Using introspective learning to improve retrieval in CBR: A case study in air traffic control

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1266, Issue , 1997, Pages 291-302

  Bonzano, Andrea ^a   Cunningham, Pádraig ^a   Smyth, Barry ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; CONTROL TOWERS; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

CONFLICT RESOLUTION; CONTEXT SENSITIVE; FEATURE WEIGHT; INTROSPECTIVE LEARNING; LOCAL FEATURE; LOCALISED; PREDICTING OUTCOMES; SIMILAR CASE;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 0343408328     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63233-6_500     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Birnbaum, L., Collins, G" Brand, M., Freed, M., Krulwich, B., and Prior, L. (1991) A Model-Based Approach to the Construction of Adaptive Case-Based Planning Systems. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, pp. 215-224. Washington D.C., USA.
2. Bonzano A., & Cuningham P., (1996) ISAC: A CBR System for Decision support in Air Traffic Control in Proceedings of EWCBR '96, Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, Ian Smith & Boi Faltings eds. Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in AI, pp44-57.
3. th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 391-397.
4. Laird, J. E, Rosenbloom, P. S., and Newell, A. (1986) Chucking in Soar: The Anatomy of a General Learning Mechanism. Machine Learning. 1(1).
5. Laird, J. E., Newell, A., and Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987) Soar: An Architecture for General Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence. 33(1).
6. st International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 229-240, Springer-Verlag.
7. Munoz-Avila, H., Hüllen, J. (1996) Feature Weighting by ExplainingCase-Based Planning Episodes. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (Ed.s I. Smith & B. Faltings), Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 280-294, Springer-Verlag.
8. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 381-386. Lawrence-Erlbaum and Associates.
9. Saltzburg, S. L. (1991) A Nearest Hyperrectangle Learning Method. Machine Learning, 1.
10. Stefik, M. (1981) Planning and Meta-Planning. Artificial Intelligence, 16, pp. 141-170.
11. Smyth, B. & Keane, M. T. (1995) Remembering to Forget: A Competence Preserving Case Deletion Policy for CBR Systems. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), pp. 377-382. Montreal, Canada.
12. Veloso, M. (1992) Learning by Analogical Reasoning in General Problem Solving. Ph.D. Thesis, (CMU-CS-92-174), School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
13. Watson I. D., (1996) Case-Based Reasoning Tools: An Overview, In Proceedings of 2nd. UK CBR Workshop, Progress in Case-Based Reasoning, Watson. I.D. (Ed.) pp. 71-88. University of Salford, (also available on the Web at http://146.87.176.38/ai-cbr/Papers/cbrtools.doc)
14. Wetterschereck, D., & Aha, D. W. (1995) Weighting Features. Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (Ed.s M. Veloso & A. Aamodt), Proceedings of The 1st International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 347-358, Springer-Verlag.
15. Wettschereck, D., Aha, D. W., & Mohri, T. (1997). A review and empirical evaluation of feature weighting methods for a class of lazy learning algorithms. To appear in Artificial Intelligence Review, (also available on the Web from http://www.aic.nrl.navy.mil/~aha/)