Environmental performance for the olympics: Anticipating the response of the environment movement

Australian Planner

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 110-115

  James, Peggy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0343177322     PISSN: 07293682     EISSN: 21506841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.1997.9657758     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Altman, J, and Petkus, E, Jr. 1994. Toward a stakeholder-based policy process: an application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development. Policy Sciences, 27: 37–51.
2. Australian Manufacturing Council. 1992a. The environmental challenge: best practice environmental management Melbourne
3. Australian Manufacturing Council. 1992b. The environmental challenge: consultation and project development in the 1990s Melbourne
4. Department of Urban Affairs & Planning. 1995a. Performance based conditions of consent: best practice guidelines Sydney
5. Department of Urban Affairs & Planning. 1995b. “ Development application ”. In Procedures for Olympic Games and related projects Sydney
6. Department of Urban Affairs & Planning. 1996. Environmental planning for ESD: guidelines for compliance with the environmental guidelines for the Summer Olympic Games Sydney
7. Department of Urban Affairs & Planning. 1997. Integrated development assessment: white paper and exposure draft Bill Sydney
8. Deutscher, K. 1994. A practical perspective on better development approval practices Paper presented to the national seminar on quality of approval practices, Brisbane, 17 November
9. Fischer, F. 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases Policy Sciences 26:165-187
10. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity London: Hamish Hamilton Ltd.
11. Healey, P. 1993. “ Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory ”. In The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning Edited by: Fischer, F, and Forester, J. 233–253. Durham: Duke University Press.
12. Korporaal, G. 1996. “ Atlanta: city of corporate clutter ”. In Sydney Morning Herald 22 July
13. Jamison, A. 1996. “ The shaping of the global environmental agenda: the role of non-government organisations ”. In Rish, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology Edited by: Slash, Bszerszynski, and Wynne, B. 234–245. London: Sage Publications.
14. NSW Government. 1996a. Regulatory innovation: regulation for results discussion paper
15. NSW Government. 1996b. Towards an integrated land use planning and natural resource approvals policy for New South Wales, discussion paper
16. Olympic Co-ordination Authority. 1995. Homebush Bay development guidelines: environment strategy Homebush Bay
17. Olympic Co-ordination Authority. 1996a. Expression of interest for construction of infrastructure works at Homebush Bay Gutteridge, Haskins & Davey and the Olympic Co-ordination Authority, Sydney
18. Olympic Co-ordination Authority. 1996b. Environmental tender specification for Olympic Games projects and Homebush Bay development Sydney: Manidis Roberts Consultants and Olympic Co-ordination Authority.
19. Osborne, D, and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing government Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
20. Richmond, D. 1995. Letter to Chief Executive Officer of Plastics and Chemicals Industries Association, in PACIA, PVC and the Sydney Olympics: A selection of relevant documents.
21. Sturgess, G. 1994. Thirty different governments: the report of the Commission of Inquiry into Red Tape Sydney
22. Sydney Olympics. 2000. Environmental Guidelines for the Summer Olympic Games. Bid Ltd, 1993 Sydney
23. Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games. 1996. “ IOC ”. In Commission endorses Green Games Watch News Release. 3 February
24. Olympic Co-ordination Authority Act. 1995.
25. State Environmental Planning Policy No 38: Olympic Games Projects
26. 1993. Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games Act
27. Threatened Species Conservation Act. 1995.