An integrated framework for public sector environmental management in developing countries

Environmental Management

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 463-476

  Wang, Ming Shen ^a   Fang, J K ^a   Bowen, William M ^b  

^a NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental complexity; Integrated environmental management; Political complexity; Public institutions

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PUBLIC SECTOR;

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ENGINEERING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; ORGANIZATION; POLICY; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECYCLING; TAIWAN;

TAIWAN;

EID: 0343238886     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679910037     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson, B. F., D. H. Deane, K. R. Hammond, G. H. McClelland, and J. C. Shanteau. 1981. Concepts in judgement and decision making. Praeger, New York.
2. Bo, Y. C., and Y. L. Chien. 1998. The resource recycling system starts off again. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering 9(3):13-18 (in Chinese).
3. Born, S. M., and W. C. Sonzogni. 1995. Integrated environmental management: strengthening the conceptualization. Environmental Management 19(2):167-181.
4. Bowen, W. M. 1995. A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision. Socio-economic Planning Sciences 29 (2):151-164.
5. Bowonder, B. 1987. Management of environment in developing countries. The Environmentalist 7(2):111-122.
6. Chan, H. S., K. K. Wong, K. C. Cheung, and J. M. K. Lo. 1995. The implementation gap in environmental management in China: the case of Guangzhou, Zhengzhou, and Nanjing. Public Administration Review 55(4):333-340.
7. de Roo, G., and D. Miller. 1997. Transitions in Dutch environmental planning: new solutions for integrating spatial and environmental policies. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design 24:427-436.
8. Dietz, T., P. C. Stern, and R. W. Rycroft. 1989. Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: the case of environmental risk. Sociological Forum 1:47-70.
9. Edwards, W., and D. V. Winterfeldt. 1985. Public disputes about risky technologies: stakeholders and arenas. In V. T. Covello, J. L. Mumpower, P. J. M. Stallen, and V. R. R. Uppuluri (eds.), Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis. Springer-Verlag, NY, pp 134-149.
10. Gadlin, H., and E. W. Pino. 1997. Neutrality: a guide for the organizational ombudsperson. Negotiation Journal 13(1): 17-37.
11. Gibson, K., L. Thompson, and M. H. Bazerman. 1996. Shortcomings of neutrality in mediation: solutions based on rationality. Negotiation Journal 12(1):69-80.
12. Glasbergen, P. 1995. Environmental dispute resolution as a management issue. Pages 1-17 in P. Glasbergen (ed.), Managing environmental disputes: network management as an alternative. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
13. Gore, A. 1992. Earth in the balance: ecology and the human spirit. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
14. Hammond, K. R., and L. Adelman. 1986. Science, values and human judgment. Pages in H. R. Arkes and K. R. Hammond (eds.), Judgment and decision making under uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 127-143.
15. Hardin, G. 1963. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
16. Henning, D. H., and W. R. Mangun. 1989. Managing the environmental crisis: incorporating competing values in natural resource administration. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
17. Holmberg, J., and R. Sandbrook. 1992. Sustainable development: what is to be done? Pages 15-39 in J. Holmberg (ed.), Making development sustainable: redefining institutions, policy, and economics. Island Press, Washington, DC.
18. Hsueh, T. J. 1998. A discussion of the implementation of the construction plan for the No. 4 Nuclear Power Plant. Bimonthly Journal of the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission 22(2):57-62 (in Chinese).
19. Key, V. O. 1964. Public opinion and American democracy. Knopf, New York.
20. McNeil, R. J. 1987. A classification of causes of environmental problems and some policy implications. The Environmental Professional 9:138-143.
21. Meier, K. J., and K. B. Smith. 1994. Representative democracy and representative bureaucracy: examining the top-down and bottom-up linkages. Social Science Quarterly 75(4):790-803.
22. Miller, A. 1982. Tunnel vision in environmental management. The Environmentalist 2(3):223-231.
23. Renn, O., T. Webler, H. Rakel, P. Dienel, and B. Johnson. 1993. Citizen participation in decision making: a three-step procedure. Policy Sciences 26:189-214.
24. Selin, S., and D. Chavez. 1995. Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19(2):189-195.
25. Shen, Z. H. 1998. Setting the national four in one recycling system in action. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering 9(3):8-12 (in Chinese).
26. Soderbaum, P. 1987. Environmental management: a non-traditional approach. Journal of Economic Issues 21(1):139-165.
27. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124-1131.
28. Wang, M. S. 1992. Environmental decision and management: problems and methods. Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Fuwen Bookstore (in Chinese).
29. Warfield, J. N. 1989. Societal systems. Intersystems Publications, Salinas, CA.
30. Wilcock, D. 1995. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to nature conservation and countryside management in Northern Ireland. Area 27(3):252-260.
31. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future (The Bruntland report). Oxford University Press, Oxford.