Scenarios in user-centred design - setting the stage for reflection and action

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 61-75

  Bodker S ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; ITERATIVE METHODS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; USER INTERFACES;

ITERATIVE DESIGN PROCESS; USER CENTERED DESIGN;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0343391132     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00024-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bannon, L., 1996. From requirements as texts to requirements as constructions - emphasizing use, process and iteration in systems development, Workshop on Requirements Engineering in a Changing World-CAiSE 96 20-21 May, Crete.
2. Bardram, J., 1998. Scenario-based design of cooperative systems, Proceedings of COOP'98, Cannes, France.
3. Bødker S. Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in HCI. Nardi B. Context and Consciousness. Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction. 1996;147-174 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Bødker S., Christiansen E. Scenarios as springboards in design. Bowker G., Gasser L., Star S.L., Turner W. Social Science Research, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work. 1997;217-234 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
5. Bødker, S., Halskov Madsen, K., 1998. Context - an active choice in usability work, Interactions, July+August, pp. 17-25.
6. Bødker, S., Christiansen, E., Thüring, M., 1995. A conceptual toolbox for designing CSCW applications, COOP'95, International Workshop on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Juanles-Pins, January, pp. 266-284.
7. Bødker S., et al., 1993. Deliverable D 1.1: The EuroCODE Conceptual Framework: Preliminary, Empirica, Bonn.
8. Bødker S., Grønbæk J. Users and designers in mutual activity - an analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. Engeström Y., Middleton D. Cognition and Communication at Work. 1995;130-158 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Bødker S., Grønbæk K., Kyng M. Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. Schuler D., Namioka A. Participatory Design. Principles and Practices. 1993;157-176 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Bødker S. Through the Interface - a Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. 1991;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Bødker, S., 1995. Deliverable D 1.5.1: The EuroCODE Conceptual Framework: Framework Finalization - the Process, Aarhus University.
12. Bødker S. Understanding representation in design. Human-Computer Interaction. 13:(2):1998;107-125.
13. Buur, J., Bødker, S., 2000. Creative common grounds - reframing usability work, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, in preparation.
14. Carroll J.M., Kellogg W.A., Rosson M.B. The task-artifact cycle. Carroll J.M. Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. 1991;74-102 Cambridge University Press, New York.
15. Carroll J.M. Scenario-based Design. Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;Wiley, New York.
16. Crabtree, A., Mogensen, P., 2000. In preparation.
17. Floyd C. Outline of a paradigm change in software engineering. Bjerknes G., Ehn P., Kyng M. Computers and Democracy - a Scandinavian Challenge. 1987;191-212 Avebury, Aldershot, UK.
18. Gardner J. Strengthening the focus on users' working practices. CACM. 42:(5):1999;79-82.
19. Grønbæk K., Kyng M., Mogensen P. challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects. CACM. 36:(4):1993;67-77.
20. Grønbæk K., Kyng M., Mogensen P. Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach. Kyng M., Mathiassen L. Computers and Design in Context. 1997;201-238 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Greenbaum J., Kyng M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. 1991;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
22. Heath C., Luff P. Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Work (CSCW). 1:1993;69-94.
23. Hughes J., Randall D., Shapiro D. CSCW: discipline or paradigm? A sociological perspective. Bannon L., Robinson M., Schmidt K. ECSCW'91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 1991;309-323 Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam.
24. Jacobson I. The use-case construct in object oriented software engineering. Carroll J.M. Scenario-based Design. Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;309-336 Wiley, New York.
25. Kyng M. Creating Contexts for Design. Carroll J.M. Scenario-based Design. Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;85-108 Wiley, New York.
26. Madsen, K.H., 1996. Initiative in participatory design. In: Blomberg, J., Kensing, F., Dykstra-Erickson (Eds.), PDC'96, Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference; Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 223-230.
27. Marqvardsen, P., 1997. Erfaringer og anbefalinger vedrørende Kommunedatas brug af scenarier. BIDI report no. 8, Aarhus University.
28. Nielsen, C., 1998. Testing in the field, Proceedings of APCHI 98, IEEE Press, New York, pp. 285-290.
29. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2 ed. 1990;Sage, Newbury Park.
30. Rumbauch J., Blaha M., Premerlani W., Eddy F., Lorensen W. Object Oriented Modelling and Design. 1991;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
31. Suchman L., Trigg R. Understanding practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design. Greenbaum J., Kyng M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. 1991;65-90 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.