Large-scale application of some modern CSM methodologies by parallel computation

Advances in engineering software

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 501-509

  Danielson, K T ^a,b   Uras, R A ^c   Adley, M D ^b   Li, S ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION   (United States)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STRAIN;

COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURAL MECHANICS (CSM); MESHFREE METHODS;

PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0343279214     PISSN: 09659978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0965-9978(00)00033-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hoover CG, DeGroot AJ, Maltby JD, Procassini RJ. ParaDyn - DYNA3D for massively parallel computers. Engineering, Research, Development and Technology FY94, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL 53868-94, 1995.
2. Plimpton S, Attaway S, Hendrickson B, Swegle J, Vaughan C, Gardner D. Transient dynamics simulations: parallel algorithms for contact detection and smoothed particle hydrodynamics. In: Proceedings of SuperComputing 96, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
3. Danielson K.T., Namburu R.R. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis on parallel computers using FORTRAN 90 and MPI. Adv Engng Software. 29:(3-6):1998;179-186.
4. Danielson K.T., Adley M.D. A meshless treatment of three-dimensional penetrator targets for parallel computation. Comput Mech. 1999;. (in press).
5. Danielson K.T., Hao S., Liu W.K., Uras R.A., Li S. Parallel computation of meshless methods for explicit dynamic analysis. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 1999;. (in press).
6. Karypis G, Kumar V. A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. Technical Report TR 95-035, Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, 1995.
7. Bazant Z.P., Xiang Y., Prat P.C. Microplane model for concrete. I: stress-strain boundaries and finite strain. J Engng Mech. 122:(3):1996;245-254.
8. Bazant Z.P., Xiang Y., Adley M.D., Prat P.C., Akers S.A. Microplane model for concrete II: data delocation and verification. J Engng Mech. 122:(3):1996;255-262.
9. Bazant ZP, Caner FC, Adley MD, Akers SA. Incorporation of rate effects of fracturing and creep into microplane model for concrete dynamics. Submitted for publication.
10. Bazant ZP, Adley MD, Carol I, Jirasek M, Akers SA, Cargile JD, Rohani B, Caner FC. Large-strain generalization of microplane model for concrete. Submitted for publication.
11. Adley MD, Cargile JD, Akers SA, Rohani B. Numerical simulation of projectile penetration into concrete. In: Proceedings of the 14th US Army Symposium on Solid Mechanics, Myrtle Beach, SC, October 16-18, 1996. p. 189-96.
12. Akers SA, Windham JE. Structure medium interaction calculations of DIPOLE FAÇADE 8. In: Proceedings of the 14th US Army Symposium on Solid Mechanics, Myrtle Beach, SC, October 16-18, 1996. p. 481-8.
13. Ortega FA. GMV: General Mesh Viewer users Manual, Version 1.8. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LAUR 95-2986, 1995.
14. Bernard RS, Creighton DC. Projectile penetration in soil and rock: analysis for non-normal impact. Technical Report SL-79-15, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1979.
15. Forrestal M.J., Norwood F.R., Longcope D.B. Penetration into targets described by locked hydrostats and shear strength. J Appl Mech. 55:(4):1981;275-279.
16. Forrestal M.J., Altman B.S., Cargile J.D., Hanchak S.J. An empirical equation for penetration depth of ogive-nose projectiles into concrete targets. Int J Impact Engng. 15:(4):1994;395-405.
17. Adley MD, Danielson KT, Rohani B, Moxley RE. Coupling penetration resistance functions and finite elements for deformable projectile impact analysis. Submitted for publication.
18. Adley MD. PENCO2D/ABAQUS: a simply coupled penetration trajectory/structural dynamics model for deformable projectiles. Technical Report SL-92-26, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1991.
19. Warren TL, Tabbara MR. Spherical cavity-expansion forcing function in PRONTO 3D for applications to penetration problems. SAND97-1174, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1997.
20. Lucy L.B. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. The Astronomical Journal. 82:(12):1977;1013-1024.
21. Liu W.K., Jun S., Li S., Adee J., Belytschko T. Reproducing kernel particle methods for structural dynamics. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 38:1995;1655-1679.
22. Liu W.K., Chen Y., Uras R.A., Chang C.T. Generalized multiple scale reproducing kernel particle methods. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 139:1996;91-158.
23. Jun S., Liu W.K., Belytschko T. Explicit reproducing kernel particle methods for large deformation problems. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 41:1998;137-166.
24. Chen J.S., Pan C., Wu C.T., Liu W.K. Reproducing kernel particle methods for large deformation analysis of nonlinear structures. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 139:1996;195-228.
25. Günther F.C., Liu W.K. Implementation of boundary conditions for meshless methods. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 163:(1-4):1998;205-230.