Enhancement characteristics of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and its scar by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 200-204

  Martí Bonmatí, Luis ^a   Casillas, Carlos ^a   Dosdá, Rosa ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DR PESET   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contrast enhancement liver; Focal nodular hyperplasia liver neoplasms; Magnetic resonance (MR); MR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LIVER FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; LIVER INJURY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR;

ADULT; CICATRIX; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0343091414     PISSN: 13528661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-8661(00)00088-0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Buetow P.C., Pantongrag-Brown L., Buck J.L., Ros P.R., Goodman Z.D. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 16:1996;369-388.
2. Vilgrain V., Fléjou J.-F., Arrivé L. et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: MR imaging and pathologic correlation in 37 patients. Radiology. 184:1992;699-703.
3. Semelka R.C., Shoenut J.P., Kroeker M.A. et al. Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology. 184:1992;687-694.
4. Marchal G., Ni Y., Van Damme B. et al. Role of contrast agent perfusion and diffusion in the NMR signal enhanced of liver lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 16:1992;690-698.
5. Mahfouz A.E., Hamm B., Taupitz M., Wolf K.J. Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 186:1993;133-138.
6. Yoshida H., Itai Y., Ohtomo K., Kokubo T., Minami M., Yashiro N. Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 171:1989;339-342.
7. Martí-Bonmatí L., Masiá L., Torrijo C., Casillas C., Ferrer M.D. Dynamic MR imaging of liver tumors: analysis with temporal reconstruction images. Radiology. 193:1994;677-682.
8. Mathieu D., Rahmouni A., Anglade M.C. et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: assessment with contrast-enhanced turboFLASH MR imaging. Radiology. 180:1991;25-30.
9. Groell R., Kugler C., Aschauer M. et al. Quantitative perfusion parameters of focal nodular hyperplasia and normal liver parenchyma as determined by electron beam tomography. Br J Radiol. 68:1995;1185-1189.
10. Rummeny E., Weissleder R., Sironi S. et al. Central scars in primary liver tumors: MR features, specificity, and pathologic correlation. Radiology. 171:1989;323-326.
11. Rofsky N.M., Weinreb J.C., Bernardino M.E., Young S.W., Lee J.K., Noz M.E. Hepatocellular tumors: characterization with Mn-DPDP-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 188:1993;53-59.
12. Denys A., Arrivé L., Servois V., Dubray B., Najmark D., Sibert A., Menu Y. Hepatic tumors: detection and characterization at 1-T MR imaging enhanced with AMI-25. Radiology. 193:1994;665-669.
13. Grandin C., Van Beers B.E., Robert A., Gigot J.-F., Geubel A., Pringot Benign hepatocellular tumors: MRI after superparamagnetic iron oxide administration. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 19:1995;412-418.