Incorporating the AUDIT into a general population telephone survey: A methodological experiment

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 97-104

  Ivis, Frank J ^a   Adlaf, Edward M ^a,b   Rehm, Jürgen ^a,b,c,d  

^a CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

AUDIT; Epidemiology; Survey methods

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA ANALYSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TECHNIQUE; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0343619415     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-8716(00)80012-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adlaf E.M., Ivis F., Ialomiteanu A., Bondy S., Rehm J., Walsh G. The Ontario Drug Monitor, 1997: Technical Guide. 1998;Addiction Research Foundation.
2. Adlaf E.M., Ivis F., Paglia A., Ialomiteanu A. The Ontario Drug Monitor, 1998: Technical Guide. 1999;Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.
3. Allen J.P., Litten R.Z., Fertig J.B., Babor T. A review of the research on the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT). Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 21:1997;613-619.
4. Babor T.F., Fuente J.R.d.l., Saunders J., Grant M. AUDIT: The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in Primary Health Care. 1992;World Health Organization.
5. Barry K.L., Fleming M.F. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) and the SMAST-13: predictive validity in a rural primary care sample. Alcohol Alcohol. 28:1993;33-42.
6. Bohn M.J., Babor T.F., Kranzler H.R. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. J. Stud. Alcohol. 56:1995;423-432.
7. Bradburn N.M., Sudman S., et al. Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. 1979;Jossey - Bass, San Francisco.
8. Cherpitel C.J. Analysis of cut points for screening instruments for alcohol problems in the emergency room. J. Stud. Alcohol. 56:1995;695-700.
9. Claussen B., Aasland O.G. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in a routine health examination of long-term unemployed. Addiction. 88:1993;363-368.
10. Conigrave K.M., Hall W.D., Saunders J.B. The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. Addiction. 90:1995a;1349-1356.
11. Conigrave K.M., Saunders J.B., Reznik R.B. Predictive capacity of the AUDIT questionnaire for alcohol-related harm. Addiction. 90:1995b;1479-1485.
12. Goldberg D.P., Oldehinkel T., Ormel J. Why GHQ threshold varies from one place to another. Psychol. Med. 28:1998;915-921.
13. Fleming J. The epidemiology of alcohol use in Australian women: findings from a national survey of women's drinking. Addiction. 91:1996;1325-1334.
14. Fleming M.F., Barry K.L., MacDonald R. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in a college sample. Int. J. Addic. 26:1991;1173-1185.
15. Hays R.D., Hill L., Gillogly J.J., Lewis M.W., Bell R.M. Response times for the CAGE, Short-MAST, AUDIT, and JELLINEK Alcohol Scales. Beh. Res. Meth. Instr. Comp. 25:1993;304-307.
16. Hays R.D., Merz J.F., Nicholas R. Response burden, reliability, and validity of the CAGE, short MAST, and AUDIT alcohol screening measures. Beh. Res. Meth. Instr. Comp. 27:1995;277-280.
17. Holmila M. Heavy drinking women: drinking patterns and resources for controlled drinking. Addic. Res. 1:1993;119-130.
18. Holmila M. Intoxication and hazardous use of alcohol: results from the 1992 Finnish drinking habits study. Addiction. 90:1995;785-792.
19. Ivis F.J., Bondy S., Adlaf E.M. The effect of question structure on self-reports of heavy drinking:closed-ended versus open-ended questions. J. Stud. Alcohol. 58:1997;622-624.
20. Kessler R.C., McGonagle K.A., Zhao S., Nelson C.B., Hughes M., Eshleman S., Wittchen H.-U., Kendler K.S. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 51:1994;8-19.
21. Lavrakas P.J. Telephone Survey Methods. 1993;Sage, Newbury Park.
22. Little R.J.A., Rubin D.B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 1987;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
23. Luckie L.F., White R.E., Miller W.R., Icenogle M.V., Lasoski M.C. Prevalence estimates of alcohol problems in a veterans administration outpatient population: AUDIT versus MAST. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 51:1995;422-425.
24. Nunnally J. 2nd. Psychometric Theory. 1978;McGraw - Hill, New York.
25. Rehm J. Measuring quantity, frequency and volume of drinking. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 22:1998;4s-14s.
26. Rogers J.L., Howard K.I., Vessey J.T. Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psych. Bull. 113:1993;553-565.
27. Room R. Kozlowski L.T., Annis H.M., Cappell H.D., Glaser F.B., Goodstadt M.S., Israel Y., Kalant H., Sellers E.M., Vingilis E.R. Measuring alcohol consumption in the United States: methods and rationales. Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems. vol. 10:1990;39-80 Plenum, New York.
28. Schuman H., Presser S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. 1981;Academic Press, New York.
29. Skipsey K., Burleson J.A., Kranzler H.R. Utility of the AUDIT for the identification of hazardous or harmful drinking in drug-dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 45:1997;157-163.
30. Stockwell T., Single E. Plant M., Stockwell T., Single E. Standard Unit Labelling of Alcohol Containers. Alcohol: Minimising the Harm: What Works? 1997;281 Free Association Books, London.
31. Sudman S., Bradburn N.M. Asking Questions. 1982;Jossey - Bass, San Francisco.
32. Volk R.J., Steinbauer J.R., Cantor S.B., Charles E., Holzer I. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) as a screen for at-risk drinking in primary care patients of different racial/ethnic backgrounds. Addiction. 92:1997;197-206.