Nonperturbative and relativistic effects in projectile-electron loss in relativistic collisions with atomic targets

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 062701-062701

  Voitkiv, A B ^a   Muller C ^a   Grun N ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; LEAD; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

NONPERTURBATIVE EFFECTS; ULTRARELATIVISTIC COLLISIONS;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 0343490518     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062701     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A.B. Voitkiv, N. Grün, and W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052704 (2000).
2. A.B. Voitkiv, M. Gail, and N. Grün, J. Phys. B 33, 1299 (2000).
3. H.F. Krause, C.R. Vane, S. Datz, P. Grafström, H. Knudsen, S. Scheidenberger, and R.H. Schuch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1190 (1998).
4. N. Claytor, A. Belkacem, T. Dinneen, B. Feinberg, and H. Gould, Phys. Rev. A 55, R842 (1997).
5. H.F. Krause, C.R. Vane, S. Datz, P. Grafström, H. Knudsen, U. Mikkelsen, S. Scheidenberger, R.H. Schuch, and Z. Vilakazi, Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
6. G. Moliere, Naturforsch. 2A, 133 (1947).
7. F. Salvat, J.D. Martinez, R. Mayol, and J. Parellada, Phys. Rev. A 36, 467 (1987).
8. J.H. Hubbell, Wm.J. Veigele, E.A. Briggs, R.T. Brown, D.T. Cromer, and R.J. Howerton, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 4, 471 (1975).
9. J.H. Hubbell and I. Øverbø, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8, 69 (1979).
10. J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1975).
11. A.J. Baltz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1231 (1997).
12. R. Anholt, Phys. Rev. A 19, 1004 (1979).
13. 0〉, where F is a real function, preserve the unitarity.
14. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun (Dover, New York, 1965).
15. A.B. Voitkiv and A.V. Koval, Tech. Phys. 39, 335 (1994); J. Phys. B 31, 499 (1998).
16. A.B. Voitkiv and A.V. Koval, Tech. Phys. 39, 335 (1994); J. Phys. B 31, 499 (1998).
17. A.J. Baltz, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042701 (2000).
18. This set of results was given also in Ref. [1].
19. A.H. Sørensen, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2895 (1998).
20. R. Anholt and U. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4628 (1987).
21. U. Fano, Ann. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 13, 1 (1963).
22. Weick et al., GSI Report No. 2000-01, 2000.
23. 0 and the eikonal transition amplitudes (16) can be used for any impact parameter.
24. loss = 55.8-58.2 kb, which was calculated nonperturbatively in Ref. [16].
25. U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 102, 385 (1956).