Ethics and Health Technology Assessment

Monash Bioethics Review

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 15-24

  Ashcroft, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ethical Assessment; Health Technology Assessment; Informed Choice; Monash Bioethic Review; Social Impact Assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 0343172881     PISSN: 13212753     EISSN: 18366716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03351219     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Angell M “Editorial Responsibility: Protecting Human Rights by Restricting Publication of Unethical Research” in Annas GJ, Grodin MA (eds.) The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation Oxford: Oxford University Press
2. Ashcroft RE “The Genealogy of Scientific Ethics” unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge
3. R.E. Ashcroft D.W. Chadwick S.R.L. Clark R.H.T. Edwards L. Frith J.L. Hutton “Implications of Socio-cultural Contexts for Ethics of Clinical Trials” Health Technology Assessment 1997 1 9 1 65
4. Banta HD and Luce BR Health Care Technology and its Assessment: An International Perspective Oxford: Oxford University Press
5. Banta HD, Battista RN, Gelband H, Jonsson E “Health Care Technology and Its Assessment in Eight Countries” (US Congress Office of Technology Assessment Background Paper) US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC
6. nd edn.)
7. Berg M Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision Support Techniques and Medical Practices Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
8. Bijker WE, Hughes TP and Pinch TJ The Social Construction of Technological Systems Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
9. Bijker WE, Law J Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Socio-technical Change Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
10. Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, McKee M, Sanderson C, Askham J, Marteau T “Consensus development methods for creating clinical guidelines” in Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Reeves B (eds.) Health Services Research Methods: A Guide to Best Practice London: BMJ Books pp. 199–211
11. “The use of health-related quality of life measures in economic evaluation” in Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Reeves B (eds.) Health Services Research Methods: A Guide to Best Practice London: BMJ Books pp.23-34
12. Brody B The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective Oxford: Oxford University Press
13. I. Chalmers “Assembling comparison groups to assess the effects of health care” J R Soc Med 1997 90 379 386
14. Cochrane AL Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust
15. Daniels N Just Health Care Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. Edgar A, Salek S, Shickle D, Cohen D The Ethical QALY: Ethical Issues in Healthcare Resource Allocations Haslemere: Euromed Communications
17. SJL Edwards, RJ Lilford, S Kiauka “Different types of systematic review in health services research” in Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Reeves B (eds.) Health Services Research Methods: A Guide to Best Practice London: BMJ Books pp.255-259
18. Elster J, Hylland A (eds.) Foundations of Social Choice Theory Cambridge: Cambridge UP
19. Faulkner A “‘Strange bedfellows’ in the laboratory of the NHS? An analysis of the new science of health technology assessment in the United Kingdom” in Elston MA The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology Oxford: Blackwell pp. 183–207
20. “Research implementation methods” in Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Reeves B (eds.) Health Services Research Methods: A Guide to Best Practice London: BMJ Books pp.237-246
21. Habermas J Toward a Rational Society Cambridge: Polity Press
22. Hare RM Essays on Bioethics Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Hutton JL, Ashcroft RE “What does ‘systematic’ mean for reviews of methods?” in Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Reeves B (eds.) Health Services Research Methods: A Guide to Best Practice London: BMJ Books pp.249-254
24. Jennett B High Technology Medicine: Benefits and Burdens Oxford: Oxford University Press
25. Levi I The Enterprise of Knowledge Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
26. Levine RJ Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research Baltimore and Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg
27. Lockwood M, Anscombe GEM “Sins of Omission? The Ethics of Non-Treatment in Clinical Trials” Aristotelian Society supplementary vol. LVII: 207–227
28. rd November, 1998
29. MacKenzie D Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
30. Morton A Disasters and Dilemmas: Strategies for Real-Life Decision Making Oxford: Basil Blackwell
31. S. Perry E. Gardner M. Thamer “The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an international survey” Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997 13 81 98 10.1017/S0266462300010254
32. Rawls J A Theory of Justice Oxford: Oxford University Press
33. Scheffler S The Rejection of Consequentialism Oxford: Oxford University Press
34. R. Smith “Commentary: The importance of patients’ consent for publication” BMJ 1996 313 16 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.16
35. Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams K, Sheldon TA, Song F “Systematic Reviews of Randomised Controlled Trials” in Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Reeves B (eds.) Health Services Research Methods: A Guide to Best Practice London: BMJ Books pp. 175–186
36. H.A.M.J. Ten Have “Medical Technology Assessment and Ethics: Ambivalent Relations” Hastings Center Report 1995 25 13 19 10.2307/3562789
37. Wynne B Rationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain Chalfont St. Giles: The British Society for the History of Science.