The evolutionary development of biologic dressings and skin substitutes

Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 1 II SUPPL., 1997, Pages

  Pruitt Jr , Basil A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BURN; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; SKIN GRAFT; SUBSTITUTION THERAPY; TREATMENT PLANNING; WOUND DRESSING;

BIOLOGICAL DRESSINGS; BURNS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; HISTORY, ANCIENT; HISTORY, MEDIEVAL; HISTORY, MODERN 1601-; HUMANS; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 0343471993     PISSN: 02738481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pruitt BA Jr, Mason AD Jr. Epidemiological, demographic and outcome characteristics of burn injury. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995:5-15.
2. Herndon DN, Gore D, Cole M, Desai MH, Linares H, Abston S, et al. Determinants of mortality in pediatric patients with greater than 70% full-thickness total body surface area thermal injury treated by early total excision and grafting. J Trauma 1987;27:208-12.
3. Pruitt BA Jr, Silverstein P. Methods of resurfacing denuded skin areas. Transplant Proc 1971;3:1537-45.
4. Pruitt BA Jr, Sell K, O'Neill JA Jr, Lindberg RB, Moncrief JA. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried and fresh frozen homograft in burned patients. Annual Research Progress Report, US Army Surgical Research Unit, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Section 10, June 30, 1967.
5. Piccolo N, Piccolo-Lobo M, Piccolo-Daher M, Cardoso V, Silveira F. Use of frog skin as a temporary biological dressing [abstract]. Proc Am Burn Assoc 1992;24: abstract #39.
6. Sneve H. The treatment of burns and skin grafting. JAMA 1905;45:1-8.
7. Bromberg BE, Song JC, Mohn MP. The use of pig skin as a temporary biologic dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965;36:80-90.
8. Switzer WE, Moncrief JA, Mills W Jr, Order SE, Lindberg RB. The use of canine heterografts in the therapy of thermal injury. J Trauma 1966;6:391-5.
9. Pruitt BA Jr, Levine NS. Characteristics and uses of biologic dressings and skin substitutes. Arch Surg 1984;119:312-22.
10. Colocho G, Graham WP III, Greene AE, Matheson DW, Lynch D. Human amniotic membrane as a physiologic wound dressing. Arch Surg 1974;109:370-3.
11. Choy DSJ. Clinical trials of a new plastic dressing for burns and surgical wounds. Arch Surg 1954;68:33-43.
12. Chardack WM, Brueske DA, Santomauro AP, Fazekas G. Experimental studies on synthetic substitutes for skin and their use in the treatment of burns. Ann Surg 1962;155:127-39.
13. Levine NS, Salisbury RE, Mason AD Jr. The effect of early surgical excision and homografting on survival of burned rats and of interperitoneally-infected rats. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975;56:423-9.
14. Frank DH, Wachtel T, Frank HA, Sanders R. Comparison of Biobrane, porcine, and human allograft as biologic dressings for burn wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 1983;4:186-90.
15. Roberts LW, McManus WF, Shirani KZ, Mason AD Jr, Pruitt BA Jr. Evaluation of burn wound care in troops with burn injury: synthetic burn wound dressing - a comparative study. Annual Research Progress Report, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 88-102, Sept 30, 1985.
16. Burke JF, Yannas IV, Quinby WC, Bondoc CC, Jung WK. Successful use of a physiologically acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive burn injury. Ann Surg 1981;194: 413-28.
17. Heimbach D, Luterman A, Burke JF, Cram A, Herndon D, Hunt J, et al. Artificial dermis for major burns: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 1988;208:313-20.
18. Rue LW, Cioffi WG, McManus WF, Pruitt BA Jr. Wound closure and outcome in extensively burned patients treated with cultured autologous keratinocytes. J Trauma 1993;34: 662-7.
19. Woodley DT, Peterson HD, Herzog SR, Stricklin GP, Burgeson RE, Briggaman RA, et al. Burn wounds resurfaced by cultured epidermal autografts show abnormal reconstitution of anchoring fibrils. JAMA 1988;259:2566-71.
20. Meyer AA, Manktelow A, Johnson M, et al. Antibody response to xenogeneic proteins in burned patients receiving cultured keratinocyte grafts. J Trauma 1988;28:1054-9.
21. Compton CC, Hickerson W, Nadire K, et al. Acceleration of skin regeneration from cultured epithelial autografts by transplantation to homograft dermis. J Burn Care Rehabil 1993; 14:653 62.
22. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (Alloderm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 1995;21:243-8.
23. Rouabhia M, Germain L, Bergeron J, Auger FA. Allogeneic-syngeneic cultured epithelia. Transplantation 1995;59.1229-35.
24. Suzuki T, Ui K, Shioya N, Ihara S. Mixed cultures comprising syngeneic and allogeneic mouse keratinocytes as a graftable skin substitute. Transplantation 1995;59:1236-41.
25. Chu CS, McManus AT, Matylevich NP, et al. Enhanced survival of autoepidermal-allodermal composite grafts in allosensitized animals by use of silver-nylon dressings and direct current. J Trauma 1995;39:273-8.
26. Bell E, Ehrlich HP, Sher S, et al. Development and use of a living skin equivalent. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67:386-92.
27. Hansbrough JF, Boyce ST, Cooper ML, et al. Burn wound closure with cultured autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts attached to a collagen-glycosaminoglycin substrate. JAMA 1989;262:2125-30
28. Hansbrough JF, Morgan J, Greenleaf BS, et al. Development of a temporary living skin replacement composed of human neonatal fibroblasts cultured in Biobrane, a synthetic dressing material. Surgery 1994;115:633-44.
29. Hansbrough JF, Mozingo DW, Kealey GP, et al. Clinical trials of a biosynthetic temporary skin replacement. Dermagraft-Transitional Covering, compared to cryopreserved human cadaver skin for temporary coverage of excised burn wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996;18:43-51.