Regulation and Stumpage Prices a Tale of Two States

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 12-16

  Kittredge, David B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

STUMPAGE PRICES; TIMBER;

LOGGING (FORESTRY);

FORESTRY PRODUCTION; PRICE DYNAMICS; TIMBER MARKET;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0343114314     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ALEXANDER, L 1986. Nonindustrial private forest landowner relations to wildlife in New England. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
2. BARRETT, J.W. 1995. Regional lilricahurr of the United States. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. BIRCH, TAV. 1985. Forest landowners of southern NewEngland. USDA Forest Sen-ice Resource Bulletin (unpublished).
4. BOWMAN, I. 1911. Forest physiography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. BROOKS, R.T., D.B. KITTREDGE JR., and C.L ALERICH. 1993. Forest résonnes of southern New England. Resource Bulletin NE-127. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service.
6. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION', DIVISION OF FORESTRY. 1994. The Connecticut primary processors directory. Hartford.
7. CUBBAGE, FAV. 1991. Public regulation of private forestry: Proactive policy responses. Journal of Forestry 89:31-35.
8. 1995. Regulation of private forest practices: What rights, which policies? Journal of Forestry 93(6):H-20.
9. CUBBAGE, F.W., and W.C. SIEGEL. I988. State and local regulation of private forestry in the East. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 5 (2) : 103-8.
10. ELLEFSON, P.V., and A.S. CHANG. 199-4. State forest practice programs: Regulation of private forestry comes of age. Jour?ialofForestry92(5):3-i-37.
11. ELLEFSON, P.V., and P.D. MILES. 1985. Protecting water quality in the Midwest: Impact on timber harvesting costs. Northern Journal ofAfplieJ Forestry 2(2):')7-6.
12. GREENE.J.L, and W.C.SIEGEL 1994. The status and impact of sutf and local regulation on private timber supply. General Technical Report RM-255. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Sen-ice.
13. HAWKS, L.J., FAX. CUBBAGE, H.L. HANEY JR., R.M. SHAFFER, and D.H. NENV.MAN. 1993. Forest water quality protection: A comparison of regulatory and voluntary programs. Journal of Forestry 91 (5):48-54.
14. MACCONNELL, W.P., and W.E. ARCHEY. 1982. Forest landowner characteristics and attitudes in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. Research Bulletin No. 679. Amherst, MA: Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station.
15. MARTUS, C.E., H.L. HANEYJR., and W.C. SIEGEL 1995. Local forest regulatory ordinances: Trends in the eastern United States. Journal ofForestry(6):27-51.
16. MATHER, A.S. 1990. Global forest resources. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
17. RICKENBACH, M.G., D.B. KITTREDGEJR., D. DENNIS, and T. STEVENS. 1998. Ecosystem management: Capturing the concept for woodland owners. Journal of Forestry %(4):\S-24.
18. SIEGEL, W.C, and T.K. HAINES. 1990. State wetland protection legislation affecting forestry in the northeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 33-34(l-4):239-52.
19. STIER, J.C., and A.J. MARTIN. 1997. Economic impacts of limber harvest regulations in the lower Wisconsin State Riverway. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry H(3):126-34.
20. YOUELL, C.E. 1985. RC&D study of municipal regulation of timber harvesting in Connecticut. Storrs: Connecticut Resource, Conservation, and Development Committee.