Are countries liable for their forestry practices?

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 7-9

  Amilien, Caroline ^a  

^a Section 1882   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0343561387     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE (ALI). 1992. Third restatement of the foreign relations law of the United States. In International environmental law, basic instruments and references, eds. E. Brown Weiss, P.C. Szasz, and D.B. Magraw. Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers.
2. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECHR). 1982. Eckle Judgement. Judgement Series A, p. 30-31.
3. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ). 1949. Corfu Channel case (U.K. v. Albania). Judgment of April 9, 1949. ICJ report, p. 4-22.
4. INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION (ILC). 1994. Tenth report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law. A/AN.4/449. April 4, 1994.
5. KISS, A. 1991. La réparation pour atteinte à l'environnement. In Société française de droit de l'environnement, la responsabilité dans le système international. Paris: Colloque du Mans, Pedone.
6. SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES. 1993. Decision in Minors Oposa versus secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. International Legal Materials, 1994, p. 173.
7. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (UNCED). 1992. Non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. June 3-14, 1992. A/CONF.151/26 (vol. III). August 12, 1992.
8. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT (UNCHE). Declaration on the human environment. June 16, 1972. In UNEP, Environmental law, guidelines and principles.