outcome: The Progress Evaluation Scales
7. Statewide mental health outcome evaluation: A perspective of two southern states
8. Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies
9. Influences on internal evaluation data dependability: Clinicians as a source of variance
10. Reliability of measurement and the power of statistical tests: Some new results
11. Social Adjustment Scale II (SAS)
12. Social adjustment in relation to measures of psychopathology and self-report in schizophrenic outpatients
13. Interrater reliability decline under covert assessment