Cleistogamous capitulum in Centaurea melitensis (Asteraceae): Heterochronic origin

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 87, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 925-933

  Porras, Rafael ^a   Muñoz, Jesus M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Allometry; Asteraceae; Centaurea; Cleistogamy; Heterochrony

Indexed keywords

CENTAUREA MELITENSIS;

EID: 0343603303     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2656991     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ALBERCH, P., S. J. GOULD, G. F. OSTER, AND D. B. WAKE. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296-317.
2. ARROYO, M. T. K. 1973. Chiasma frecuency evidence on the evolution of autogamy in Limnanthes floccosa (Limnanthaceae). Evolution 27: 679-688.
3. DARWIN, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Appleton, New York, New York, USA.
4. GALLARDO, R., E. DOMÍNGUEZ, AND J. M. MUŃOZ. 1993. The heterochronic origin of the cleistogamous flower in Astragalus cymbicarpos (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 814-823.
5. GOULD, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Botanical Review 41: 587-640.
6. _. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. GUERRANT, E. O. 1982. Neotenic evolution of Delphinium nudicaule (Ranunculaceae): a hummingbird-pollinated larkspur. Evolution 36: 699-712.
8. _. 1988. Heterochrony in plants: the intersection of evolution, ecology, and ontogeny. In M. L. McKinney [ed.], Heterochrony in evolution: a multidisciplinary approach, 110-130. Plenum, New York, New York, USA.
9. HARLAN, J. R. 1945. Cleistogamy and chasmogamy in Bromus carinatus Hook. & Arn. American Journal of Botany 32: 66-72.
10. HUXLEY, J. S. 1932. Problems of relative growth. Methuen, London, UK.
11. JOHANSEN, D. A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
12. JONES, C. S. 1992. Comparative ontogeny of a wild cucurbit and its derived cultivar. Evolution 46: 1827-1847.
13. _. 1993. Heterochrony and heteroblastic leaf development in two subspecies of Cucurbita argirosperma (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 778-795.
14. KAMPNY, C. M., T. A. DICKINSON, AND N. G. DENGLER. 1994. Quantitative floral development in Pseudolysimachion (Scrophulariaceae): intraspecific variation and comparison with Veronica and Veronicastrum. American Journal of Botany 81: 1343-1353.
15. KUHRY, B., AND L. F MARCUS. 1977. Bivariate linear models in biometry. Systematic Zoology 26: 201-209.
16. LANGER, R. H. M., AND D. WILSON. 1965. Environmental control of cleistogamy in prairie grass (Bramus unioloides H. B. K.). New Phytalogist 64: 80-85.
17. LLOYD, D. G. 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions from the Gray Herbarium 195: 3-134.
18. LORD, E. M. 1979. The development of cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers in Lamium amplexicaule L. (Labiatae): an example of heteroblastic inflorescence development. Botanical Gazette 140: 39-50.
19. _. 1980. An anatomical basis for the divergent floral forms in the cleistogamous species Lamium amplexicaule L. (Labiateae). American Journal of Botany 67: 1430-1441.
20. _. 1981. Cleistogamy: a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. Botanical Review 47: 421-449.
21. _. 1982. Floral morphogenesis in L. amplexicaule L. (Labiateae) with a model for the evolution of the cleistogamous flower. Botanical Gazette 143: 63-72.
22. _. 1984. Cleistogamy: a comparative study of intraspecific floral variation. In R. A. White and W. C. Dickison [eds.], Contemporary problems in plant anatomy, 451-494. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, USA.
23. _, K. J. ECKARD, AND W. CRONE. 1989. Development of the dimorphic anthers in Collomia grandiflora: evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of the cleistogamous anther. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2: 81-93.
24. _, AND J. P. HILL. 1987. Evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of plant form. In R. A. Raff and E. C. Raff [eds.], Development as an evolutionary process, 47-70. Alan R. Liss, New York, New York, USA.
25. MAYERS, A. M., AND E. M. LORD. 1983a. Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. I. A growth rate studio. American Journal of Botany 70: 1548-1555.
26. _, AND _. 1983b. Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorala. II. An organographic study. American Journal of Botany 70: 1556-1563.
27. MCKINNEY, M. L. 1988. Heterochrony in evolution: a multidisciplinary approach. Plenum, New York, New York, USA.
28. _, AND K. J. MCNAMARA. 1991. Heterochrony : the evolution of ontogeny. Plenum, New York, New York, USA.
29. MCLELLAN, T. 1993. The roles of heterochrony and heteroblasty in the diversification of leaf shapes in Begonia dregei (Begoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 796-804.
30. MINTER, T. C., AND E. M. LORD. 1983. A comparison of cleistogamous and chasmogamous floral development in Collomia grandiflora Dougl. ex Lind (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 1499-1508.
31. PORRAS, R. 1998. Biologia reproductiva y evolutiva en Centaurea melitensis L. (Asteraceae). Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad de Córdoba, Spain.
32. REILLY, S. M., E. O. WILLEY, AND D. J. MEINHARDT. 1997. An integrative approach to heterochrony: the distinction between interspecific and intraspecific phenomena. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 119-143.
33. SAS. 1988. SAS procedures guide, release 6.03 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
34. SCHEMSKE, D. W. 1978. Evolution of reproductive characteristics in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): the significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59: 596-613.
35. WILKEN, D. H. 1982. The balance between chasmogamy and cleistogamy in Collomia grandiflora (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 69: 1326-1333.
36. ZOPFI, H. J. 1995. Life history variation and intraspecific heterochrony in Rhinanthus glacialis (Scrophulariaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 198: 209-233.