Joint management of surface and ground water supplies

Ground Water

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 214-222

  Başaǧaoǧlu, Hakan ^a   Mariño, Miguel A ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; FUNCTIONS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PUBLIC POLICY; RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS); RESERVOIRS (WATER); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURFACE WATER RESOURCES; WATER WELLS;

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

WATER SUPPLY;

GROUNDWATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 0343178214     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00976.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Başaǧaoǧlu, H., and M.A. Mariño. 1996. Chance constraint model for joint management of stream-aquifer system. In UCOWR'96 Proceedings: Integrated Management of Surface and Ground-Water, 136-146. San Antonio, Texas: The Universities Council on Water Resources.
2. Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, and A. Meeraus. 1992. Release 2.25 GAMS (General Algebraic Modeling System) A User's Guide. Danvers, Massachusetts: Boyd & Fraser Publishing Co.
3. Gorelick, S.M. 1982. A model for managing sources of ground-water pollution. Water Resources Research 18, no. 4: 773-781.
4. Gorelick, S.M. 1983. A review of distributed parameter ground-water management modeling methods. Water Resources Research 19, no. 2: 305-319.
5. Illangasekare, T., and H.J. Morel-Seytoux. 1982. Stream-aquifer influence coefficients as tools for simulation and management. Water Resources Research 18, no. 1: 168-176.
6. Lall, U. 1995. Yield model for screening surface- and ground-water development. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 121, no. 1: 9-22.
7. Loganathan, G.V., and D. Bhattacharya. 1990. Goal-programming techniques for optimal reservoir operations. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 116, no. 6: 820-838.
8. Maddock, T., III. 1972. Algebraic technological function from a simulation model. Water Resources Research 8, no. 1: 129-134.
9. Maddock, T., III. 1974. The operation of a stream-aquifer system under stochastic demands. Water Resources Research 10, no. 1:1-10.
10. Maddock, T., III, and L.J. Lacher. 1991. Drawdown, velocity, storage, and capture functions for multi-aquifer systems. Water Resources Research 27, no. 11: 2885-2898.
11. Matsukawa, J., A.B. Finney, and R. Willis. 1992. Conjunctive use planning in Mad River Basin, California. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 118, no. 2: 115-131.
12. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1992. A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model. Washington, D.C.: Scientific Publications Co.
13. Spiegel, Z. 1962. Hydraulics of certain stream-connected aquifer systems. New Mexico State Engineer Office, Special Report, 105. Sante Fe, New Mexico: State Engineer Office.
14. Vasiliadis, H.V., and M. Karamouz. 1994. Demand-driven operation of reservoirs using uncertainty-based optimal operating policies. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 120, no. 1: 101-114.
15. Willis, R., B.A. Finney, and D. Zhang. 1989. Water resources management plan in North China plain. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 115, no. 5: 598-613.
16. Yeh, W-G.W. 1992. System analysis in ground-water planning and management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE 118, no. 3: 224-237.
17. Young, R.A., and J.D. Bredehoeft. 1972. Digital computer simulation for solving management problems of conjunctive ground-water and surface water systems. Water Resources Research 8, no. 3: 533-556.