A study of analysis parameters that influence the sensitivity of event- related fMRI analyses

NeuroImage

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 326-333

  Hopfinger, Joseph B ^a   Büchel, Christian ^b   Holmes, Andrew P ^c   Friston, Karl J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 0343133952     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0549     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adler R. The Geometry of Random Fields. 1981;Wiley, New York.
2. Aguirre G. K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. II. Spatially smoothed data collected under null-hypothesis and experimental conditions. Neuroimage. 5:1997;199-212.
3. Aguirre G. K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage. 8:1998;360-369.
4. Büchel C., Morris J., Dolan R. D., Friston K. J. Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron. 20:1998;947-957.
5. Friston K. J., Josephs O., Rees G., Turner R. Nonlinear event-related responses in fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 39:1998;41-52.
6. Friston, K. J, Josephs, O, Zarahn, E, Holmes, A. P, Rouquettes, S, and, Poline, J-B. To Filter or Not to Filter: Bias and Efficiency in fMRI Time Series Analysis, submitted.
7. Friston K. J., Ashburner J., Poline J-B., Frith C. D., Heather J. D., Frackowiak R. S. J. Spatial realignment and normalization of images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2:1995a;165-189.
8. Friston K. J., Holmes A. P., Poline J-B., Grasby P. J., Williams S. C. R., Frackowiak R. S. J. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage. 2:1995b;45-53.
9. Holmes, A. P, Josephs, O, Büchel, C, and, Friston, K. J. 1997, Statistical modeling of low-frequency confounds in fMRI. Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference of the Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. S480.
10. Josephs O., Turner R., Friston K. J. Event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5:1997;243-248.
11. Purdon P. L., Weisskoff R. M. Effect of temporal auto-correlation due to physiological noise and stimulus paradigm on voxel-level false-positive rates in fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6:1998;239-249.
12. Rajapakse J. C., Kruggel F., Maisog J. M., von Cramon D. Y. Modeling hemodynamic response for analysis of functional MRI time-series. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6:1998;283-300.
13. Skudlarski P., Constable R. T., Gore J. C. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: Individual subjects. Neuroimage. 9:1999;311-329.
14. Talairach, P, and, Tournoux, J. 1988, A Stereotactic Coplanar Atlas of the Human Brain, Stuttgart, Thieme.
15. Thacker N. A., Burton E., Lacey A. J., Jackson A. The effects of motion on parametric fMRI analysis techniques. Physiol. Meas. 20:1999;251-263.
16. 2, F and T fields. Adv. Appl. Prob. 26:1994;12-42.
17. Worsley K. J., Friston K. J. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited - Again. Neuroimage. 2:1995;173-181.
18. Zarahn E., Aguirre G. K., D'Esposito M. Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions. Neuroimage. 5:1997;179-197.