Large section technique in breast pathology an appropriate response to breast-conserving surgery;Les coupes larges en pathologie mammaire de routine une technique adaptee a la chirurgie conservatrice

Annales de Pathologie

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 275-279

  Mechine Neuville A ^a   Chenard, M P ^a   Gairard, B ^b   Mathelin, C ^b   Bellocq, J P ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

^b HÔPITAL CIVIL   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Local recurrence; Margins; Prognosis; Tissue processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARCINOMA IN SITU; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; RECURRENCE RISK; STAINING; TECHNIQUE; TISSUE SECTION; TUMOR VOLUME;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HISTOCYTOLOGICAL PREPARATION TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MICROTOMY;

EID: 0343517103     PISSN: 02426498     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. MACMILLAN RD, PURUSHOTHAM AD, MALLON E, LOVE JG, GEORGE WD. Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg 1997 ; 84 : 1559-62.
2. TAVASSOLI FA. Ductal carcinoma in situ : introduction of the concept of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 1998 ; 11 : 140-54.
3. CONNOLLY JL, BOYAGES J, NIXON AJ, PEIRO G, GAGE I, SILVER B et al. Predictors of breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer. Mod Pathol 1998; 11 : 134-9.
4. DIBIASE ST, KOMARNICKY LT, SCHWARTZ GF, XIE Y, MANSFIELD CM. The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 1998 ; 82 : 2212-20.
5. GRAHAM RA, HOMER MJ, SIGLER CJ, SAFAII H, SCHMID CH, MARCHANT DJ, SMITH TJ. The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR 1994 ; 762 : 33-6.
6. OWINGS DV, HANN L, SCHNITT SJ. How thoroughly should needle localization breast biopsies be sampled for microscopic examination ? A prospective mammographic/pathologic correlative study. Am J Surg Pathol 1990 ; 14 : 578-83.
7. DE MASCAREL I, TROJANI M, BONICHON F, COINDRE JM. Histological examination of 2859 breast biopsies : analysis of adequate sampling. Pathol Annu, part I 1993 : 1-13.
8. ZAFRANI B, CONTESSO G, EUSEBI V, HOLLAND R, MILLIS RR, PETERSE JL. Guidelines for the pathological management of mammographically detected breast lesions. Breast 1995 ; 4 : 52-6.
9. GIBBS NM. Large paraffin sections and chemical clearance of axillary tissues as a routine procedure in the pathological examination of the breast. Histopathology 1982 ; 6 : 647-60.
10. GAD A. Pathology in breast cancer screening : A 15 years experience from Swedish programme. In : GAD A, ROSSELLI DEL TURCO M. eds. Breast Cancer Screening in Europe. Springer-Verlag 1993 ; 87-101.
11. JACKSON PA, MERCHANT W, MCCORMICK CJ, COOK MG. A comparison of large block macrosectioning and conventional techniques in breast pathology. Virschows Arch 1994 ; 425 : 243-8.
12. GALLAGER HS, MARTIN JE. The study of mammary carcinoma by mammography and whole organ sectioning. Early observations. Cancer 1969 ; 23 : 855-73.
13. DE ROQUANCOURT A, ZAFRANI B, BOURSTYN E, ESPIE M, BROCHERIOU C. Étude macroscopique des pièces d'exérèse mammaire. Arch Anat Cytol Path 1994 ; 42 : 206-10.
14. ARMSTRONG JS, WEINZWIEG IP, DAVIES JD. Differential marking of excision planes in screened breast lesions by organically coloured gelatins. J Clin Pathol 1990 ; 43 : 604-7.