On the calculation of Gibbs energy corresponding to enantioselective interactions at a direct HRGC separation of enantiomers

Chirality

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 130-138

  Krupcík, Ján ^a   Spánik, Ivan ^a   Oswald, Peter ^a   Májek, Pavol ^a   Skacáni, Ivan ^a   Sandra, Pat ^b  

^a SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Calculation of enantioselective interaction energy; Chiral GC separations; Cyclodextrin selector; Enantiomers of 2 substituted n pentane derivatives

Indexed keywords

CYCLODEXTRIN; HALOGEN; PENTANE;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHIRALITY; DIASTEREOISOMER; ENANTIOMER; ENERGY; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; PENTANES; STEREOISOMERISM; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0343114391     PISSN: 08990042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-636X(2000)12:3<130::AID-CHIR5>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lindner W. Preface. Chiral separations. J Chromatogr A 1994;666:1-2.
2. Lipkowitz KB, Demeter DA, Zegarra R, Later R, Dardee T. A protocol for determining enantioselective binding of chiral analytes on chiral chromatographic surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 1988;110:3446-3452.
3. Armstrong DW, Ward TA, Armstrong RD, Beesley TE. Separation of drug stereoisomers by the formation of β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. Science 1986;232:1132-1135.
4. Kaliszan R, Noctor TA, Wainer IW. Quantitative structure-enantioseleclive retention relationship for the chromatography of 1,4-benzodiazaepines on a human serum albumin based HPLC chiral stationary phases: an approach to the computational prediction of retention and enantioselectivity. Chromatographia 1992;33:546-550.
5. Pirkle HH, Pochapsky TC. Chiral molecular recognition in small biomolecular systems: a spectroscopic investigation into the nature of diastereomeric complexes. J Am Chem Soc 1987;109:5975-5982.
6. Allenmark SG. Chromatographic separations: methods and applications. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; 1988. p 70.
7. Wainer IW, Noctor TAG, Domenici E, Jandand P, Ahuja S, editor. Chiral separations by liquid chromatography. Washington, D.C.: Am Chem Soc 1990. p 141.
8. Koenig WA. The practice of enantiomer separation by capillary gas chromatography. Heidelberg: Huethig; 1987.
9. Koenig WA. Gas chromatographic enantiomer separation with modified cyclodextrins. Heidelberg: Heuthig, 1992.
10. Koenig WA. Enantioselectivite gas chromatography. TRAC 1993;12: 130-137.
11. Schurig V, Nowotny HP. Gaschromatographische Enantiomertrennung an Cyklodextrinderivate. Angew Chemie 1990;102:969-986.
12. Ogston AG. Interpretation of experiments on metabolic processes, using isotopic tracer elements. Nature 1948;162:963-964, Ibid, 1951;167: 693-694.
13. Ogston AG. Interpretation of experiments on metabolic processes, using isotopic tracer elements. Nature 1948;162:963-964, Ibid, 1951;167: 693-694.
14. Dalgliesh CEJ. The optical resolution of aromatic amino acids on paper chromatograms. Chem Soc 1952:3940-3942.
15. Brown SE, Coates JH, Duckworth PA, Lincoln SF, Easton ChJ, May BL. Substituent effects and chiral discrimination on the complexation of benzoic, 4-methylbenzoic and (RS)-2-phenytlpropanoic acids and their conjugate bases by β-cyclodextrin and 6A-amino-6A-deoxy-β-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution: potentiometric titration. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1993;89:1035-1040.
16. Conder JR, Young CL. Physicochemical measurements by gas chromatography. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1979. p 146.
17. Krupčík J, Špánik I, Oswald P, Skačáni I, Onuska FI, Sandra P. Evaluation of enantioselective interactions in direct separation of enantiomers by gas chromatography HRC. 1998;21:197-200.
18. Yang WG, Roberts JD, Wax H. Allylic rearrangements. XVIII. Coupling reactions of butylmagnesium bromide. J Am Chem Soc 1945;67:841-843.
19. Morris JF, Taylor HB. J Am Chem Soc 1924;46:756.
20. Pines H, Rudin A. J Am Chem Soc 1952;74:4063.
21. Vaughn TH, Vogt RR, Nieuwland JA. J Am Chem Soc 1935;57:510.
22. Brown HC, Wheeler OH. J Am Chem Soc 1956;78:2199.
23. Stewart JJP. Optimization of parameters for semi-empirical methods. I. Method. J Comp Chem 1989;10:210-220.
24. van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC. Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: methodology, applications and perspectives in chemistry. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition in English 1990;29:992-1023.
25. Allinger NL. Conformational analysis. 130. MM2. A hydrocarbon force field utilizing V1 and V2 torsional terms. J Am Chem Soc 1977;99:8127-8134.