Dispersion and symmetry of bound states in the Shastry-Sutherland model

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 18, 2000, Pages 3958-3961

  Knetter, Christian ^a   Bühler, Alexander ^a   Müller Hartmann, Erwin ^a   Uhrig, Götz S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; GROUND STATE; HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MAGNETIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEUTRON SCATTERING; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS; RAMAN SCATTERING;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MAGNETIZATION; QUANTUM ANTIFERROMAGNETS; SHASTRY-SUTHERLAND MODEL;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 0343526170     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3958     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 10, 1388 (1969); 10, 1399 (1969); C. K. Majumdar, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3, 911 (1969).
2. C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 10, 1388 (1969); 10, 1399 (1969); C. K. Majumdar, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3, 911 (1969).
3. C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.) 10, 1388 (1969); 10, 1399 (1969); C. K. Majumdar, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3, 911 (1969).
4. B. S. Shastry and B. Sutherland, Physica (Amsterdam) 108B, 1069 (1981).
5. P. M. van den Broek, Phys. Lett. 77A, 261 (1980).
6. B. S. Shastry and B. Sutherland. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 964 (1981).
7. E. Müller-Hartmann, R. R. P. Singh, C. Knetter, and G. S. Uhrig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1808 (2000).
8. H. Kageyama et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3168 (1999).
9. S. Miyahara and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3701 (1999).
10. C. Knetter and G. S. Uhrig, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 209 (2000).
11. F. Wegner, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 3, 77 (1994).
12. Zheng Weihong, C. J. Hamer, and J. Oitmaa, Phys. Rev. B 60, 6608 (1999).
13. C. Knetter, E. Müller-Hartmann, and G. S. Uhrig, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 12, 9069 (2000).
14. In the language of the unitary transformation a virtual process is given by a monomial T (m) [8].
15. S. Miyahara and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 61, 3417 (2000).
16. T. Momoi and K. Totsuka, Phys. Rev. B 61, 3231 (2000).
17. P. Lemmens et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2605 (2000).
18. Y. Fukumoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 2755 (2000); Eq. (10) is confirmed. But most of the 5th order terms in Table I deviate.
19. Explicit results will be available at www.thp.uni-koeln.de/~gu or www.thp.uni-koeln.de/∼ck.
20. Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, New York, 1989), Vol. 13.
21. H. Kageyama et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5876 (2000).
22. H. Nojiri et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 2907 (1999).
23. At small k any coupling is presumably too small to be noticed; at larger k the crossing no longer takes place [cf. energy of k = (0, π) in Fig. 4].
24. M. Albrecht and F. Mila, Europhys. Lett. 34, 145 (1996).
25. A. Koga and N. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4461 (2000).
26. T. Rōōm et al., Phys. Rev. B 61, 14342 (2000).
27. 4 singlet by higher order processes or from a singlet-triplet excitation.
28. S. Miyahara and K. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, Suppl. B, 72 (2000).