Dependence on host constituents controlling food acceptance by Manduca sexta larvae

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 209-215

  Del Campo C, Marta L ^a   Renwick, J Alan A ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service and Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Deterrents; Experience; Feeding behavior; Host specificity; Manduca sexta; Solanaccac; Stimulants

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DIET; HOST PREFERENCE; HOST SPECIFICITY; LARVA;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MANDUCA SEXTA; NICOTIANA TABACUM; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; SPHINGIDAE; TABACUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; TUBEROSUM; VIGNA SINENSIS;

EID: 0343603386     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00580.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bell, R. A., C. D. Owens, M. Shapiro & J. R. Tardif, 1979.Development of mass rearing technology. In: C. C. Doane & M. L. McManus (eds), The Gypsy Moth: Research Toward Integrated Pest Management. USDA-FS Technical Bulletin 1584, pp. 599-633.
2. Boer, G. de, 1992. Diet-induced food preference by Manduca sexta larvae: acceptable non-host plants elicit a stronger inductionthan host plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 63: 3-12.
3. Boer, G. de & F. E. Hanson, 1982. Chemical isolation of feeding stimulants and deterrents from tomato for the tobacco horn worm. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Insect-Plant Relationships, pp. 371-372.
4. Boer, G. de & F. E. Hanson, 1987. Differentiation of roles of chemosensory organs in food discrimination among hosts and non-host plants by larvae of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Physiological Entomology 12: 387-398.
5. Boodley, J. W. & R. Sheldrake, 1982. Cornell peat-lite mixes for commercial plant growing. Informative Bulletin. New York State Collage of Agriculture, Cooperative Extention Service, Ithaca, N.Y. 43: 1-8.
6. Dethier, V. G., 1982. Mechanism of host-plant recognition. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 31: 49-56.
7. Jermy, T., F. E. Hanson & V. G. Dethier, 1968. Induction of specificfood preference in lepidopterous larvae. EntomologiaExperimentalis et Applicata 47: 211-230.
8. Schoonhoven, L. M., 1967. Loss of hostplant specificity by Manducasexta after rearing on an artificial diet. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 10: 270-272.
9. Schoonhoven, L. M., 1969. Sensitivity changes in some insect chemoreceptors and their effect on food selection behaviour. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 72: 491-498.
10. Städler, E. & F. E. Hanson, 1978. Food discrimination and inductionof preference for artificial diets in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Physiological Entomology 3: 121-133.
11. Szentesi, A. & T. Jermy, 1990. The role of experience in host plant choice by phytophagous insects. In: E. A. Bernays, (ed), InsectPlant Interactions, Volume 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 34-74.
12. Thacker, J. D., J. Bordner & C. Bumgardner, 1990. Carolinoside: a phytosteroidal glycoside from Solanum carolinense. Phytochemistry 29: 2965-2970.
13. Wrubel, R. P. & E. A. Bernays, 1990. Effects of ingestion of some non-host plant secondary compounds on larvae of Manduca sexta. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 54: 125-130.
14. Yamamoto, R. T. 1974. Induction of hostplant specificity in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Journal of Insect Physiology 20: 641-650.
15. Yamamoto, R. T. & G. S. Fraenkel, 1960. The specificity of the tobacco hornworm, Protoparce sexta, to solanaceous plants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 53: 503-507.